I made the linux vs linux-2.6 split because people wanted the GPL code
isolated. Anyway, it looks like linux-core may override the linux-2.6
directory when we can say it is working. I thought the snapshots were
snapshoting the whole DRM tree.
I tried to fix it so that if you built the linux direc
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:33:00 +0200
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Miércoles, 29 de Septiembre del 2004 3:20 AM, Jon Smirl escribió:
> > Get the code from here:
> > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/dri co drm
> > and build in the linux-2.6 directory.
> >
> > It looks like you are mi
El Miércoles, 29 de Septiembre del 2004 3:20 AM, Jon Smirl escribió:
> Get the code from here:
> cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/dri co drm
> and build in the linux-2.6 directory.
>
> It looks like you are missing drm_sysfs.h which is is the CVS repository.
> I'm building mach64 from CVS
Get the code from here:
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/dri co drm
and build in the linux-2.6 directory.
It looks like you are missing drm_sysfs.h which is is the CVS repository.
I'm building mach64 from CVS on my machine without problems on current linus-bk.
There files should be in th
I am trying to compile the mach64 drm kernel module for kernel
2.6.9-rc2-mm4 from latest cvs as the code from the mach64 tree from
January is regrettably no longer compiling for me, too many changes to
the drm code in the kernel apparently (mostly problems with drmP.h).
Anyway, I downloaded the la
