I have a question that was never directly addressed in any of my business
text books. Please excuse my lack of knowledge in this area; as I just need
a push in the right direction.
My current job requires me to analyze margins from the sales of various
products and provide an average for each du
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:23:02 -0500, Bruce Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi group,
> The unweighted means method for unbalanced ANOVA designs uses the
> harmonic mean of the cell sample sizes. I wonder if anyone can explain
> why the harmonic mean, as opposed to any other kind of "ave
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:05:22 -0500, "Lee Creighton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some data to analyze for my dissertation, but I'm not sure what
> method to use to answer the question I am investigating. This may not be the
> correct newsgroup for it, but there are rumors that some statist
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:07:34 -0600, Bill Vedder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to better understand a statistical method which is vaguely
> outlined in a paper I'm reading and am hoping a kind soul here can help.
>
> The method is described as "variance reduction". The author uses it
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:51:25 GMT, Gene Gallagher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
< snip >
> The DOE's latest description of the conversion of raw points to scaled
> scores is for the 1999 exam. These reports were issued Fall 2000. The
> appendices of this 52 page pdf to the schools gives the scalin
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rich Ulrich quoted me:
> DB: > What most people who use "ordinal" and "disordinal" seem to mean
> > is a plot of the cell means (or of regression lines), with no
> > adjustment for main effects: so, a display that includes the
> > interaction AND the main effects. I take
Steve's Webpage cites the URL of an article that has the opposite
opinion from mine. I would not mind seeing some comments from other
people. I will add some more, mostly at the end.
On 22 Jan 2001 08:49:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon, Steve, PhD)
wrote:
> Apparently, this message did not
I am looking for an advice on a good textbook in measure and
probability. Most graduate level textbooks that I have seen just lay
out definitions and theorems and do not give any intuition behind those
definitions. I am looking for a textbook that does more. For example,
I would like to see an in
duncan ... glad you mentioned that ... and, i too got a little huffy when
i read this ... after all, it is a public site ... freely available to
all ... and, the stuff on this page about the 3 "papers" in
PCPro (by the way ... i did a good search and could not find anything
about this publication
On 28 Jan 2001 04:04:04 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konrad
Halupka) wrote:
>Look up three papers which have been previously published in the PCPRo,
>all by the same author, I guess.
>
>http://www.woodleyside.co.uk/stats.htm
>
>(no passwords, but even quoting is "strictly forbidden")
The first of
Gerry Dizinno wrote:
>
> A while back someone posted a reference to an article (actually a web site
> that referenced the article) that purported to identify some serious errors
> associated with the statistical functions of Excel.
Look up three papers which have been previously published in th
I used the expression below as suggested by Donald:
A2 =( - [long expression]/n) - n
but still getting some fairly large values.
thanks
Veeral
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of I
Jay
> One piece of advice I received on this topic was: Use DeltaGraph. Even
> 4.0 (ca 1997) offers more options, and display control.
> Sorry if that isn't exactly what you were looking for
The problem, as always is money. Otherwise I agree that something like
Deltagraph is the solutio
13 matches
Mail list logo
