Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-23 Thread Sappington, Thomas [ENT]
…. --Tom From: Malcolm McCallum [mailto:malcolm.mccallum.ta...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 9:05 PM To: Sappington, Thomas [ENT] Cc: ecolog Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship So then, you were not ultimately included as an author because the process worked. Had you been placed

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Malcolm McCallum
e interest of the person involved, and more > likely to be hurtful if they are left off and discover it. When in doubt, > be generous…. > > > > Best Wishes, > > --Tom > > > > *From:* Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto: > ECOL

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship -taking responsibility

2016-08-22 Thread Gary Grossman
COLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU >> Cc: Dr. Aaron T. Dossey <aaron.t.dos...@allthingsbugs.com>; >> all.things.b...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship >> >> >> Is that Entomological Society or Ecological Society? >> >> * A c

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread David Clayton Schneider
Dear Jorge, With many others, my thanks for raising the topic. Here is how I would handle your dilemma. I would focus on the criteria (ICMJE) or guidelines (ESA), keeping in mind these are guidelines and criteria, not rules and regulations. Your dilemma is a potential co-author that has not

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship -taking responsibility

2016-08-22 Thread D R Strong
org>; ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Cc: Dr. Aaron T. Dossey <aaron.t.dos...@allthingsbugs.com>; all.things.b...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Is that Entomological Society or Ecological Society? * A code written of, for and by professors I am sure nonetheless. On 8/22/

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship -taking responsibility

2016-08-22 Thread Aaron T. Dossey
Cc: Dr. Aaron T. Dossey <aaron.t.dos...@allthingsbugs.com>; all.things.b...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Is that Entomological Society or Ecological Society? * A code written of, for and by professors I am sure nonetheless. On 8/22/2016 8:15 AM, Cliff Duke wrote

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship -taking responsibility

2016-08-22 Thread David Schneider
ron.t.dos...@allthingsbugs.com>; all.things.b...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Is that Entomological Society or Ecological Society? * A code written of, for and by professors I am sure nonetheless. On 8/22/2016 8:15 AM, Cliff Duke wrote: Concerning the recent "qu

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Sappington, Thomas [ENT]
, --Tom From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news [mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Loretta Fisher Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 6:44 PM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship I'm glad this discussion was started. I'm learning a lot from

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Sappington, Thomas [ENT]
RV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Cliff Duke Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 8:15 AM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Concerning the recent "query on authorship," there is no ethical ambiguity. The ESA Code of Ethics is quite clear on that point: "Re

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Cliff Duke
aron T. Dossey <aaron.t.dos...@allthingsbugs.com>; all.things.b...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Is that Entomological Society or Ecological Society? * A code written of, for and by professors I am sure nonetheless. On 8/22/2016 8:15 AM, Cliff Duke wrote: > Concer

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Aaron T. Dossey
LOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> on behalf of Gary Grossman <gdgross...@gmail.com> Sent: August 20, 2016 12:04 PM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Querido Jorge, this is a murky area of co-authorship except for one point. Coauthorship is *earned* and shou

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Ed Laurent
e. Best, Jeff Houlahan >> -- >> *From:* Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news < >> ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> on behalf of Gary Grossman < >> gdgross...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* August 20, 2016 12:04 PM >> *To:*

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Somidh Saha
common but >>>> there may be instances where somebody would prefer not to have their name >>>> on >>>> a paper where they've done enough work to warrant authorship. If my name >>>> showed up on a paper without me ever being aware that it had been submitt

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-22 Thread Cliff Duke
Concerning the recent "query on authorship," there is no ethical ambiguity. The ESA Code of Ethics is quite clear on that point: "Researchers will not add or delete authors from a manuscript submitted for publication without consent of those authors. Researchers will not include as coauthor(s)

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Geepee437 .
ttle bothered. If I read the paper and didn't >>> agree with the interpretation I would be very unhappy. That said, the idea >>> of not giving credit to somebody who deserves it just seems wrong. This is >>> a rock and a hard place. Best, Jeff Houlahan >>&

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Aaron T. Dossey
I vote b. I find a to be unethical (though sadly on par with academia). C technically would be ethical but if it's good data why leave it out based on the sole motivation of being exclusive rather than inclusive? Who knows, you might be having a hard time finding the other student because

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Loretta Fisher
d be very unhappy. >> That said, the idea of not giving credit to somebody who deserves it just >> seems wrong. This is a rock and a hard place. Best, Jeff Houlahan >> -- >> *From:* Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news < >> ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Malcolm McCallum
k and a hard place. Best, Jeff Houlahan > -- > *From:* Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news < > ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> on behalf of Gary Grossman < > gdgross...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* August 20, 2016 12:04 PM > *To:* ECOLOG-L@LISTSER

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Gary Grossman
cal Society of America: grants, jobs, news < > ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> on behalf of Gary Grossman < > gdgross...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* August 20, 2016 12:04 PM > *To:* ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU > *Subject:* Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship > > Querido Jorge, this is a

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Bob O'Hara
eff Houlahan *From:* Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news <ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> on behalf of Gary Grossman <gdgross...@gmail.com> *Sent:* August 20, 2016 12:04 PM *To:* ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU *Subjec

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-21 Thread Jonathan Giacomini
Hi Jorge, I think you should try harder to track the individual down. Only after an exhaustive search would I suggest that you move forward with publishing the work. Also, why not list the person as an author and denote that said person did not contribute to writing and interpretation of data?

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-20 Thread Jeff Houlahan
G-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU> on behalf of Gary Grossman <gdgross...@gmail.com> Sent: August 20, 2016 12:04 PM To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship Querido Jorge, this is a murky area of co-authorship except for one point. Coauthorship is *earned* and should not b

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-20 Thread Gary Grossman
Querido Jorge, this is a murky area of co-authorship except for one point. Coauthorship is *earned* and should not be taken away because of some other circumstance outside of the project responsibilities. Given that the second student completed the work while they were at your institution, the

[ECOLOG-L] Query on authorship

2016-08-20 Thread Jorge A. Santiago-Blay
Query on authorship Dear Colleagues: I am writing a small paper resulting from research done with two undergraduates many years ago (and, later on, involving several other colleagues using cutting-edge technology). As the results became obvious, both of the students agreed (orally, in person)