Re: Inequalities constrains on the coefficients

2000-06-03 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ecessary -- or, for that matter, make much sense. > Is there something on MatLab/STATA/SAS for that? I don't know. Maybe someone else does. -- DFB. ---

Re: correlation coefficient for a curve fit equation

2000-06-03 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ls and sum the squares, and then find the percentage reduction > > in the sum of squared residuals from the curve as compared to > > residuals from the mean. This will be a kind of "r^2" whose square > > root you can take (after converting to a decimal fraction). >

Re: Question about hypergeometric distribution.

2000-06-02 Thread Donald F. Burrill
the equation you assert above without proof. One presumes you did not just pull it "out of the blue" -- but then, perhaps one is being presumptuous. -- DFB. ---

Re: standardizing diff rating metrics

2000-06-02 Thread Donald F. Burrill
as something about the context that gave implicit meaning, possibly even anchors of a sort, to the response medium. If there was, you haven't so far described it. -- DFB. --

Re: multivariate statistics.

2000-06-01 Thread Donald F. Burrill
what it was you were calculating kurtosis of, for example. > Any advice would be greatly appreciated! > > Claire Not sure I have any _advice_ -- what I seem to be offering mainly is puzzlement. But perhaps even that will help, a little.

Re: correlation coefficient for a curve fit equation

2000-05-31 Thread Donald F. Burrill
the residuals against x and look at them. This > should show up any systematic deviations. Right. And any such deviations will indicate how poorly the function in question (1/y or its competitor) represents the lurking funct

Re: Need help

2000-05-31 Thread Donald F. Burrill
---------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110

Re: VIF

2000-05-31 Thread Donald F. Burrill
On Wed, 31 May 2000, jineshwar singh wrote: > --- "Donald F. Burrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I knew I'd written that... It took me a while to find it, but the sole addition I could find in your post was the statement VIF=10 is based on empirical d

Re: I need Help!!

2000-05-31 Thread Donald F. Burrill
est. [I] I agree with Robert Dawson about the phrasing of the problem, and a certain part is stated, in my view, imprecisely at best. This is however a terminological quibble and does not affect the calculations that are required. -- DFB.

Re: I need Help!!

2000-05-31 Thread Donald F. Burrill
nse; it's yet another if you think you know (or know of) an appropriate procedure, but don't see how to apply it in this case; for example. -- DFB. Donald

Re: VIF

2000-05-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
per variable one is supposed to have before one dares essay a factor analysis)? -- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROT

RE: VIF

2000-05-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
"cutoff", and whether you propose to implement it blindly and without further thought, or as a (very!) rough guideline regarding where the currents (and perhaps the undertow) may be dangerous and REQUIRE further thought; just for two examples. -- Don. --

Re: partial least squares regression

2000-05-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
of the products (or raw variables) they're residuals from. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: question about minitab

2000-05-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
in Linear Regression," Biometrics 32, pp. 1-49. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Bedf

Re: sas vs s-plus for qc (fwd)

2000-05-29 Thread Donald F. Burrill
Sorry, all; my attempt to mail this to "Ken K." directly failed. Presumably he reads the list, since he posted to it. -- DFB. ---- Donald

Re: help with frequency tables?

2000-05-24 Thread Donald F. Burrill
alf percentage points. This implies that at the p = .01 level you suggest, you can tell the 3% for the fourth category above from the 7% for the third category, but possibly not from the (say) 2% for the fifth category, with 2500 respondents. Do you still think you want a decent stabilit

Re: Qualitative analysis

2000-05-23 Thread Donald F. Burrill
h industry(ies)? -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264

Re: Cumulative Frequency Polygons a right way?

2000-05-22 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ck one whose author(s) happen to be well-known in the field in which these folks think they operate. (But make sure the authors' logic is correct!) -- DFB. Donald F. Burrill

Re: Signal detection: signal, noise and a 2nd signal?

2000-05-20 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ed per > subject and stimulus. But since we are still in the design stage, this > would not be a great difficulty. Perhaps this conceptualization will help you to approach the various possibilities. I am out of time now... -- DFB.

