Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Jonas Bernoulli writes: > Thanks for offering to help out Corwin! > >>> Speaking for myself, I can help: >>> [...] >>> - review the bonafides (experience/involvement and, via Eli/SM, >>> assignment status ) for prospective adopting maintainers >> >> Not sure about emacsorphanage side, but for

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Jonas Bernoulli writes: > Please make your "membership" public at > https://github.com/orgs/emacsorphanage/people. Done, thanks! -- Bastien Guerry

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Thanks for offering to help out Corwin! >> Speaking for myself, I can help: >> [...] >> - review the bonafides (experience/involvement and, via Eli/SM, >> assignment status ) for prospective adopting maintainers > > Not sure about emacsorphanage side, but for things we decide to manage > on

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien Guerry writes: > Sounds good to me too, I'm "bzg" on GitHub. Thanks! Invitation sent. Please make your "membership" public at https://github.com/orgs/emacsorphanage/people. Welcome! :D

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Hi Jonas, Jonas Bernoulli writes: > IMO it would be a good idea if Bastien and/or Ihor joined the > emacsorphanage and explicitly added themselves to these packages as > admins. > > I think I would have to make you owners of emacsorphanage to allow you > to do this and other useful things on

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Corwin Brust writes: > Hi all; I added worg co-curator krupalinbox to CC. I think you did not. I added him now. > I would be happy to help with administration here. I have a GitHub > account, as well as commit on bastian's sr.ht. > > In fact, I wonder if worg curators should have some

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Thanks, will continue there. On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 6:11 PM Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Hrvoje Nikšić writes: > > > Can we discuss the technical details in a separate email thread or > ticket? > > I opened an issue on github: > https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize/issues/47 > > -- > Ihor

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard page explicitly says that it is looking for a new maintainer at least since 9 months ago. (The author is in CC for this thread) Indeed, and i've been actively following this discussion. :-) i've only had one bite, in

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Jonas Bernoulli writes: >> What about https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard and >> https://github.com/nikclayton/ob-sql-mode ? > > Are you saying these packages are unmaintained and asking whether they > should be moved to the orphanage? https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard page explicitly

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Hi all; I added worg co-curator krupalinbox to CC. On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:41 AM Jonas Bernoulli wrote: > > Ihor Radchenko writes: > > > I may miss more org-related repositories from emacsorphanage list. > [SNIP] > > >> IMO it would be a good idea if Bastien and/or Ihor joined the > >>

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > What about https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard and > https://github.com/nikclayton/ob-sql-mode ? Are you saying these packages are unmaintained and asking whether they should be moved to the orphanage? When I feel like that about a package, I usually open an issue

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Jonas Bernoulli writes: > I think what we have now is a good compromise. We continue to use the > existing emacsorphanage for org-related packages, which previously were > maintained on github anyway. If more org-related packages are abandoned > and they already use github, then I will

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Jonas Bernoulli writes: > I just went through the list of packages mentioned there as being hosted > on https://github.com/emacsorphanage: Thanks! > - org-grep should be delisted as it found a new home at > https://sr.ht/~minshall/org-grep/ Fixed. https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg/commit/667e1142

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >>> Indeed, perhaps https://github.com/emacsorphanage is a good shelter >>> for Org orphan packages already. >> >> It is a good shelter, but I was hoping to promote Sourcehut and >> discourage people using Github to report issues in favour of Org

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > So, we now have https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html I just went through the list of packages mentioned there as being hosted on https://github.com/emacsorphanage: - org-grep should be delisted as it found a new home at https://sr.ht/~minshall/org-grep/ -

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

> > It seems to me it would be a good idea if Hrvoje gave one or more Org > maintainer commit access to this repository. Alternatively we could > maintain it at https://github.com/emacsorphanage/htmlize, and I could > take care of giving commit access, but in that case Hrvoje would also > have to

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Adding Jonas to the loop. > > For some more context, we are willing to help maintaining orphan > Org-related packages if the requests are submitted to Org mailing list. Thanks, and sorry I forgot about this. I'll have to think about it some more before I can make any

Re: Htmlize support, maintenance, and Org mode (was: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?)

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Jonas Bernoulli writes: > >> `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize >> but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests >> for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether. > > Hmm...

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Hrvoje Nikšić writes: > Can we discuss the technical details in a separate email thread or ticket? I opened an issue on github: https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize/issues/47 -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support

Re: Htmlize support, maintenance, and Org mode (was: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?)

Jonas Bernoulli writes: >> Hmm... Org has built-in htmlize support and I did not know that it is >> not maintained actively. > > I only installed htmlize because org-html-fontify-code told me to do so. > Should it not have done that? I did not have any version of htmlize > installed prior to

Re: Htmlize support, maintenance, and Org mode (was: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?)

[fyi that is probably not related: i use htmlize.el for functions it has that allow you to copy a region omitting invisible parts. e.g. partly folded magit. i haven't found other code that workd for that and myb rain could not construct any.] On 8/13/23, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Jonas

Htmlize support, maintenance, and Org mode (was: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?)

