On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 09:30:55AM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> .. wasn't making an issue of it .. but I felt that the OP's choice of
> words did not reflect the attitude of ELinks developers .. and probably
> not the OP's exact opinion either.. he readily accepted my correcting
> him .. sounds like he
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 07:08:15AM EDT, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Wed, Jul 19, 2006:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:31:42PM EDT, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:10:42PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > > > Oh.. and as to developers being 'whimsical' r
cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Wed, Jul 19, 2006:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:31:42PM EDT, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:10:42PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > > Oh.. and as to developers being 'whimsical' relative to enhancements, I
> > > think not.. That's exactly why I bar
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:49:53PM EDT, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:44:41PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
[..]
> >
> > Not that I'm particularly happy with the keyboard either. The
> > traditional typewriter keyboard was bad enough but what IBM did to it is
> > beyon
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:44:41PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:31:42PM EDT, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:10:42PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > > I've also heard that the SpiderMonkey - the new mozilla has marked
> > > improvements in the area. But slow r
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:31:42PM EDT, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:10:42PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > I've also heard that the SpiderMonkey - the new mozilla has marked
> > improvements in the area. But slow rendering was only one of the
> > issues. I have switched to a ke
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:10:42PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> I've also heard that the SpiderMonkey - the new mozilla has marked
> improvements in the area. But slow rendering was only one of the
> issues. I have switched to a keyboard-only text-mode 'desktop' -
> interface, I should say and I am a
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:43:30PM EDT, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:36:29PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > OTOH doing the same thing in mozilla is quite slow on my machine.. not
> > because of the time it takes to fetch a new version but appently because
> > of the rendering (PII
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:36:29PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> OTOH doing the same thing in mozilla is quite slow on my machine.. not
> because of the time it takes to fetch a new version but appently because
> of the rendering (PIII 650MHz). This is one of the main reasons I have
> switched to elinks
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 02:05:35PM EDT, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
[..]
> Do the browsers with which you are familiar actually check every time
> when you view a document (presumably using the HTTP If-Modified-Since
> header) whether there is a newer copy on the server?
>
In mozilla it's
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:33:07PM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:25:16PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > My main browser is Firefox; I use ELinks under special circumstances.
> > Unfortunately, I'm really just a user and don't know how exactly Firefox
>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:25:16PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:05:35PM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Do the browsers with which you are familiar actually check every time
> > when you view a document (presumably using the HTTP If-Modif
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:05:35PM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> Looking at the document, I don't see any headers to indicate that ELinks
> should reload it:
>
>HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:42:19 GMT
>Server: Apache/1.3.34 (Unix) mod_gzip/1.3.26.1a
>Va
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:35:23AM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:32:19PM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:41:38PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:39:23AM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters
> > >
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:32:19PM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:41:38PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:39:23AM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters
> > wrote:
> > > Go to Setup -> Options manager -> Document -> Cache -> Igno
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:41:38PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:39:23AM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:54:28PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > > Hi. I've been using elinks for awhile now; it seems like the best of the
> >
Reid Rivenburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Sun, Jul 16, 2006:
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:26:11PM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> > Maybe we should make some of this into a FAQ since you are not the first
> > one to point this out.
>
> Oops, sorry, I guess I didn't dig deeply enough in the archives.
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:26:11PM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> Maybe we should make some of this into a FAQ since you are not the first
> one to point this out.
Oops, sorry, I guess I didn't dig deeply enough in the archives
Thanks for replying.
> ELinks' caching behaviour is not very confo
Reid Rivenburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Fri, Jul 14, 2006:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:39:23AM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> > Go to Setup -> Options manager -> Document -> Cache -> Ignore
> > cache-control info from server and set that option to 0.
>
> I forgot about that optio
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:39:23AM +, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:54:28PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> > Hi. I've been using elinks for awhile now; it seems like the best of the
> > text browsers. But I've noticed one problem, and I haven't seen any bu
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 03:54:28PM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote:
> Hi. I've been using elinks for awhile now; it seems like the best of the
> text browsers. But I've noticed one problem, and I haven't seen any bug
> reports or emails relating to it.
>
> I seem to be having cache problems. Whe
Hi. I've been using elinks for awhile now; it seems like the best of the
text browsers. But I've noticed one problem, and I haven't seen any bug
reports or emails relating to it.
I seem to be having cache problems. When I visit www.dailykos.com (for
example) and click to view an article, if I
22 matches
Mail list logo
