hi, Ihor,
i have a recurrence of the same problem. see below.
cheers, Greg
Subject: [BUG] still fails... [9.7-pre (release_9.6.29-1441-gaa71fa @
/home/minshall/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/)]
Fcc: outbox
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8; Emacs 30.0.50
>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Thanks! I have incorporated all your suggestions into the new version of
> the patch (attached).
Thanks, it looks good to me!
> Yes, it is. Applying diff is easy - easier than manually editing the
> changes according to comments in the email.
Great, good to know.
On 2024-05-17 05:22, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Fixed, on main.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=288c7069c
Thanks Kris for reporting, and thanks Rens for hunting down the cause!
Thanks for the prompt fix, Ihor! I tested it out and confirmed I'm not
seeing a blank
Joseph Turner writes:
>> You probably meant to link to some different ticket here.
>
> https://todo.sr.ht/~ushin/ushin/188
So, you want an equivalent of `org-safe-remote-resources'.
Generally, we might eventually move it to Emacs core, making a more
general Emacs safety framework with unified
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Joseph Turner writes:
>
>>> The case with hyperdrive.el is not the same.
>>> You may want to discuss it on emacs-devel.
>>
>> Thank you! It is a good idea to get more input on securing
>> hyperdrive.el. For now, I went through bug#58744 and took some notes in
>> two
The patch below replaces a use of `eval` with `apply`, but along the way
I wondered about some of the details of `org-eval-in-calendar` (see the
FIXMEs), the most important of them being: why doesn't it use
`with-selected-window`?
Assuming the change from `eval` to `apply` is OK, I'll upgrade my
Stefan Nobis writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> It does not have to be lost. We can adjust the repeater function to
>> handle negative dates/months specially, so that
>
>> [2024-05--1 +1m] -> [2024-06--1 +1m]
>
> Hmmm... I do not like, that here the wrong month is displayed. On a
> cursory
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> It does not have to be lost. We can adjust the repeater function to
> handle negative dates/months specially, so that
> [2024-05--1 +1m] -> [2024-06--1 +1m]
Hmmm... I do not like, that here the wrong month is displayed. On a
cursory look, it's easy to assume the wrong
Stefan Nobis writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> +1m! is awkward - what if [2024-05-12 +1m!]?
>
> You are right. I have not really spent time to think about a nice
> syntax. But I think it needs to be encoded in the increment part, not
> in the date part (because after the first increment,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> +1m! is awkward - what if [2024-05-12 +1m!]?
You are right. I have not really spent time to think about a nice
syntax. But I think it needs to be encoded in the increment part, not
in the date part (because after the first increment, the information
that we want the
Rustom Mody writes:
> But I'd still like to ask: What is the correct way of having *even the tex
> file* in the auxdir?
Well. `org-latex-pdf-process' should be the right place to poke
around. Org mode only cares about the produced file to be in the
expected place and nothing more.
--
Ihor
Max Nikulin writes:
+(defun org-time-inc (unit value time)
>>> Is there a chance that support of intervals like 1h20m will be required
>>> later?
>>
>> Not sure again. I simply used ts-inc function signature from Adam's
>> ts.el as reference.
>
> ts.el has `ts-adjust' that may change
Max Nikulin writes:
>>> On 13/05/2024 17:07, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
<2025-01-31 Fri +1m>
<2025-02-28 Fri +1m>
<2025-03-28 Fri +1m>
>>>
>>> Instead of using timestamp obtained on previous step, use original
>>> timestamp and multiple of the interval.
>>
>> This is not possible
Stefan Nobis writes:
> ...
> And even if we would have access to the original date: It may be
> something like the last day of February and from that alone it is not
> evident, wether e.g. the 28. of each month should be used or the last
> day of month.
>
> Therefore, I think, the only solution
Joseph Turner writes:
>> The case with hyperdrive.el is not the same.
>> You may want to discuss it on emacs-devel.
>
> Thank you! It is a good idea to get more input on securing
> hyperdrive.el. For now, I went through bug#58744 and took some notes in
> two relevant hyperdrive.el issues:
>
>
Joris Caravati writes:
>> An easier way would be forcing note earlier by calling
>> `org-add-log-note' from your hook.
>
> I remember trying that before adding the hook (and I tried again today)
> but the problem with adding the note directly is that I only seem to
> manage storing the note
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes:
> I often see a huge number of warnings while publishing my website with
> org-publish:
>
> Warning (org-element-cache): org-element--cache: Got empty parent while
> parsing.
> ...
> To reproduce (though I’m not sure whether this will work outside my
>
I often see a huge number of warnings while publishing my website with
org-publish:
Warning (org-element-cache): org-element--cache: Got empty parent while
parsing.
…
Backtrace:
nil
This doesn’t happen always. It seems to be the case more often when I
add a new org-file to my site.
To reproduce
Cletip Cletip writes:
> It's almost the same as described here:
> https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-12/msg00199.html. BUT,
> this only comes into play in the following case:
>
> Suppose you want to complete an org-capture template with this: “%^{Title}”.
> When you call this
Anand Deopurkar writes:
> From 8f603b721ddd7edf1e622a39dc80f4b74a5b5198 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Anand Deopurkar
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 20:39:51 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] lisp/org-capture.el: Restore org-store-link-plist
Applied, onto main.
Francesc Rocher writes:
> If you don't mind, I attach here the patch in its current state for
> reviewing purposes.
Sure. See my comments inline.
> +;; Author: Francesc Rocher
> +;; Maintainer: Francesc Rocher
If you can, please provide a contact email here.
> +
> +(require 'ob)
> +(require
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:27:04 -0700
> Cc: e...@gnu.org, emacs-de...@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter
>
> On 4/30/2024 4:39 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> > What happens if you have multiple providers for an URL?
> > You add the provider to the end, so it will have the lower
22 matches
Mail list logo