Re: Regression and Correlation (Was Correlation)

2000-05-19 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ranges of X and Y. -------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road,

Calibration (was: Correlation)

2000-05-19 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ant sampling distribution empirically. But it is not at all clear, as several others have remarked, that your problem is usefully addressed by measuring or comparing correlations. < snip, the rest > -- DFB. --------

Re: Correlation

2000-05-18 Thread Donald F. Burrill
y that may not be reproducible in subsequently observed samples, depending as it does on the sample means and variances in the present sample. I hope this has not been too confusing; but you did ask! -- DFB. --------

Re: ANOVA: planned comparisons

2000-05-17 Thread Donald F. Burrill
in the first 3... the others are there just because they > sum up to the SS of "Periods". They could have been Spring vs Others and > Summer vs Winter or Summer vs Others and Spring vs Winter... whatever... < snip, the rest > -- DFB.

RE: homogeneity of variances

2000-05-15 Thread Donald F. Burrill
-the-mark my comments > are!) I hope this hasn't added to your confusion! If I have inadvertently erred in any of the particulars above, doubtless someone on the list will correct my error(s). -- DFB.

Re: SPSS GLM - between * within factor interactions

2000-05-10 Thread Donald F. Burrill
-- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110

Re: bipolar factors

2000-05-10 Thread Donald F. Burrill
se items are associated with low scores on the items that loaded positively on the factor.) -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 H

Re: misusing stats: examples

2000-05-09 Thread Donald F. Burrill
hinking. Some of the errors are essentially statistical; but even the ones that aren't ought to be in every teaching statistician's armamentarium of bad examples. -- Don. ---

Re: PCA and stopping rules

2000-05-08 Thread Donald F. Burrill
A nice pun!(-: --DFB. -------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264

Re: one-tailed vs. two-tailed tests

2000-05-08 Thread Donald F. Burrill
both assertions should be included in the statement of H_0. > All we need is the relationship between the alternative hypothesis and > the null hypothesis. ... Once one has decided on a suitable set of null and alternative hypotheses. < snip, the rest >

Re: one-tailed vs. two-tailed tests

2000-05-07 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ion be more severe than the risk associated with a type I error in the other direction, and we thought we could quantify the relative risks.) -- DFB. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyd

Re: Problem?

2000-05-07 Thread Donald F. Burrill
th the mean standard deviations between each > treatment and that expected by chance? This does not make a whole lot of sense to me. > t-Tests? Possibly; see above. ---- Donald F. Burrill

Re: PCA and stopping rules

2000-05-06 Thread Donald F. Burrill
;CSC Graduate Student > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- DFB. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264

Re: no correlation assumption among X's in MLR

2000-05-05 Thread Donald F. Burrill
aps misleadingly) large, and a pattern of correlations reflecting an exact linear dependency (that is, a collinearity) in the predictors. The _problem_ is with collinearity; the _evidence_ of possible collinearity lies in the R matrix. It is not correct to _identify_ collinearity with correlation (or vice versa,

Re: log transformation

2000-05-04 Thread Donald F. Burrill
e might want to pursue more intensively. Time for class, gotta run. Just a thought, I haven't reflected deeply on it. Best regards! -- Don. ------------ Donald F. B

Re: log transformation

2000-05-03 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ore finding an average ratio of Y|X=1 to Y|X=0 ? -- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College,

Re: Number of factors to be extracted

2000-05-02 Thread Donald F. Burrill
Cheers! -- Don. -------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Pl

Re: no correlation assumption among X's in MLR

2000-05-01 Thread Donald F. Burrill
inverting a pxp submatrix of predictors: the simple linear regression coefficient for predicting Y from X_j alone would be unaffected by the presence of other predictors in the model. -- Don. ------------

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-04-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
untouched by the human mind", as Heidi Kass used to put it ... > and generate GIGO, that certainly is dangerous. Ayuh. -- DFB. > Ellen Hertz Donald F. Bu

