Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier Thoughts

2017-04-01 Thread K9MA
On 4/1/2017 09:22, John Perlick wrote: In the case of a solid state amp, the output is matched to 50 Ohms or so. Period. So any mismatch means that RF is reflected back into the ampwhere it is converted into heat. Depending on your SWR, that could be substantial! So let's say 3:1.

[Elecraft] Amplifier Thoughts

2017-04-01 Thread John Perlick
gt;> the same COMM port and the K3S is in USB mode with under CONFIG:RS232. >> Fldigi is not running when I use the Winlink software. I use the >> Elecraft supplied KUSB cable between the computer and the K3S. >> >> Can anyone give me a clue? >> >> Th

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Erik Basilier
Using my KAT500/KPA500 installation, I notice that I avoid using the tuner in AUTO mode, because the loud relays distract me when I am tuning around. In fact, I tend to disable the KAT500 and turn on the KAT100 in the K3. Therefore: A KAT1500 should either have sound absorbent materials built

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Ron Wilcox
ore careful design and >> installation of the entire antenna system. >> >> 73, Ron AC7AC >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of >> brian >> Sent: Tuesday, March 28,

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Rick WA6NHC
@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts KAT500 handles a much wider SWR range (like to about 10:1). Why do you assume people are lucky enough to have antennas with no more than a 3:1 SWR across the ham bands? Yes, higher SWR's require beefed up components but welcome to the real

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Oliver Dröse
And please do away with the 15 dB amplification limit for all sales outside the USA. Nobody else has that rule in place so we should not suffer from it. ;-) 73, Olli Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de Am 29.03.2017 um 01:00 schrieb Paul Van Dyke: Ralph Parker said my

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 12:11 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts On Wed,3/29/2017 11:47 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: > An SWR approaching 10:1 means high RF voltages on a coaxial line at > the voltage loops Remember that t

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Jim Brown
On Wed,3/29/2017 11:47 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: An SWR approaching 10:1 means high RF voltages on a coaxial line at the voltage loops Remember that the SWR on a transmission line, and thus the loss in the line, is determined ENTIRELY by the match between the antenna and the line, NOT

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
and installation of the entire antenna system. 73, Ron AC7AC -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of brian Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4:31 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts KAT500 handles

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread John Meade W2XS
I noticed the frequencies shown on the NXP web site for their reference circuits: 81.36 MHz 230 MHz 87.5 to 108 MHz and . 27 MHz! 73, John W2XS -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Amplifier-thoughts-tp7628611p7628620.html Sent from the Elecraft

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Arie Kleingeld PA3A
Who needs three boxes if it has a switching power supply and the amp itself has >90% efficiency? That would be a nice amp in the best Elecraft 'portable' tradition. This is the only 1.5kW linear I would consider buying as a replacement for my good old Commander. 73, Arie PA3A Op 29-3-2017

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Doug Smith
I cast my ballot for NO internal coupler. 1) An internal coupler is NOT needed by many who would rather not pay for something they don’t need. Sure, it could be optional but see points 2 and 3. 2) An internal coupler at 1.5 KW as anything beyond a trivial “line flattener” will be large. If

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread Phil Hystad
I used to own the 1 KW Icom PW1 linear amplifier. It included within its huge & heavy black box the switching power supply and the 3:1 antenna auto-tuner. I sold that amplifier because my eyes sparkled in delight with a much, much smaller desktop KPA500 from Elecraft. If this new 1.5 KW

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread David Bunte
John - I used to live in the world you do... but I now live in a neighborhood where I can't put up a tower, or even a multiband dipole. My 30' Flag Pole is OK, and, in fact, my neighbors think it is quite nice looking, but in order to use it on more than the one band where its unmatched SWR is

[Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-29 Thread j...@kk9a.com
I guess we live in different worlds. My 10m-20m beams have an SWR <1.2:1 anywhere in the band. I designed them this way and no luck is involved. the SWR is a little higher at the top of the band on my lower band antennas but certainly not in the 3:1+ range you are referring to. A 1kw+ Elecraft

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread Chris Tate - N6WM
Perhaps an installable option would satisfy all... -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John Marvin Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 9:12 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts Put me down as a vote

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread John Marvin
Put me down as a vote against a built-in antenna tuner. I prefer a separate external tuner that integrates well with the amplifier. It allows for a lot more configuration flexibility. 73 John AC0ZG On 3/28/2017 5:00 PM, Paul Van Dyke wrote: Ralph Parker said my list. 1500w output, 160 -

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread Matthew Cook
You can always use impedance transformers to bring your match back within the "impedance range" of your tuner. These cost far less per unit price than the components required to beef up an internal tuner to handle impedance's of 500-800 ohms or more (or the conjugate) with a solid state amp. A

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread Dave AD6A
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of brian Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 4:31 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts KAT500 handles a much wider SWR range (like to about 10:1). Why do you assume people are lucky enough to have antennas with no more than

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread brian
KAT500 handles a much wider SWR range (like to about 10:1). Why do you assume people are lucky enough to have antennas with no more than a 3:1 SWR across the ham bands? Yes, higher SWR's require beefed up components but welcome to the real world. 73 de Brian/K3KO On 3/28/2017 23:00 PM,

[Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread Paul Van Dyke
Ralph Parker said my list. 1500w output, 160 - 6m. 2 inputs. 4 outputs (Manual switching is OK). Built-in antenna tuner (good for 3:1 SWR). Reasonably quiet fans. Separate p/s, or remote control head (space considerations. :-) Paul. KB9AVO​ On Mar 28, 2017 4:40 PM, "Ralph Parker"

Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier thoughts

2017-03-28 Thread Ralph Parker
I better post this before I'm too late. I'd like: All the features of my KPA500, plus 1500w output, 160 - 6m. 2 inputs. 2 outputs (or more. Manual switching is OK). Built-in antenna tuner (good for 3:1 SWR). Reasonably quiet fans. Separate p/s, or remote control head (space considerations).