You can now conduct free chemometrics analysis of your data over the
web! Currently you can perform PCA, PCR, PLS, and SIMCA. These methods
are available at:
http://chemometrics.odu.edu/
Sincerely,
Ali Javey
=
Instructions for
Virgil wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Radford Neal) wrote:
If approximately 2/3 of the tallied votes were for Gore, by what leap of
logic do you conclude that 1/2 of the untallied votes would have been
for Bush?
I didn't. If you actually read the passage
Responding to my posting below:
I concluded that one would expect the division to be *closer* to
1/2 each than for the clearly marked ballots. If you mix a certain
number of valid ballots with 1/3 - 2/3 proportions with another group
of invalid ballots, in which votes have been
I think what Radford Neal is saying is that *some* dimpled ballots were
dimpled by a process other than an attempt to vote, and these will
divide 50-50. This should be easily determined by comparing the number
of dimples at null locations on the card with the number that are
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thom Baguley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I admit to being confused by Radford's analysis. Radford, is your point that
if there are a large proportion of "empty/no vote" ballots then we would
expect them to be decided close to 50:50 and hence shift the balance from
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bob Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
For those who may at some time be called upon to
testify on statistical matters, it would be
worthwhile to find a way to view Hengartner's
testimony. It was one of the better such that I
have seen -- for instance,
Gene Gallagher wrote:
The full [Hengartner} transcript is available on the Washington Post
web site.
Where? I tried their search engine and found some news stories but
no transcript.
Thanks!
=
Instructions for joining and
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Robert J. MacG. Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what Radford Neal is saying is that *some* dimpled ballots were
dimpled by a process other than an attempt to vote, and these will
divide 50-50. This should be easily determined by comparing the number
Investor_DD website
http://members.nbci.com/investor%5Fdd/Investor%20DD%20NUTK.htm
Nutek, Inc. (NUTK: OTCBB)
Nutek, Inc.
15722 Chemical Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Tel : (714) 799-7266
Fax : (714) 799-5466
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
President/CEO: Murray Conradie
Investor
The message below is at:
http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/threadmsg_if.xp?AN=701156345fmt=text
Legal sophistry is truly amazing, especially the use of the phrase
"reasonable probability." This case has absolutely nothing to do with
statistics or with probability. It is a simple case of
Hello,
Would you answer the following two questions,
1) I know the variance of mean and median. What is the variance of mode?
2) Under what condition we can say mode is a better estimate of population
average than mean or median. For example, when the distribution of a
variable is Gamma, then
problem here is that there is NO agreed to operational definition of the
mode ... and if that is the case, difficult to find a variance around it(them)
At 10:06 PM 12/4/00 -0600, Alireza Tahai wrote:
Hello,
Would you answer the following two questions,
1) I know the variance of mean and
I agree with Dennis Roberts.
Te mean, the variance, the median, the mode are quantities which are
computed theoretically for a distribution.
Then , we have the sample mean, sample variance, sample median which
are random variables computed from samples. Like any random variables the
sample mean
13 matches
Mail list logo