Re: Unbalance Nested (Hierarchical) Design

2000-04-28 Thread Donald F. Burrill
of A and of B. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Be

Re: no correlation assumption among X's in MLR

2000-04-28 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ish to address, and the real predictors one has ARE correlated, what does one do? Throw up one's hands in despair and wail, "It can't be done!" ? -- DFB. -----------

Re: Statistical Software

2000-04-28 Thread Donald F. Burrill
lieve there is a special deal available from Minitab; perhaps one of my colleagues whose knowledge is more immediate than mine will care to comment. -- DFB. ----------

Re: Degrees of Freedom

2000-04-27 Thread Donald F. Burrill
xperiments? Yes. > If you want to answer could you please forward the response to my > e-mail address and I can forward them to her. Done. > Thanks, You're welcome.

Re: Q: error on RMS, __please__ help.

2000-04-27 Thread Donald F. Burrill
at > produced them. > > Why do you think there may be error in the measurements, and how would > you detect it if there were? Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 34

Re: Blackjack problem

2000-04-27 Thread Donald F. Burrill
strategy, among a very large number of possible strategies, can have this effect; and that Players showing evidence of pursuing such a strategy very rapidly become persona non grata at the gaming tables. -- DFB. -----------

Re: Regression with alternatives

2000-04-27 Thread Donald F. Burrill
if this is a trivial question ... -- DFB. ---- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] M

Re: Text for Transition Course 1/2 POM 1/2 Stats

2000-04-26 Thread Donald F. Burrill
-- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 6

Re: Part versus partial correlation

2000-04-26 Thread Donald F. Burrill
lation? Ah. For _that_, you'd probably get more interesting answers from your client's instructor than from me. I don't even believe in residualized gain scores (used in G&H's sole example of part correlation).

Re: Advice ANOVA t-test

2000-04-24 Thread Donald F. Burrill
he were ever going to carry out the research she had in mind in the first place. > This is my first crack at this type of research, and any help in this > regard would be greatly appreciated. Hope this has helped some. -- DFB. -

Re: Which Way Should We Go

2000-04-24 Thread Donald F. Burrill
this question in any case. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Example of transformation of waste materials needed

2000-04-23 Thread Donald F. Burrill
n"; but perhaps you meant something else. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMA

Re: Logistic

2000-04-23 Thread Donald F. Burrill
on without 'em): use them to identify subgroups from which to sample. More than that it is not possible to suggest with the paucity of information supplied. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill

Re: categorical data analysis

2000-04-22 Thread Donald F. Burrill
specification of a null hypothesis is to be able to specify a sampling distribution for the statistic being observed in the state "Hypothesis true". This then makes it possible to describe (estimate) the probability that one's data are consistent with the null hypothesis, and

Re: categorical data analysis

2000-04-22 Thread Donald F. Burrill
2x2 table. You've only got one degree of freedom for detecting whether there is ANY relationship of any kind; you have zero d.f. for detecting whether a relationship, once found, is of one kind or another. > The significance of null_2 is (I+D-2*t)/N See comments above on

Re: Sample Size Question

2000-04-20 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ituation; although it is quite possible that some folks would insist on one or another.) ---- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] M

Re: Split half coefficient?

2000-04-16 Thread Donald F. Burrill
- DFB. ---- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH

Re: hyp testing

2000-04-15 Thread Donald F. Burrill
x27;t need persuasive reasons to DO it, only to support your arguments with colleagues and editors that a non-standard procedure like this is defensible.) A one-sided test is merely an extreme form of an asymmetric two-sided test.) -- Don. --

Re: linear model or interactive model?

