Hi
We have demonstrations depicting the internal actions of the Maillard rotary
engine, and the first Wankel engine design that has the chamber rotating
around the piston.
We also have the Starapex engine, the Starluck engine, the Starnine engine
and the Crankwheel engine that have their interna
i don't want folks to think i am against research ... i am not. but, i do
honestly think that we do too much of it ... we force too much to be done
... we force "publishing" and, the only real criterion is ... were you able
to get it published (in a decent outlet of course)? not only that ... m
Neil,
You raise some excellent questions, and this has bugged
me for some time. SAS's creation of "least squares
means" (what a terrible name) has hurt this area.
I prefer to always refer to such quantities as
"predicted values" and to explain what they are
predicted for. And I usually predict
On 3 May 2001 09:46:12 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (R. Mark Sharp; Ext.
476) wrote:
> If there is a better venue for this question, please advise me.
- an epidemiology mailing list?
[ snip, much detail ]
> Time point 1Time point 2Time point 3Time point 4 Hosts
> Inf
Stanley110 wrote:
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> What is the physical significance or meaning regarding a manufacturing process
> whose output over an extended period of time has the same value for the
> arithmetic, geometric and harmonic mean of a property, its purity, for
> example? ... > Or
Donald Burrill writes:
>Thanks, Rich. My semi-automatic crap detector hits DELETE when it sees
>things like this anyway; but... did you notice that although SamFaz
>(or whoever, really) claims to cite a bill passed by the U.S. Congress
>he she or it is actually writing from Canada?
>
Ladies and Gentlemen,
What is the physical significance or meaning regarding a manufacturing process
whose output over an extended period of time has the same value for the
arithmetic, geometric and harmonic mean of a property, its purity, for
example?
What is the physical significance or mean
At 09:44 AM 5/4/01 -0700, Carl Huberty wrote:
> Why do articles appear in print when study methods, analyses,
> results, and conclusions are somewhat faulty? [This may be considered as
> a follow-up to an earlier edstat interchange.] My first, and perhaps
> overly critical, response is
> Carl Huberty wrote:
>
> Why do articles appear in print when study methods, analyses,
> results, and conclusions are somewhat faulty?... I can think of two
> reasons: 1) journal editors can not or do not send manuscripts to
> reviewers with statistical analysis expertise; and 2) manuscri
Why do articles appear in print when
study methods, analyses, results, and conclusions are somewhat faulty?
[This may be considered as a follow-up to an earlier edstat interchange.]
My first, and perhaps overly critical, response is that the editorial
practices are faulty. I don't f
Hi
On 3 May 2001, Warren Sarle wrote:
> Joel Best is a professor of sociology and criminal
> justice at the University of Delaware. This essay is
> excerpted from _Damned Lies and Statistics:
> Untangling Numbers From the Media, Politicians, and
> Activists_, just published by the University of
>
Herman Rubin wrote:
> I also doubt
> whether learning to compute answers gives any insight
> into the concepts, except for those with good research
> potential, and even there it tends to confuse.
It depends on what "learning to compute" means. (*I'm* saying this
in repsonse to a comment from Pr
Herman Rubin wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hello,
>
> >Would like to ask the design of experiment gurus to help me with the
> >following questions:
>
> >1. why designs for experiments should be orthogonal ?
>
> The computations get easier.
Als
Yes, I'v already thought of that. But the complement probability is also
hard for me. Can you help me?
ronghua
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available
I am fooling around with a paper that talks about how to "do inferences, like
constructing confidence intervals, with the bootstrap method for inference...
because the assumption of i.i.d erros is reasonable... also... it is unlikely
that the cumulative distribution functions of our estimators are
In article <9ctkri$fjvug$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Neville X. Elliven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Heiser wrote:
>>We seem to have a lot of recent questions involving combinations,
>>and probabilities of combinations.
>>I am puzzled.
>>Are these concepts no longer taught as a fundamental starting
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>Would like to ask the design of experiment gurus to help me with the
>following questions:
>1. why designs for experiments should be orthogonal ?
The computations get easier.
>2. which problems may I encounter if I use n
Since other respondents have given the "official"
answer which is an oversimplification that has
become dogma, and is too often offered up without
adequate explanation. For the most part the
desire for absolute orthogonality comes from the
pre-computer era when it was difficult to design
and anal
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kai Arzheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rodney Carr) writes:
>> The problem I am having is that I'm not sure what estimating method
>> to use. EQS implements a number of different methods (Maximum
>> Likelihood, Least Squares, GLS, etc). Unf
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff) writes:
|> 1. why designs for experiments should be orthogonal ?
|>
|> 2. which problems may I encounter if I use non-orthogonal design ?
Check out: http://www.sas.com/service/techsup/tnote/tnote_stat.html
Specifically: http://ftp.sas.co
On 4 May 2001 04:11:23 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Will Hopkins)
wrote:
>For example, I might believe that the individual's true score is 70 units,
>and that the likely range is +/- 10 units. So what describes
>"likely"? 90%, 95%, 99%...? Do Bayesians have any validated way to work
>that out?
When I read the
> quotation, I assumed the student had made an error in copying it. I went to the
> library and looked up the article the student had cited. There, in the
> journal's 1995 volume, was exactly the same sentence: "Every year s
Warren Sarle wrote:
It reminds me of the recent headline in The Sunday Times (a leading
UK newspaper) that taxes had tripled under the present UK
government. As a bonus, the tax level when the government took
power, and reported in the article as part of the argument, was
something around 37% of
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--DBD3C05A63C0BFD0F8B0E075
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
hello,
Orthogonality is very important because it is an insurance that the
estimation of the effect of a factor is not dependant or the o
I've gone to a lot of trouble to add Bayesian adjustment in a spreadsheet
for estimating confidence limits of an individual's true score when the
subject is assessed with a noisy test. I specify the prior belief simply
by stating a best guess of the true score, and its x% likely limits, with
Short answers below; which may or may not adequately address the lurking
questions you had in mind.
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Jeff wrote:
> Would like to ask [for] help with the following questions:
>
> 1. why designs for experiments should be orthogonal ?
So that results for each factor, and each
I rather think the problem is not adequately defined; but that may
merely reflect the fact that it's a homework problem, and homework
problems often require highly simplifying assumptions in order to be
addressed at all. See comments below.
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Adil Abubakar wrote:
> My name
David Heiser wrote:
>We seem to have a lot of recent questions involving combinations,
>and probabilities of combinations.
>I am puzzled.
>Are these concepts no longer taught as a fundamental starting point in stat?
I haven't seen a Combinatorics course in a college class
schedule in nearly twe
Hello,
Would like to ask the design of experiment gurus to help me with the
following questions:
1. why designs for experiments should be orthogonal ?
2. which problems may I encounter if I use non-orthogonal design ?
Thank you in advance.
-- Jeff
Ronghua Zhang wrote:
>Suppose there exist N distinct objects, each time get n objects out
>of them(these n objects must be different) and then put them back,
>keep sampling for k rounds, and at last, what is the
>probability of at least x distinct objects have been
>selected at least once?
Look
30 matches
Mail list logo
