PM
> To: Elecraft Reflector
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] M0XDF: Re: What difference?
>
> Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
> > I apologize again for any lack in prompt communications of our K3
> > shipping status. We get over optimistic at times, and to be honest, some
>
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
I apologize again for any lack in prompt communications of our K3
shipping status. We get over optimistic at times, and to be honest, some
of the problems with suppliers cropped up just during the past week,
while I was in Japan.
Throughout this somewhat
I apologize again for any lack in prompt communications of our K3
shipping status. We get over optimistic at times, and to be honest, some
of the problems with suppliers cropped up just during the past week,
while I was in Japan.
Yes, we're a relatively small Ham Radio company, and we are fiel
> the lack of communication about the delays. As Julian chose to omit from his
> pithy comments, I did note that it appears Wayne and Eric have solved that
> problem.
So why prolong the thread by going on about it?
--
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ???
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Ham-Direct
Toby -
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
Regards & 73,
Steve
At 09:03 AM 8/31/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
> "How many people who have put down a deposit have done so
> if they knew that they radios would be shipped at least
> two months later than they original
CQ CQ CQ
Can we all relax a bit and stop bickering about the
delays, the lack of communications about them and
whether it's a Brit of Yank thing to 'claim one's
right' ?
Elecraft have acknowledged that they should have
more (and better) communications to their customers,
and they have indeed sent
Thom LaCosta wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote:
>
>>
>> If you're so dissatisfied with this, why don't you just ask for your
>> deposit back?
>
> Even betterhe could trade his place in line with someone who could
> reimburse him for his depositas there seem to be many folks
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote:
If you're so dissatisfied with this, why don't you just ask for your
deposit back?
Even betterhe could trade his place in line with someone who could reimburse
him for his depositas there seem to be many folks who not only understand
and acce
On 8/31/07, W2AGN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sure glad you suffixed your Anti-American sentiment with the :)
It was a legitimate response to Steve's dig at "the English
way".
> It is still a business, and should follow good business practices.
And I believe it does. But few businesses are pe
Julian G4ILO wrote:
>>From the size of your reply, Steve, I presume you are attempting to
> win the argument the American way. :)
Sure glad you suffixed your Anti-American sentiment with the :)
>
> I can't disagree with the points you raise. I just think that it is
> unreasonable to treat Elecr
>From the size of your reply, Steve, I presume you are attempting to
win the argument the American way. :)
I can't disagree with the points you raise. I just think that it is
unreasonable to treat Elecraft the same way you would a faceless
corporation or utility company. It is a a small company ru
Hallo,
> "How many people who have put down a deposit have done so
> if they knew that they radios would be shipped at least
> two months later than they originally thought?"
If one, two or three months, I am not in the least surprised by the delays.
I can not remember a single major product
I sold the 756 pro when the K3 was announced, and ordered one
right away.
I suspect many others sold their rig, or one of their better rigs
to pay for the K3. I think some even sold their K2 to get a K3!
I also thought the communication was very light, but put it down to
the small company bringin
Your points are well taken. I had rather expected the second announcement,
after the first. I guess I'm very English, a bit disappointed that I don't
yet have the K3, but hanging on, perhaps not quite desperate yet, but quiet
- yes!
I do understand about not getting a mail out - I am sometimes in
David -
I was watching a special about Pink Floyd last evening, and reference
was made to the line "Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English
way", and I thought of that as soon as I read your post. :-)
WRT "Didn't the e-mail say why", would any reasonable person think it
would be to
In a recent message, David Ferrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ...
Have I missed something here? Is there some list rule that says I should
sign my mails with my callsign, separate from my email address and plainly
at the bottom of every post?
What you have missed, David, is 1) keeping quotes
16 matches
Mail list logo