[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-06 Thread major bosco
> > Besides any opinion you supply I would consider biased since you > > work for goldmoney by providing Cambio services. > >Well it is true. But I am also an e-gold market maker. Indeed, I'm sure you are but that is e-gold's problem and not mine. > >Well to solve the issue, I suggest you read

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-06 Thread C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc.
On 6 Feb 2002, at 16:33, major bosco wrote: > Besides any opinion you supply I would consider biased since you > work for goldmoney by providing Cambio services. Well it is true. But I am also an e-gold market maker. Well to solve the issue, I suggest you read article VIII B & C. Then go to yo

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-06 Thread major bosco
> > I would have to say that I agree entirely with Mr. Griffth. > >Well then I think you are wrong. That Sir, is simply your biased opinion. As I think you are the mistaken party. Besides any opinion you supply I would consider biased since you work for goldmoney by providing Cambio services.

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc.
On 5 Feb 2002, at 17:55, Patrick Chkoreff wrote: > I've sometimes wondered how GoldMoney would settle up if they decided > to go out of business. Well the goal is not to go out of business of course. > Obviously one way to distribute the property to the smaller account > holders would be to sel

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc.
On 5 Feb 2002, at 22:48, major bosco wrote: > I would have to say that I agree entirely with Mr. Griffth. Well then I think you are wrong. > Where else do gg's exist outside of the goldmoney system? Are gg's a > PHYSICAL item? NO - Of course not. It is a digital information. they are a e

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread Ken Griffith
JP, You've never heard of elephant bars? Ken --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interface

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread major bosco
I never said they didn't have a right to try to protect it -- I simply question the motives behind the action. E-Gold has been in business for years -- why wait until well after goldmoney launches to file suit? They could have filed this suit years ago -- it obvious that they are more interested

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread SnowDog
> IMHO, it's obvious that goldmoney is using this bogus patent issue because > they are getting blown away by their competition in sales volume. Shoot, if I had a patent, I'd try to protect it -- even if there was just a chance that the judge might rule in my favor. You just can't let something l

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread Patrick Chkoreff
- Original Message - From: "C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In law, there is such thing as "undivided property". Someone can > have a title on part of a whole. This part does not need to be > defined in other way than saying it is x% of the whole. > > The owners of an "un

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread major bosco
I would have to say that I agree entirely with Mr. Griffth. Where else do gg's exist outside of the goldmoney system? Are gg's a PHYSICAL item? NO - they are a electronic form of a demand note backed by bullion held in storage ar Viamat. Goldmoney in it's current form is at odd's with their

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread Ken Griffith
> "The owners of an "undivided property" own a title not a claim. Claude, you may be correct. The courts will have to decide. However, regardless of whether GoldGrams represent a title or merely a claim, the patent suit against e-gold contradicts the patent itself. The patent claims that GoldM

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread Ragnar
--- "C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5 Feb 2002, at 16:26, Ken Griffith wrote: > > > http://www.goldeconomy.com/article.php?sid=169 > I own a 1% undivided in a quatitity of 10 > kilos of > gold. I am the owner of that quantity. Who cares in which bar > it is? Can any

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread Ragnar
--- Ken Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://www.goldeconomy.com/article.php?sid=169 "GoldMoney has not invented anything new. It has merely assembled a permutation of the prior arts of book-entry accounting, information networks, “deposit currency”, and gold bullion storage to allow the ea

[e-gold-list] Re: Turk Patent Suit debunked

2002-02-05 Thread C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc.
On 5 Feb 2002, at 16:26, Ken Griffith wrote: > http://www.goldeconomy.com/article.php?sid=169 Hello Ken, I disagree with your conclusion that a goldgram is a claim on the total gold asset hold by the Goldmoney users. In law, there is such thing as "undivided property". Someone can have a tit