On 2015-04-24, at 08:19, Vikas Rawal wrote:
> I am revising a long book manuscript, and would like to mark parts of text
> (not just the headlines) just to remind myself that these need to be dealt
> with.
>
> What could be an the easy way of doing it?
Well, it seems that the thread went some
Titus von der Malsburg writes:
> `org-export-dispatch' is not anymore bound to C-c C-e. Instead C-c C-e
> triggers `outline-show-entry'. Seems like a bug because the
> documentation still says that C-c C-e should launch the export menu.
>
> Tested with git master.
No. You are using a patch I
Rasmus writes:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 15:16, Rasmus wrote:
>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
it appear in the agenda.
>>>
>>> E.g. "Sentence about BAR [TODO: add reference to FOO and check
QUIT
POST
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0fc8KGlZBY/hiuAUPyLuqJkSoEw=
Mark Edgington writes:
> Let me know if there's a workaround for this (apart from just "don't
> narrow the buffer"). Thanks!
It was fixed a while ago in master. Are you using
I've noticed a bug in org-mode's LaTeX exporting of footnotes when a
buffer is narrowed to a particular section. To reproduce, try to
export the following org-file to a LaTeX document, and inspect the
resulting LaTeX code -- it will have stripped the math environment off
of "\tau_s":
* Test Sect
John Kitchin wrote:
> I think what Eric is referring to is:
>
> #+latex_header: \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}
>
> @@latex:\ce{^{147}Pm}@@
>
> that exports for me.
>
> \nbsp{}^{147}Pm also seems to work, but might put an extra space in.
>
> you might prefer \phantom{}^{147}Pm
Or using the zero-wid
Hi all,
Actually, having pondered this whole annotation and task business while
heading home after work on the train, I think all I would like is a
simple annotation scheme with no need for tasks etc. We have plenty of
support for tasks with headlines. What we don't have is simple
annotations.
`org-export-dispatch' is not anymore bound to C-c C-e. Instead C-c C-e
triggers `outline-show-entry'. Seems like a bug because the
documentation still says that C-c C-e should launch the export menu.
Tested with git master.
Titus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Rasmus writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> That leads me to the next question: should we really mess with this?
>
> Maybe not. Perhaps there's a reason for the current implementation.
Agreed. However, it seems a good opportunity to alert the user to the
fact that Org didn't touch the table f
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks.
>
> Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks.
Is that a goal?
>> Its virtues are compactness, being similar to a list, being C-k friendly,
>> and, IMO, more intuitive.
>
> But, IMO, totally useless for general annotations.
Rasmus writes:
> Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks.
Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks.
> The tags. They are notes related to say a sentence, so you put a note at
> the end of a sentence. Spatial TODOs.
I still don't get it, sorry.
> Its virtues are compactness, being simila
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 15:16, Rasmus wrote:
>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>> I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
>>> it appear in the agenda.
>>
>> E.g. "Sentence about BAR [TODO: add reference to FOO and check BAZ]". I
>> don't need t
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes, but not
>> necessarily for longer notes, [@:NOTE] would be more convenient.
>
> This is very limited: you cannot write two paragraphs in your note.
Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks.
>> Though I
I think what Eric is referring to is:
#+latex_header: \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}
@@latex:\ce{^{147}Pm}@@
that exports for me.
\nbsp{}^{147}Pm also seems to work, but might put an extra space in.
you might prefer \phantom{}^{147}Pm
John
---
Professor John K
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 11:43, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> Apparently, chemists cannot do Emacs and/or org-mode when they want to
> prefix the super- bzw. sub-script without a kudge?
I've recently have had to start writing papers with significant amounts
of chemistry in them. I simply use the mh
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> I saw an earlier discussion about Emacs/org-mode superscript and
> subscript behavior. My issue is I want to do a chem isotope of an
> element. In standard Latex format I would do this:
>
> $^{147}$Pm or leaving off the $ and turning on Emacs' display of
> UTF-8 ( C-c
On Monday, 18 May 2015 at 15:16, Rasmus wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
[...]
>> I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
>> it appear in the agenda.
>
> E.g. "Sentence about BAR [TODO: add reference to FOO and check BAZ]". I
> don't need that in my agenda.
Exac
Rasmus writes:
> My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes, but not
> necessarily for longer notes, [@:NOTE] would be more convenient.
