For every one way someone prefers to code, there are several others
that prefer the other way. Personally, I like the standard we have in
place. Is it a big deal either way? No. But let's just stick with what we
have, or else risk someone else coming along and preferring to change
it all over
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:16 PM, David Shrewsbury
shrewsbury.d...@gmail.com wrote:
For every one way someone prefers to code, there are several others
that prefer the other way.
Is that a reason to stop trying to improve?
Personally, I like the standard we have in
place. Is it a big deal
On Jul 13, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:16 PM, David Shrewsbury
shrewsbury.d...@gmail.com wrote:
For every one way someone prefers to code, there are several others
that prefer the other way.
Is that a reason to stop trying to improve?
It is only
On 07/13/2011 08:31 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:16 PM, David Shrewsbury
shrewsbury.d...@gmail.com wrote:
For every one way someone prefers to code, there are several others
that prefer the other way.
Is that a reason to stop trying to improve?
Personally, I like
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, pcrews glee...@gmail.com wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/01/msg00153.html
You seem to have a pattern of expecting people to go into painstaking detail
to explain why they don't happen to agree with your ideas.
That's not true. It is true that I
On 07/13/2011 10:38 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
snip
Of course. However, I already posted why I think the two things should
be changed. Without a response to those arguments, I don't see what
else I could do.
With all due respect, you only provided a reason for why one thing
should be changed
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:08 PM, pcrews glee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/13/2011 10:38 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
snip
Of course. However, I already posted why I think the two things should
be changed. Without a response to those arguments, I don't see what
else I could do.
With all due
On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I'm not saying your ideas don't have merit, just that the onus is on you to
defend their worth rather than expecting everyone else to defend the way
things are working now.
Of course. However, I already posted why I think the two
Excerpts from Olaf van der Spek's message of Sat Jul 02 10:36:53 -0700 2011:
Hi,
I think some parts need updating.
http://wiki.drizzle.org/Coding_Standards#Pointer_and_Reference_Expressions
string foo;
IMO it should be string. The is part of the type, not part of the name.
return
Hey folks,
OSCon is giving us two free exhibit only passes with our booth. Is there
anyone who would like them?
Kent
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
10 matches
Mail list logo
