Hi.
we've been funded for new hardware for our Digital Library (yay!) and I'm
now being asked what Operating system is required. The suggestion is Redhat
EL 4. I'm sure that will be fine, but (being a Solaris person) I'd like
reassurance, so .
Can anyone please confirm that RHEL4 is OK for
> --
> Message: 2
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:07:48 -0500
From: Mark Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] OS for DSpace
To: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Conten
Hello Steve,
Most any Linux/Unix is acceptable (Even Apple OSX and Windows have
been attempted successfully). The requirements are more Application
centric:
Postgresql 7.3 or greater (the latest 8.x is recommended)
Java 1.4 or greater (again recommend the latest 1.5)
Tomcat 4.x or greater (
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:41 +1030, Steve Thomas wrote:
> Hi.
> we’ve been funded for new hardware for our Digital Library (yay!) and
> I’m now being asked what Operating system is required. The suggestion
> is Redhat EL 4. I’m sure that will be fine, but (being a Solaris
> person) I’d like reassur
Hi Steve,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:11, Steve Thomas wrote:
> we’ve been funded for new hardware for our Digital Library (yay!) and
> I’m now being asked what Operating system is required. The suggestion
> is Redhat EL 4. I’m sure that will be fine, but (being a Solaris
> person) I’d like reass
Thanks guys, but just to note, we know that in both these cases
neither RHEL or Fedoras default GNU GCJ Java implementation or
distribution channels were used to maintain the Java "Stack". So in
both cases the question of will it run on RHEL using the supported
packages provided by Redhat i
Hi Steve
Steve Thomas wrote:
> Can anyone please confirm that RHEL4 is OK for DSpace?
It's fine, but as others have said, what's wrong with Solaris?
As for Gentoo, I can't recommend it for use in production unless you a)
have someone who already knows what they're doing with Gentoo, and b)
you
Steve,
Steve Thomas wrote:
>
> Can anyone please confirm that RHEL4 is OK for DSpace?
Looks like you already have plenty of "yes" answers to this. :)
I just wanted to pipe in that we're currently running our production
installation of DSpace on RHEL3...and I don't believe RHEL4 would be too
Tim,
Nobody has yet to actually answer the deeper question about RHEL...
How about you guys? Are you running DSpace on Java/Tomcat provided
by RHEL support channels/updates or are you running on a "rolled
your own" installation of java/tomcat? Or alternatively, are you
using JPackage?
-M
Mark (and Steve),
Mark Diggory wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Nobody has yet to actually answer the deeper question about RHEL... How
> about you guys? Are you running DSpace on Java/Tomcat provided by RHEL
> support channels/updates or are you running on a "rolled your own"
> installation of java/tomcat?
5:47
> To: Mark Diggory
> Cc: dspace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net; Steve Thomas
> Subject: Re: [Dspace-tech] OS for DSpace
>
> Mark (and Steve),
>
> Mark Diggory wrote:
>> Tim,
>>
>> Nobody has yet to actually answer the deeper question about RHEL...
>> Ho
So why use RHEL if your hand installing everything, it pretty much
doesn't matter what Linux distro you use, why not use a free one? It
seems paying for is supported version of the software stack, and not
using that supported configuration pretty much negates that service.
-Mark
On Feb 8, 2
Mark Diggory wrote:
> So why use RHEL if your hand installing everything, it pretty much
> doesn't matter what Linux distro you use, why not use a free one? It
> seems paying for is supported version of the software stack, and not
> using that supported configuration pretty much negates that
Mark,
Mark Diggory wrote:
> So why use RHEL if your hand installing everything, it pretty much
> doesn't matter what Linux distro you use, why not use a free one? It
> seems paying for is supported version of the software stack, and not
> using that supported configuration pretty much negates
Sure, makes sense.
-Mark
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Tim Donohue wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Mark Diggory wrote:
> > So why use RHEL if your hand installing everything, it pretty much
> > doesn't matter what Linux distro you use, why not use a free one? It
> > seems paying for is supported version of th
All,
On 02/08/2007 09:21 AM, Mark Diggory wrote:
> Nobody has yet to actually answer the deeper question about RHEL...
> How about you guys? Are you running DSpace on Java/Tomcat provided
> by RHEL support channels/updates or are you running on a "rolled
> your own" installation of java/tom
Brad Teale wrote:
> All,
> I've looked around RedHat EL and couldn't find a properly supported
> Apache/Java/Tomat stack from RedHat. Our Institution wide IT department
> recommends using RH Apache and Java/Tomcat installed by the user. I'm
> still working with them for the mod_jk package. The
I just find it odd that RedHat doesn't seem to provide all the Apache
modules. I _did_ find a mod_jk rpm mentioned on rhn.redhat.com, but it
seems to only be a source RPM. Where as, Debian and other distros (I've
used) package mod_jk binariesjust seems funny that RedHat is afraid?
of packagin
Brad,
https://www.redhat.com/solutions/rhappstack/
The challenge is that like someone mentioned earlier, they are only
providing bea and ibm 1.4.x JVM's via that channel. I'm not convinced
you'll see Suns JVM there until the whole thing rolls over to Java
1.5, sun didn't relicense 1.4.x the
Mark et al.,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 18:07, Mark Diggory wrote:
> One of main reasons I jumped on-board with Alex's push to use Gentoo
> for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that, in production, I'd much rather have a tried,
> tested, well integrated "JAT" (Java Apache Tomcat) stack distributed
> by the
20 matches
Mail list logo
