Dear all,
The web pages some of you know as 'Ecofeminism on the Web' now have
an easy to remember url!
www.ecofem.org
please pass this information onto anyone who may be interested, and
anyone who is interested but just doesn't know it yet.
love,
richard
~
No big ego trip to say this but I've now had too many requests for my paper
on the men's movement to send a copy to everybody. As Stephen reminded me
I would be being unkind to our tree friends. But silly me I feel obligated
(I don't know why, most people behave quite distant on the net, the
Thanks for your mailing Kath, I'm sorry if my message appeared angry, it
wasn't supposed to be. My main point is that you put on some outstanding
courses/speakers and who gets to attend, mostly the wealthy. Emancipatory
knowledge (Bly excepted) should be democratised, not locked up. A criticism,
There might be some interesting courses at the College, but it's courses
are notoriously expensive and thus elitist. And how did Robert Bly get
to teach there? Anyone who's read Iron John will be familiar with his
methods and misogyny.
Richard,
London (again sorry)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue
I didn't really intend to start anotherv discussion on essentialism, if
people care to check the threads of this list (if they have net access)
they will see that we have that before more than once. Not that it isn't
a worthy and complex issue of discussion. For example, it is the nature of
an
Well nothing to do with Mary Mellor at all actually..Just hopefully
a catalyst for discussion...
"Bothe radical and conservative feminists who argue for a distinct
nature for women ground their arguments in women's close association with
nature. The notion that woman has a distinct
There's really 450 people on this list???
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 23 08:32:33 1997
by lismore.cc.strath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.58 #1)
From: "Kristen.Clarke" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NO MORE PLEASE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:32:20 + (GMT)
Mary Mellor also wrote with others-
"Worker Cooperatives in Theory and Practice" (1992)
The ISBN is 0-335-15862-5
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 23 11:39:31 1997
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 97 13:36:38 EST
From: Stephanie Coughlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PROFESSIONAL
Hi Sandra,
Might there be any way, after the event, of getting hold of some
summaries of the keynote speeches?
Yours hopefully,
Richard,
London
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 21 07:32:54 1997
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 09:34:21 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Sandra Krajewski [EMAIL
Well 'Breaking the Boundaries' I beleive is the main text, then she had an
article in the journal 'Environmental Politics' the content of which is
reproduced I think in the aforementioned text.I know she has done other stuff,
I'll write again if i find more info
Richard,
London
From [EMAIL
Hello John Barry! I beleive we have a mutual friend in Mick Smith at
the University of Abertay, Dundee (formerly Stirling)? Good to see you on
EcoFem.
Richard Twine
London
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 13 11:53:01 1997
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 13:55:12 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL
Well a lot of people have criticised 'Reweaving the World' by Diamond
and Orenstein for its essentialism, which isn't to say that there is not
a lot of worthy articles within. I would strongly urge that given the
diversity of the area it is impossible to recommend a couple of books to
cover the
Or "The universe is in a constant state of marketing" !?! Sure it's a
great book though.
hmmm, as in carolyn merchant, Cheryl?
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 13 08:52:54 1996
Organization: HEADWATERS DEAL IS **NO DEAL**! DEBT FOR NATURE -- JAIL CHARLES HURWITZ!
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 07:45:40 -0800
To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Moonshadow [EMAIL
From: MX%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 9-DEC-1996 09:52:57.04
To: MX%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CC:
Subj: Splash! (fwd)
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+0200 (EET)
11:51:50 +0200 (EET)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 11:51:49 +0200 (EET)
From: Outi Koivisto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Richard
I thought we were talking about "e-mail" junk-mail, which
I think I am correct to say does not actually use paper,
unless one is stupid enough to actually print it out.
However, such junk on the e-mail is also a waste of energy.
My comment was just about the lack of discussion on ecofeminism
on
16 matches
Mail list logo
