>> You did ;) Your addition to the wrf easyblock did the trick for me. At
>> least with intel/2016a. I still cannot build WRF with foss, but that's
>> another issue, as the existing WRF-3.6/foss also doesn't build on my
>> machine. I'll report the issue next week, I guess, but as I have a
>>
On 29/04/16 21:38, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
Kenneth Hoste writes:
How did you fix the problems you were running into?
You did ;) Your addition to the wrf easyblock did the trick for me. At
least with intel/2016a. I still cannot build WRF with foss, but that's
another issue, as
Hi Kenneth,
Kenneth Hoste writes:
> How did you fix the problems you were running into?
You did ;) Your addition to the wrf easyblock did the trick for me. At
least with intel/2016a. I still cannot build WRF with foss, but that's
another issue, as the existing WRF-3.6/foss also doesn't build
Hi Andreas,
On 29/04/16 16:46, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
Hi easybuilders,
so there's the WRF easyconfig, which works fine for me.
Good to hear WRF is working fine for you know!
How did you fix the problems you were running into?
Now I want to
run WRF-Chem, and if I understand the
Hi easybuilders,
so there's the WRF easyconfig, which works fine for me. Now I want to
run WRF-Chem, and if I understand the documentation correctly, this is
done by
a) extracting an additional source tarball into the WRFV3 directory
b) setting some environment variables telling WRF to include
5 matches
Mail list logo
