One more show-stopper for auto-discovery of OpenGL apps is the fact that
some applications load libGL dynamically at run-time. I haven't got any
feedback to my GL application survey, but at the moment I see a
built-in database (does lookup-table sound less scary?) of known GL
applications as the
Felix Kühling schrieb:
One more show-stopper for auto-discovery of OpenGL apps is the fact that
some applications load libGL dynamically at run-time. I haven't got any
feedback to my GL application survey, but at the moment I see a
built-in database (does lookup-table sound less scary?) of
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 14:00 -0800 schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
Felix Kühling wrote:
for the next version of DRIconf I'm working on a database of known
applications that can be selected from a menu. This way users won't need
to go through the confusion of finding out the correct executable
Felix Kühling wrote:
Yeah, but these are exactly the hard cases that are most confusing to
users and that I'm trying to solve. Also some executables don't have
very descriptive names, like fgfs for FlightGear. It's also impossible
to sort auto-detected applications into meaningful categories.
