Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I can believe someone would call it that, but I can believe other
: tests would be called that, too. You state this is, in reference
: to what test (what computer program, or what textbook)?
see my other post
: MANOVA is a canonical correlation problem.
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:28:21 -0400, Paige Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Elliot Cramer wrote:
> >
[ snip, question ]
> >
> > The test of parallelism in mancova is an equivalent test
I can believe someone would call it that, but I can believe other
tests would be called that, too. You sta
Elliot Cramer wrote:
>
> Gardburyb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : Hi all,
>
> : I'm new to the group. I'm doing my dissertation, and I am doing a canonical
> : correlation analysis. My question is, what is the best way to compare canonical
>
> The test of parallelism in mancova is an equivalent
Gardburyb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hi all,
: I'm new to the group. I'm doing my dissertation, and I am doing a canonical
: correlation analysis. My question is, what is the best way to compare canonical
The test of parallelism in mancova is an equivalent test
=
Hi all,
I'm new to the group. I'm doing my dissertation, and I am doing a canonical
correlation analysis. My question is, what is the best way to compare canonical
equations between groups. That is, I did a canonical on the sample overall, but
now I would like to see if there is a difference in c