>for an auction system. Is there something you wish eBay would offer that
>they currently don't, or just plain something done better? Or is there
>something new you would like to see on an auction system?
ya... eBay doesn't have auctions denominated in Grams of Gold, but Pay By Gold does.
This contest was originally intended only for beta-testers of the
GoldBarter.com system. However, the contest is being extended to anyone
who wishes to participate.
Dear e-gold users, and other free-market types: I have an opportunity for
you to win some free gold! Specifically, 2.5g of that meta
A question
Say I was a person that had turned up at a web page that offered e-gold or
Standard Reserve as an option of payment for something. And I had never
heard of e-gold or Standard Reserve before,
Would anyone on this list have a "BRIEF" summary that I could read that
would:
1) Let me know
> > A bunch of cowards that hide behind pseudonyms while loudly proclaiming
> > their superior intelligence over everyone at G&SR et al, yet
> > surprisingly never willing to even identify themselves, not alone start
> > a competing gold-based currency.
> >
>
Oops...Just re-read the message...y
> Messages repeating two, three, four times due to the incompetent dweebs
> running the e-gold list.
>
The incompetent dweebs are probably not the ones running the list, but the
ones sending the message multiple times.
> A bunch of cowards that hide behind pseudonyms while loudly proclaiming
>
At 12:38 PM +1300 1/30/01, Sidd wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>I have adjusted the www.two-cents-worth.com script so that it now
>accepts short account numbers.
>
>I also (from a users suggestion... thanks Vic) made the amount payable
>into an adjustable amount, so if the payer REALLY liked your message
Hey look at this! (Especially Jim!)
http://www.bananagold.com/oddsandends/weird-ad.jpg
You know sometimes in an ADVERTISEMENT, a computer company will make
up a FICTIONAL dot-com company, as an example to use in their ad?
Look at that one!
Weird!
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-
I'm away from e-mail for a couple days and what a wonderful surprise I
had; 160 e-mails from this list. Lets see if I can recap.
Messages repeating two, three, four times due to the incompetent dweebs
running the e-gold list.
A bunch of cowards that hide behind pseudonyms while loudly proclaimi
Hi Everyone,
I have adjusted the www.two-cents-worth.com script so that it now
accepts short account numbers.
I also (from a users suggestion... thanks Vic) made the amount payable
into an adjustable amount, so if the payer REALLY liked your message
then [s]he can pay you more. People who wish t
> However, you have the get the 400 oz. of e-gold in the account in the
> first place. This usually involves an inexchange. This is where the
> inexchange fees come from.
OK, I got you. However, if you wanted to buy 400oz of e-gold, you could
probably get a better deal than 4% if you either calle
> > I multiplied by 4% because that is what will be lost in InExchange fees.
> > After you fill up an account to 400 ounces e-gold and redeem it for a bar,
> > you will still have something worth over $100k. However you will have
> > spent $4200 acquiring this bar.
>
> InExchange fees don't apply
> I multiplied by 4% because that is what will be lost in InExchange fees.
> After you fill up an account to 400 ounces e-gold and redeem it for a bar,
> you will still have something worth over $100k. However you will have
> spent $4200 acquiring this bar.
InExchange fees don't apply here. If yo
"James H. Cloos Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"SnowDog" == SnowDog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SnowDog> "9.1.2. Erroneous Exchange Rate
SnowDog> G&SR reserves the right to cancel an OmniPay order if the
SnowDog> exchange rate for the transaction was clearly erroneous. This
SnowDog> repu
Not quite sure why you want to focus on this aspect of the message since I
have already stated our position. We have no intention of launching the
effort under that name at this point because it would most likely result in
E-GOLD not allowing us an account to work with. I'm not quite sure why yo
Hi,
I just received information about FastGold.
They say they will fund your e-gold acct in 24 - 48 hours for 8% fee.
Is there a better rate available anywhere?
I signed up, under no obligations, at least to learn more about them.
http://fastgold.net/members/Netmender/
--
Thanks,
Paul Andre
> "SnowDog" == SnowDog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SnowDog> Yes, we know they only accept bailment from G&SR, but the
SnowDog> question is "Why?" It is my understanding that this policy
SnowDog> is from the Bank of Nova Scotia.
Wasn't it Central Escrow's due diligence demands that was behi
> > When they are playing at being egold they won't roll back a transaction.
> > When they are playing at being Omnipay they will. Same guys pursuing
> > policies of convenience.
>
> Two user-agreement with different provisions.
>
Ding, ding, ding, ding We have a winner!
There are two dif
>Kid Rock wrote:
> Thank you to the gentleman who suggested that I look at the contracts. It is
> right there on the egold and Digigold websites for all to see. Thank you to
> Dagny for the domain name hint.
>
Isn't it amazing what can be learned if you take the time to read the fine
print?