This is very limited: you cannot write two paragraphs in your note.
> Though I don't know what the "@" signifies.
AnnoTate?
> I think what
I saw an earlier discussion about Emacs/org-mode superscript and subscript
behavior. My issue is I want to do a chem isotope of an element. In
standard Latex format I would do this:
$^{147}$Pm or leaving off the $ and turning on Emacs' display of UTF-8 (
C-c C-x \ ) just ^{147}Pm
but it doesn't
Suvayu Ali writes:
> As for Rasmus's examples of similar behaviour in other modes, I don't
> like them either. Unfortunately again, I'm too short on time to fix the
> behaviour in my setup.
So far nobody has felt strongly enough about this to supply a patch, even
to org.texi or, I think, worg.
So this feature is on the way, it's already in a beta version, i.e., just
wait? I saw a rather involved work-around on emacs.stackexchange.com, but I
won't fool with it if this feature is soon to hit ELPA, which is how I get
my org-mode.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Subhan Michael Tindall <
s
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> During export (and preview (C-c C-v v)) the code block name is not
>> displayed.
>
> See `org-babel-exp-code-template'.
>
Thanks for looking into this.
If I get you correctly, you are suggesting a way to have the name
o
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:33:51PM +1000, Brett Witty wrote:
>
> While there can be a bit of a culture shock getting used to org's "do the
> useful thing" as opposed to "do the literal thing", I think it's an
> advantage of the system, not a disadvantage. Headers are sacred in
> org-mode, so break
I'm running version Org-mode version 8.2.7b (8.2.7b-2-g798733-elpa @, it's not
there in my version.
> -Original Message-
> From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+subhant=familycareinc@gnu.org
> [mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+subhant=familycareinc@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Thomas S. Dye
> Sent:
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> M-x org-version: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (8.2.10-40-gc763fa-elpa @
> ~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150511/)
>
> But I'm looking straight at the on-line manual, section "Export Options,"
> 12.3, and there is no "prop: Toggle inclusion of property drawers, or list
> properties t
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> But note that I am more interested in an inline noting/todo functionality
>> as opposed to annotation functionality.
>
> Inline noting is
>
>
> Text[@:1][@]
>
> * Annotations
>
> [@:1:] My note.
My guess would be that most notes are short. For such notes,
On 18 May 2015, Brett Witty wrote:
While there can be a bit of a culture shock getting used to org's "do the
useful thing" as opposed to "do the literal thing", I think it's an advantage
of the system, not a disadvantage. Headers are sacred in org-mode, so breaking
headers with RET seems subop
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> Kaviraj Kanagaraj wrote:
>>> I am facing a problem with converting org file to markdown. While
>>> converting i find html in it. but I want to be in github flavour markdown.
>>> Any ideas??.
>>> I have found that org-gfm.el would help.. But I d
Titus von der Malsburg writes:
> On 2015-05-17 Sun 14:15, Rasmus wrote:
With your behavior you can (i) break the TODO tag; (ii) break the
cookie; (iii) break the tag. At least (i) and (ii) are quite
destructive.
>>>
>>> I am not sure what you mean, since a single undo will alway
Rasmus writes:
> While we have opening and closing tags for formatting (e.g. bold), I
> dislike the above. It seems like asking for trouble; it would seem one
> could easily loose track and delete one end of the tag and not the other.
> IOW: [@:ID1]... [@:ID2]...[@]...[@] seems like asking for t
Hello,
Andreas Leha writes:
> During export (and preview (C-c C-v v)) the code block name is not
> displayed.
See `org-babel-exp-code-template'.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
windy writes:
> I am sorry for that but how to set the variable ? I totally know
> nothing about emacs elisp.
>
> maybe I must to learn it in some day. I try (setq
> org-export-filter-paragraph-functions nil) seems no working
Something like this
(defun my-ascii-unfill-paragraph (text backend
Hello,
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> Kaviraj Kanagaraj wrote:
>> I am facing a problem with converting org file to markdown. While
>> converting i find html in it. but I want to be in github flavour markdown.
>> Any ideas??.
>> I have found that org-gfm.el would help.. But I dont know how to setu
Rasmus writes:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> OK - this makes sense. But instead of jumping to the next line, a
>> splitting of the header into two would make more sense, keeping the
>> correct syntax.
