"Cody Harris" writes:
> I was reading the docs and saw some what looks like some errant
> keystrokes in the manual, so here's a patch =]
Thanks! Applied to main as a0755ebcc.
Best,
Ihor
Applied.
I was reading the docs and saw some what looks like some errant keystrokes in
the manual, so here's a patch =]From 9742aad3f68620cca1d82789fcb0040b6a836e78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cody Harris
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 20:21:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] doc/org-manual.org: Fix a typo in the
Sebastian Miele writes:
> Kyle Meyer writes:
>> If we were to simply replace "six" with "nine", I think the
>> description could still be confusing because it's ambiguous whether
>> "between" includes the ends. (I would tend to read the above
>> description as exclusive.)
>
> At least for me,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> Sebastian Miele writes:
>>
>> But how about instead changing the first sentence of the "Range
>> references" section from
>>
>> You may reference a rectangular range of fields by specifying two
>> field references connected by two dots ‘..’.
>>
>> to
>>
>> You
Sebastian Miele writes:
>
> But how about instead changing the first sentence of the "Range
> references" section from
>
> You may reference a rectangular range of fields by specifying two
> field references connected by two dots ‘..’.
>
> to
>
> You may reference a rectangular range of
Kyle Meyer writes:
>
> Sebastian Miele writes:
>
> > In an example for Org table range references it says:
> >
> > ‘@2$1..@4$3’ six fields between these two fields (same as ‘A2..C4’)
>
> Oh, that mistake has been around for a long time.
>
> > However, it are nine fields instead of six.
>
> If
Sebastian Miele writes:
> In an example for Org table range references it says:
>
> ‘@2$1..@4$3’ six fields between these two fields (same as ‘A2..C4’)
Oh, that mistake has been around for a long time.
> However, it are nine fields instead of six.
If we were to simply replace "six" with
In an example for Org table range references it says:
‘@2$1..@4$3’ six fields between these two fields (same as ‘A2..C4’)
However, it are nine fields instead of six.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Noorul Islam wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, skip scp0...@gmail.com wrote:
The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp evaluation of variables
in the sample code,
The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp evaluation of variables
in the sample code,
#+begin_src sh :var file-name=(buffer-file-name) :exports both
wc -w $file
#+end_src
shouldn't
file-name=(buffer-file-name)
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, skip scp0...@gmail.com wrote:
The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp evaluation of variables
in the sample code,
#+begin_src sh :var file-name=(buffer-file-name) :exports
The info pages are a couple versions behind too.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Noorul Islam wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, skip scp0...@gmail.com wrote:
The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp
12 matches
Mail list logo