> T
> > Actually better make it more than $4200. It will cost that much to fill an
> > account with 400 ounces of e-gold, and then redeem it for a 400 oz. gold
> > bar.
> >
> > 400*262.50*4%=4200
>
> No, it will cost over $100,000.
>
> 400 * 262.50 = $105,000
>
> Why did you add 4%?
>
> Craig
I
> There is nothing wrong with spinning off units for all the reasons you
cite.
> There is something VERY wrong when the owner of those companies then
> misleads teh public by claiming that "we" (Omnipay) have no influence over
> "their" (egold) policies and "them lot" (Digigold) aren't even relate
> These guys don't know much about privacy if they can't even mask the trail
> that connects their own offshore companies. [...]
E-gold was not set-up as a private, offshore haven. Why did you assume
otherwise?
Check out this part of their privacy policy:
"Unless (i) necessary for completing Ou
Thank you to the gentleman who suggested that I look at the contracts. It is
right there on the egold and Digigold websites for all to see. Thank you to
Dagny for the domain name hint.
The domain names digigold.net, e-gold.com and omnipay.net are all registered
to G&SR. Dumb.
DigiGold Ltd and
Sorry, forgot my name in the above post.
Tracy Guss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gold-Age,
I've noticed that you are replying to messages on the e-gold forum. I
assume then that you are not out of business. Can you respond to my
repeated requests for information regarding past due payment from
gold-age. Why have you not funded my account for the amount that you
charged my cred
Sir,
I've noticed that you are replying to messages on the e-gold forum. I
assume then that you are not out of business. Can you respond to my
repeated requests for information regarding past due payment from
gold-age. Why have you not funded my account for the amount that you
charged my credit ca
Sir,
I've noticed that you are replying to messages on the e-gold forum. I
assume then that you are not out of business. Can you respond to my
repeated requests for information regarding past due payment from
gold-age. Why have you not funded my account for the amount that you
charged my credit ca
Thank you for taking the time to explain things.
e-gold et al should consider themselves lucky to have
such devoted followers.
In the words of that great American Philosopher Bugs
Bunny:
Just because it seemed like it wasn't fun, it wasn't.
I have to go back and try to save a railroad now!
--
Ursha LLC wrote:
>
> Dear users! We have opened the e-gold account 239668 and have written
> the information about this in our electronic shop www.russiashop.com.ru.
> Tell me please - this information enough to carry out payments on our
> account?
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to e-g
EgoldXchange wrote:
>
> We are currently awaiting some communication from E-gold regarding some
> issues that have prevented us from launching our website and service
> directly, but hope to be introducing soon, a US Bank based, debit card+bank
> account that can be used for in and out exchanges
At 10:40 PM -0800 on 1/28/01, Dagny Taggart wrote:
> Digital
> bearer commodities
Just for fun, here, digital bearer is a financial cryptography term of art
for a class of protocols which are functionally anonymous by default
because they don't require book-entries, and thus biometric identity,
Egold is a VERY good idea .. an "international currency" .. really
fantastic ! !
It's NOT hard to have an account, not TOO difficult to fund and
transactions are instant (if the egold site is "up").
Now there is even a debit card available (to access your egold) and we
have DigiGold .. BUT .. t
> Actually better make it more than $4200. It will cost that much to fill an
> account with 400 ounces of e-gold, and then redeem it for a 400 oz. gold
> bar.
>
> 400*262.50*4%=4200
No, it will cost over $100,000.
400 * 262.50 = $105,000
Why did you add 4%?
Craig
---
You are currently subs
> >Agreed, Omnipay does the OutExchanges. I misspoke
>
> No you didn't. It was the first coherent thing that you have written in a
> long time. You spend so much effort bleating about how holy egold is that
> you refuse to acknowledge that their business practices are a joke.
I work for a company
Hello!
I believe I'm beginning to understand why you're feeling uncomfortable.
> If it is widely known that
> e-gold,/G&SR/omnipay/digigold is the same group of
> guys
> hiding behind four different corporate shells, why are
> you so comfortable when they back out of a transaction
> here and the
>
> I will pay $1000 to teh first person who gets egold to bail out one ounce
> let alone one bar of gold.
>
> KR
Actually better make it more than $4200. It will cost that much to fill an
account with 400 ounces of e-gold, and then redeem it for a 400 oz. gold
bar.
400*262.50*4%=4200
Viking
>Dagny Taggart wrote:
>
> why are
> you so comfortable when they back out of a transaction
> here and then refuse to back out of a transaction
> there?
When have they backed out of any transaction? They refuse to back out
every transaction.
> Either they believe in the sanctity of a contract or
>Kid Rock wrote:
>
> The SAME GUYS make the rules for all three companies. They play heads I win
> tails you lose. They have sycophants to defend their malfeasance.
>
> This bothers me.
>
Don, their are some lovely windmills elsewhere for you to attack.
>
> They would rather slap at Dagney Ta
37 matches
Mail list logo