>
> That is literally what my patch does IF you are in region four (more
> or less) of org-comp
Hi Sebastien,
Sebastien Vauban writes:
> Andreas Leha wrote:
>> for quite some time I've had the following in my .emacs:
>>
>> ;; This Snippet returns the name of the current source block.
>> ;; An elisp block to simplify the =:prologue= definition.
>> ;; Author: Eric Schulte
>> ;; It is useful t
M-x org-version: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (8.2.10-40-gc763fa-elpa @
~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150511/)
But I'm looking straight at the on-line manual, section "Export Options,"
12.3, and there is no "prop: Toggle inclusion of property drawers, or list
properties to include (‘org-export-with-properties’
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> We're just talking about annotations-plus-metadata here, right? Not
>> actual in-text TODOs?
>
> I'm not convinced in-text TODOs would be interesting, because they would
> make building the agenda an order of magnitude slower.
IM
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> That leads me to the next question: should we really mess with this?
Maybe not. Perhaps there's a reason for the current implementation.
—Rasmus
--
. . . It begins of course with The Internet. A Net of Peers
Rainer M Krug writes:
> OK - this makes sense. But instead of jumping to the next line, a
> splitting of the header into two would make more sense, keeping the
> correct syntax.
That is literally what my patch does IF you are in region four (more or
less) of org-complex-heading-regexp.
> Jumpin
Hi, everyone,
I am using org-plus-contrib/ox-bibtex.el to combine bibtex output in html
and latex.
When I use a same x.bib like:
#+BIBLIOGRAPHY: x unsrturl
it works well
But if I use a x.bib at different path and the src like:
#+BIBLIOGRAPHY: /home/name/dropbox/x unsrtu
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 21:44, Rasmus wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand what is misleading about the above? The note
>> is indeed intended to belong to the first item on the list.
>
> The misleading part, IMO, is that it is not obvious whether the
> inlinetasks belong
Thanks for you reply
I am sorry for that but how to set the variable ? I totally know nothing about
emacs elisp.
maybe I must to learn it in some day. I try (setq
org-export-filter-paragraph-functions nil) seems no working
在2015年05月18 15时18分, "Nicolas Goaziou"写道:
Hello,
windy writes:
>
Brett Witty writes:
> I agree with Rasmus' position. Just because the org format is plain text,
> doesn't mean the Emacs keybindings have to act identically to, say,
> Notepad. Otherwise, what's Emacs for? Similarly, I don't expect TAB to
> insert tabs into an org-mode document.
>
> While there c
Andreas Leha wrote:
> for quite some time I've had the following in my .emacs:
>
> ;; This Snippet returns the name of the current source block.
> ;; An elisp block to simplify the =:prologue= definition.
> ;; Author: Eric Schulte
> ;; It is useful to insert the debug message 'Entering foo()' as ou
Kaviraj Kanagaraj wrote:
> I am facing a problem with converting org file to markdown. While
> converting i find html in it. but I want to be in github flavour markdown.
> Any ideas??.
> I have found that org-gfm.el would help.. But I dont know how to setup
> custom backend for markdown export..
T
I agree with Rasmus' position. Just because the org format is plain text,
doesn't mean the Emacs keybindings have to act identically to, say,
Notepad. Otherwise, what's Emacs for? Similarly, I don't expect TAB to
insert tabs into an org-mode document.
While there can be a bit of a culture shock ge
Rasmus writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>> Consider this example:
>>>
>>> |---+---+---|
>>> | a | b | c |
>>> | d | e | f |
>>> |---+---+---|
>>> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>>> | 4 | 5 | 6 |
>>> |---+---+---|
>>> | 5 | 7 | 9 |
>>> #+TBLFM: @5=vsum(@II..@III)
[...]
>> What should happen to the formula if
Hello,
Simen Heggestøyl writes:
> When positioned at the end of an outline node, blocks will spill their
> background color (defined by the `org-block-end-line' face) when the
> node is folded.
>
> To see this, paste the following lines into an Org buffer, and make
> sure that a background color
Hello,
windy writes:
> Start from Org-mode 8, the plain text export is fixed width with line
> break and it is very unconvenient to show in the text edit like libreoffice
> and so on.
>
> I also try (setq org-ascii-text-width 10) in my .emacs but the title
> and the author align
49 matches
Mail list logo
