Good Day All,
I have recently purchaced a Heil PR-781, plan on installing it into the
station in the next few days.
Looking at the Heil site it appears at one point they had EQ settings,
however the chart is no longer showing.
Can anyone that has a similar mic give some guidance for some startin
Has anyone figured out using the KXPA100 to drive the KPA500
73, K1LJO
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list
I am currently in the middle of converting a D-104 Eagle into a usable mic
and have had a bit of experience in the past with them. I am trying to
recapture a bit of the nostalgia from my early ham days. I paid too much
for it, but not only is the chrome flawless, but it came with the original
box
The easiest way to use an unamplified D-104 with the K3, or replace a
bad/noisy transistor preamp is this single FET circuit from W9AC:
http://72.52.250.47/images/D104.pdf
The single FET is uniquely suited for the high impedance crystal
element and "bias on the mic" power. When handled properly
D-104 microphones with the amplifier in the base work just fine with
modern rigs. Look at the bottom of the microphone - if it has a hole
with an adjustable potentiometer below the hole, it has the amplifier.
The Heil rebuild kit is not needed unless the mic element is bad. The
frequency shap
I might add that if one has an amplified D-104, but wants to remove the
dependency on the battery in the base, that single FET addition can
replace the amplifier in the mic. Yes, I have done that in one of my
D-104 mics. It also works for the K2 when the microphone configuration
header is wir
The "solution" is for the K3 to just tell the KAT500 what frequency it is on.
We have all this Elecraft equipment connected together but a lack of
"communication" between them is the problem.
Keith
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-to-KAT500-tp7583270p75
Keith -
I do not believe that is the problem. My K3 "tells" the KAT500 what
frequency it is on as soon as I change frequency on the K3 (or the
KPA500). If not cabled appropriately, then, of course the KAT500 needs a
bit of RF to know what frequency it is on.
The problem is that for some users,
I agree - once you have done the drudgery of setting the tune memories
up for the bands you use, the KPA500 should merely track the K3's VFO.
Seems to me that would be fool proof - maybe???
Change the operation of the AUTO MAN and BYP switches to:
AUTO - will tune anytime if needed
MAN - only
Dave,
The K3 does not tell the KAT500 what frequency it is on. It only tells what
band it is on and the KAT500 returns to the last frequency on the band.
Keith
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-to-KAT500-tp7583270p7583401.html
Sent from the Elecraft mai
Keith -
Thanks for that correction. Since I do not move around a lot on any given
band, that distinction did not even register with me.
Dave - K9FN
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, XE3/K5ENS wrote:
> Dave,
>
> The K3 does not tell the KAT500 what frequency it is on. It only tells
> what
>
I know very little about how all this works but my guess is that the problem
maybe in the timing of the KAT500 as to when it decides the K3 has QSY'd.
On SSB the frequency will vary quickly as you speak. If the KAT500 sees a
new frequency for too long of a time it may think the K3 has changed
fre
Brendon,
Yes, the chart is not showing here:
http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/dsp-settings/125-all-things-elecraft
I sent an email to the email address that was shown on that page in the footing
area.
Hoop
K9QJS
On Jan 28, 2014, at 3:58 , vk8fqrp wrote:
Good Day All,
I have recently
Hi,
I had a few problems in the past (builder's mistakes hi!) with my K2.
Today, I suspect that these problem affect the AGC on my K2 when setting
up the CAL HI and LO, my actuel readings are CAL HI set at 013 and CAL LO
set at 184 when U2 PIN5 is set to 3.8V.
I also found she using the K2 t
Hi all,
Improvements are being tested. In addition to better verification of the
frequency count, we're going to provide a way for the K3 to send the VFO
frequency to the KAT500 so it can pre-load the LC network as you tune. This
will all be done in firmware.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
On Jan 28, 2014,
Is it possible to pull band data off the KX3 and send it to the KAT500 so
it will follow the radio?
Thanks, Dan
--
KM6CQ
Dan Baker
www.km6cq.com
@danielbaker
DM09dn
SKCC: 8260 NAQCC: 6817
QSL via LoTW, eQSL, & Direct.
D-Star REF014C
Problem solved, ( as this could help some one) : _I re-loaded the 4.67
firmware _( the last one) and everything was normal again !
Elementary, my dear Watson !
You should listen to FT5ZM :they use K3's and K2's...
Best 73
Jacques de F9OJ
Le 27/01/2014 17:51, Jacques Gaudron a écrit :
Bill - I had this exact problem on my K2/100 during testing. Changing
C1 varied the power output, but the SWR was fixed at 9.9-1. The problem
was a short between the output of the two op-amps U5A and U5B that
amplify and buffer the forward and reflected voltages before they go to
the processo
Thanks for the additional info guys. I guess I should have posted that the
reason for me to revamp my D-104
was because the previous owner had did some surgery on the circuit board
and mic element. The 9V battery had leaked all over the board damaging it.
So with that I thought it was easier to
John,
Which Proset? If it is the ProSet-K2 or a ProSet-iC, then you should
use the electret element Heil uses in their microphone for Icom (those
with an -iC suffix).
OTOH, if you have the normal HC-5 (or HC-4) element in your ProSet, your
choice of the Heil dynamic element will work as you p
Hi,
I had a few problems in the past (builder's mistakes hi!) with my K2.
Today, I suspect that these problem affect the AGC on my K2 when setting
up the CAL HI and LO, my actuel readings are CAL HI set at 013 and CAL LO
set at 184 when U2 PIN5 is set to 3.8V.
I also found she using the K
J-F,
The AGC Threshold setting between 3.74 and 3.8 volts should work just
fine - do not exceed 3.8 volts. If set too low, the CAL S LO and CAL
S-HI settings get out of hand.
Your CAL S-LO setting of 182 is not unusual, but your CAL S-HI setting
is lower than usual - and that is the reason
Thanks for the tips !!!
I always use my XG1. I will try it again, but this time with the preamp on.
Regards,
JF VA2SS
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-AGC-and-CAL-HI-LO-value-question-tp7583412p7583414.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive
Another good net with lots of QRP stations. Forty participants in 31 minutes.
Here is the list:
Station NameQTH Rig S/N
KM4IK Ian GA K3 281
AE6JV BillCA
Looks like this was because volume turned up too high.
I have tended at times to run RF GAIN backed off quite a bit thus requiring a
hefty amount of volume of about 2 o'clock. I would then adjust RF Gain to the
level of volume I wanted.
It looks like some stations were strong enough to overcom
Whatever happened to the remote (move around the desk) control panel?
Any ideas when it will be available? Hope it is stand alone and not
something that requires a computer.
Thanks,
Bill W2BLC K-Line (???)
__
Elecraft mailing list
Hom
Thanks much for your thoughtful and informative reply, Jim. My comments
are interspersed.
On 1/26/2014 10:32 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
Some other thoughts. It is critically important that the shield of all
cables be connected to the shielding enclosure at both ends, and ONLY
to the shielding enclosu
27 matches
Mail list logo