2000-04-15 Thread Donald F. Burrill
sure whether this will help, because I'm still not sure I understand what you're trying to ask; however, I do think I understand the two answers I've seen offered. -- DFB. -

Re: partitioning error variance in linear regression

2000-04-15 Thread Donald F. Burrill
you want some other kind of partition? If so, you'll have to model it. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall

Re: cluster analysis in one-dimensional "circular" space

2000-04-15 Thread Donald F. Burrill
he existence of clustering. Plotting this against, say, angular dispacement would give information about the location(s) of cluster(s). -- DFB. ------------ Do

Re: summing standard errors within polynomial regression

2000-04-13 Thread Donald F. Burrill
opinion I would be most appreciative as I am a bit > stumped on this one...........thank you...dale glaser Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, N

Re: How do you demonstrate Var[x]<= 1/4 on the interval [0,1]

2000-04-13 Thread Donald F. Burrill
you wish to consider other distributions on [0,1], permitting intermediate values of the variable, it's a little more difficult. Do you want further conversation? -- DFB. ------

Re: hyp testing

2000-04-11 Thread Donald F. Burrill
d this contretemps by resampling techniques; but I suspect that a careful examination of the logic of resampling applied to one of Bob's situations would show an implicit and possibly hidden attribution of infinitesimal probability to the value corresponding to "0".)

Re: hyp testing

2000-04-10 Thread Donald F. Burrill
rnative hypothesis(-es) that are to be considered simultaneously. -- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC

Re: hyp testing

2000-04-07 Thread Donald F. Burrill
Dennis' 3 questions above by finding confidence intervals, one is reintroducing hypothesis tests, as it were by a back door.] -- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PRO

Re: prediction of future individual values with a linear mixed effects model

2000-04-07 Thread Donald F. Burrill
for serial correlation > alone, but how to deal with concomitant heteroscedasticty ? Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH

Re: comparing variances

2000-04-06 Thread Donald F. Burrill
It's more, I think, an issue in the interface (or intersection) between statistics and your substantive discipline. Most interesting questions are like that, I think. -- DFB. -

Re: how can seperate the normal distribution?

2000-04-06 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ulating the problem to more people can only be helpful...] -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth Stat

Re: comparing variances

2000-04-05 Thread Donald F. Burrill
what I am doing now. In what terms are you doing that? You have said above that the variable that appears less variable is the one with the greater variance. You can't be reporting _that_, or whoever you're reporting to would surely wonder (with some justification) if you

Re: norm pdf

2000-04-05 Thread Donald F. Burrill
lots display.) -- Don. -------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-5

Re: Out of sample prediction

2000-04-01 Thread Donald F. Burrill
marks about what is known about period 2, and assuming that it's qualitatively different from period 1, I'd be VERY skeptical... -- DFB. Donald F. Burrill [EMA

Re: Combining 2x2 tables

2000-03-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
f so what it is, is therefore unclear as well. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 60

Re: testing a coin flipper

2000-03-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
tantial > probability of obtaining 0 heads so empirically you obtain > lots of cells with 0,1,2 etc.). > > Given that, I have failed to come up with a statistic to test it. > > TIA for any pointers to help. > > Bob ---

Re: bivariate normal

2000-03-29 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ransparency indicates relatively fewer > points, opacity indicates relatively more points. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29,

Re: bivariate normal

2000-03-28 Thread Donald F. Burrill
normal density function. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua

Re: Relationship between 95% CI and t-test???

2000-03-28 Thread Donald F. Burrill
the population mean has that value. Notice that this is NOT the question you are implicitly asking when you compare TWO confidence intervals to see whether they overlap. ------------ Donald F. Burrill

Re: Calculator policy

2000-03-25 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ints prepared by the students themselves: except that the professor's supplied aids are likely to be more efficient. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Goodness of fit help needed

2000-03-25 Thread Donald F. Burrill
phrase "-lamba (a)" intended to be an exponent? (Perhaps they were, in your original post; my mailer does not handle superscripts or subscripts and requires strategems like k^2 or k**2 to represent the square of k , and e^[-lambda(a)] or exp[-lambda(a)] to represent

Re: log-Reg and colinearity

2000-03-24 Thread Donald F. Burrill
to retain, or are artifacts introduced by the way in which (some of) the variables were defined. -- DFB. -------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymo

Re: successive intervals?

2000-03-24 Thread Donald F. Burrill
he's offering a short course on dual scaling sometime soon, but I've forgotten the dates.) -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3

Re: Sample size: way tooo big?

