Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2003 23:06 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2003 23:31 schrieb Keith Whitwell:
> > Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > >> Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and
> > >> the ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
> >
Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2003 23:31 schrieb Keith Whitwell:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >> Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and
> >> the ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
> >> http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp
Keith Whitwell wrote:
The problem is (probably) due to excessive flushing introduced by the
changes Ian referenced. I had time to put together a patch, but at that
point was having real issues getting CVS to compile. These are probably
at my end, but before they were resolved I got sidetracked
Ian Romanick wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and
the ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and the
ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri
driver is q
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:36, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Well, I've never tried to install the whole XFree86 when it's running,
> > but I'm often lazy and just compile the mesa/src/drv/r200 if only small
> > changes happen a
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:36, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >
> > >> As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have
> > >> something to do with it.
> > >
> > > If you make sure tha
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:36, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> >> As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have
> >> something to do with it.
> >
> > If you make sure that the old driver.so file is removed, not
> > overwritten, th
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the
dri driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in
SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july? Could this be
related to the changes with GLX_NV_vertex_array_ran
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have
something to do with it.
If you make sure that the old driver.so file is removed, not
overwritten, there shouldn't be any problem, as existing open
filehandles won't then see any changes
Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have
something to do with it.
If you make sure that the old driver.so file is removed, not overwritten,
there shouldn't be any problem, as existing open filehandles won't then see
any changes.
I'm not sure if the XFr
As I recall KDE preloads libGL for some reason. that might have
something to do with it.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 23:17, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >
> > btw why exactly isn't it possible to hot-swap (when xfree86 is
> running)
> > the dri driv
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 23:17, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>
> btw why exactly isn't it possible to hot-swap (when xfree86 is running)
> the dri driver (r200_dri.so)? This kinda works, but kwm, kicker
> kwhatever insists on crashing shortly afterwards :-(
Weird, when you do what exactly? I've never
Keith Whitwell wrote:
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri
driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in
SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july? Could this be
related to the changes with GLX_NV_vertex_array_range,
GLX_MESA_agp_offset, G
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 03:49, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri
driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in
SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july?
I wonder if it could be related to r
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Slightly OT, but here's an article comparing XiG Summit, dri cvs and the
ATI driver on a radeon 9000pro.
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux_oct03/ati_linux_comp_oct03.html
And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri
driver is qu
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:51:20PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 03:49, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >
> > And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri
> > driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in
> > SpecViewPerf compared to the
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 03:49, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>
> And to get this fully on-topic, is there a specific reason why the dri
> driver is quite a bit slower (up to 50% in some subtests) in
> SpecViewPerf compared to the cvs version of july?
I wonder if it could be related to recent 2D drive
18 matches
Mail list logo