Jonas Bernoulli writes: > `htmlize' is currently maintained at https://github.com/hniksic/emacs-htmlize > but its maintainer hasn't been responding to any issues and pull-requests > for quite some time now and seems to be inactive on Github altogether. Hmm... Org has built-in htmlize support

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Bastien Guerry writes: > >>> are there reasons not to punt the orphanage issue to this emacs >>> orphanage (and, point to it from the org wiki)? on the one hand, "less >>> control". on the other, "less work" (even "globally", if things scale). >> >> Indeed, perhaps

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien Guerry writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Shall I create https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-orphan-packages ? > > Or better https://git.sr.ht/~org-orphanage/ as a new user, to where > Org orphan repos could be added. > > This would mimick emacsorphanage, which is a GitHub organization. +1 --

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: > Shall I create https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-orphan-packages ? Or better https://git.sr.ht/~org-orphanage/ as a new user, to where Org orphan repos could be added. This would mimick emacsorphanage, which is a GitHub organization. -- Bastien

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: >> Indeed, perhaps https://github.com/emacsorphanage is a good shelter >> for Org orphan packages already. > > It is a good shelter, but I was hoping to promote Sourcehut and > discourage people using Github to report issues in favour of Org mailing > list. I see, and I

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 04:51:01PM +, Ihor Radchenko wrote: [...] > It is a good shelter, but I was hoping to promote Sourcehut and > discourage people using Github to report issues in favour of Org mailing > list. <3 Thanks -- signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien Guerry writes: >> are there reasons not to punt the orphanage issue to this emacs >> orphanage (and, point to it from the org wiki)? on the one hand, "less >> control". on the other, "less work" (even "globally", if things scale). > > Indeed, perhaps https://github.com/emacsorphanage

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Hi Greg, Greg Minshall writes: > but, recently i was looking at org-grep, and found its new home: > > https://github.com/emacsorphanage/org-grep thanks - I added this to the org-orphanage.org page on Worg: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html Contributing to Worg is as easy as

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor, Bastien, et al., i am not really following this conversation. but, recently i was looking at org-grep, and found its new home: https://github.com/emacsorphanage/org-grep Ihor mentions the emacs orphange: > Should we extend the org-contrib's current idea to other Org-related >

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

what it it were made emacs-wide? and linked all over with "things you can do to contribute"? On 1/5/23, Bastien wrote: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > I am not sure why we need to wait with an optional offer. >>> >>> You mean, the optional offer of providing a proper shelter for orphan >>>

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: >>> I am not sure why we need to wait with an optional offer. >> >> You mean, the optional offer of providing a proper shelter for orphan >> packages? > > Yes. Well, if too few people care about Org orphan packages to document them on worg/org-orphanage.org I'm a bit

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: >> I am not sure why we need to wait with an optional offer. > > You mean, the optional offer of providing a proper shelter for orphan > packages? Yes. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Bastien writes: > >> To be sure that we are not miscommunicating, my point is that we can >> advertize https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html as a place where >> anyone can document orphan Org packages, then once there are enough >> packages on this page, we can

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: > To be sure that we are not miscommunicating, my point is that we can > advertize https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html as a place where > anyone can document orphan Org packages, then once there are enough > packages on this page, we can try solving the other problem,

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > I do not really expect much interest as long as the orphaned packages > keep working. And, more importantly, as long as the original package > source (like Github) does not direct users to Org ML. > > Package users are the most likely people who will be interested to

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> I do not think that it is a good idea: > > Fair enough. There seems to be very little interest in contributing > to https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html with abandoned Org > packages so far: I suggest we worry on enhancing this page once

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > I do not think that it is a good idea: Fair enough. There seems to be very little interest in contributing to https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html with abandoned Org packages so far: I suggest we worry on enhancing this page once there is enough contributions

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: >> 5. We can offer to move orphaned repositories to sr.ht under our control >>and mention that we can do minimal maintenance then. > > I'm not sure about this. > > Another idea is to rename org-contrib to org-orphanage and to offer to > add *.el files there? This way we make

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Bastien writes: > >> I think it is a very good idea and a natural evolution of org-contrib, >> thanks for suggesting this. >> ... >> We can announce this along with the Org 9.6 release. > > So, we now have https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html > > It is very bare

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: > I think it is a very good idea and a natural evolution of org-contrib, > thanks for suggesting this. > ... > We can announce this along with the Org 9.6 release. So, we now have https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html It is very bare bones. We can add the following: 1.

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: P.S. Does sourcehut have a notion of organizations? Not at the moment, but Drew recently blogged that the plan is to commence work on this soon: We also plan on tackling another long-awaited feature soon: user groups, or organizations. This and the other features

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Dear all, > > This email is inspired by recent request by org-vcard maintainer to > transfer maintenance to someone else: > https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard > > As a part of Org project (https://sr.ht/~bzg/org/), we currently have >

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Bastien writes: > I think it is a very good idea and a natural evolution of org-contrib, > thanks for suggesting this. > > If we move in this direction, "org-contrib" is probably not a good > name anymore: perhaps "org-stub"? "org-orphanage"? Other ideas? I am not sure if it is a good idea to

Re: [MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Hi Ihor, Ihor Radchenko writes: > WDYT? I think it is a very good idea and a natural evolution of org-contrib, thanks for suggesting this. If we move in this direction, "org-contrib" is probably not a good name anymore: perhaps "org-stub"? "org-orphanage"? Other ideas? We can announce this

[MAINTENANCE] Org orphanage?

Dear all, This email is inspired by recent request by org-vcard maintainer to transfer maintenance to someone else: https://github.com/flexibeast/org-vcard As a part of Org project (https://sr.ht/~bzg/org/), we currently have https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-contrib/: org-contrib: Contributed