2000-03-22 Thread Donald F. Burrill
rawing a sample. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 60

Re: do we need huge sample sizes?

2000-03-22 Thread Donald F. Burrill
on-respondents. Or by other factors involved in selecting the larger sample that were not present in selecting the smaller.) -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMA

Re: over and above

2000-03-21 Thread Donald F. Burrill
the student; I delighted in quoting the def'n and then stating its corollary: that I couldn't tell them how to get an A+!). -- Don. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College,

Re: Programs for Standard Deviation

2000-03-21 Thread Donald F. Burrill
tion(s) s/he has in mind. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264

Re: Multiple Comparison Correction in Multiple Regression

2000-03-18 Thread Donald F. Burrill
tation committee member). -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth

Re: Frequency multiresponse analysis

2000-03-17 Thread Donald F. Burrill
uch sense to talk about "the best extractions".) > Thank You. > > Lorenzo Camprini > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- DFB. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde

Re: Q: Repeated measures

2000-03-09 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ated measures > option? I am not familiar with SAS, and cannot address this question. -- DFB. Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: STATISTICA -- Bar graphs with bins

2000-03-08 Thread Donald F. Burrill
-- DFB. -------- Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110

Re: A question on hypothesis testing wrt a factor in a GLM model.

2000-03-05 Thread Donald F. Burrill
es the factor to the residual SS for a model that does not include the factor? ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264

Re: Collinearity and subtracting a constant from regressor.

2000-03-04 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ors; so I should think the above comments, which have only to do with (apparent) collinearity among the predictors, would be applicable in this case as well. -- DFB. Donald F. B

Re: University Question

2000-02-25 Thread Donald F. Burrill
LOL. Obviously, you have no clue what you're talking about. Mmm. Do you suppose, Lim, that things might be different in Singapore? ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, P

Re: statistical computing

2000-02-23 Thread Donald F. Burrill
re pulling everyone's leg (a distinct possibility, with that lot). (To have named it after Canada, and then to have acknowledged that, would have been to display a quite un-Canadian degree of national hubris. :-) --

Re: help with component of variance

2000-02-22 Thread Donald F. Burrill
> within the plot, and the labeled among plant, as the interaction? > > I hope i have been clear, in order to receive SOME HLP Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall

Re: Help! Avoiding Multiple Linear Regression

2000-02-15 Thread Donald F. Burrill
by the ratio of standard deviations (SD.y/SD.x) to obtain the "raw" regression slopes.) -- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill

Re: Linear Regression with known intercept

2000-02-12 Thread Donald F. Burrill
but the slope would not? ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 03264 603-535-2597 184 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110

Re: Help! Avoiding Multiple Linear Regression

2000-02-11 Thread Donald F. Burrill
n [1] to estimate B1; in [2] you will partial out both x2 and x3 in estimating B1, etc. > Please format your excellent answer using my little "schedule" jargon. ------------ Donald F. Burrill

Re: adjusting marks; W. Edwards Deming

2000-02-09 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ormance art. Don't know as I should expect a response... -- Don. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State Coll

Re: Max R-sq for Binary Data

2000-02-06 Thread Donald F. Burrill
"points" (and how many of them are there?) half of which would be zeroes etc.? Are we to understand that the half that are zero are randomly zero in some sense of "random"? Why? Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hal

Re: power and nonparametric tests

2000-02-06 Thread Donald F. Burrill
and infinite d.f. > Or maybe your confidence limits are for another distribution. The original post to which you were responding did not mention confidence limits at all; it dealt with power analysis. ------------ Do

Re: Shareware for Computing Significance Level?

2000-01-29 Thread Donald F. Burrill
ndrum attributed to A. Lincoln: "If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a horse have?" His answer: "Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one." Just so. -- DFB. D

Re: Shareware for Computing Significance Level?

2000-01-29 Thread Donald F. Burrill
some of them may be able to offer useful advice. -- DFB. ------------ Donald F. Burrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 348 Hyde Hall, Plymouth State College, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSC #29, Plymouth, NH 0

  1   2   >