> There are a few other people working on the problem of modeling material
> removal. Unfortunately it seems that our approaches are different enough
> that merging the projects would be difficult.
hi all,
I've done a bit of work modeling the stock as a signed-distance field.
I'm using the classi
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:56 PM, EBo wrote:
> On 4 January 2011 22:48, Mark wrote:
> >> I was assuming (from a position of ignorance) that there was
> >> something
> >> built in to OpenCascade that dod sweeps. My experience is purely in
> >> 3D
> >> CAD, and in those packages you can only sweep
On Jan 5, 2011 6:09 AM, "Anders Wallin" wrote:
>
> > There are a few other people working on the problem of modeling material
> > removal. Unfortunately it seems that our approaches are different enough
> > that merging the projects would be difficult.
>
> hi all,
>
> I've done a bit of work model
I'm going to be the release manager for 2.5. I'd like to make a
v2_5_branch some time soon, to start testing/stabilizing for the
eventual 2.5.0 release.
I'd like to use the same git workflow we used for 2.4: bugfix and
stabilizing changes will be made on v2_5_branch and merged
periodically into m
On 5 January 2011 15:23, Chris Radek wrote:
> If you have incomplete work in master, or work in a branch waiting to
> be merged into master, please respond here and we can figure out what
> to do. GladeVCP and pncconf are two areas where I know work is
> ongoing that I don't know much about.
Sm
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 06:10:04 -0500, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:56 PM, EBo wrote:
>>
>> What does it use? If it only uses a 2D projection, then use the
>> silhouette.
>
> Yes, that's what I'm trying to do with occ's hidden line removal.
> However, I
> ran into problems with the data
On 01/05/2011 08:37 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> My main concern with the sserial driver is that Seb expressed concerns
> about something I was doing, but I am not clear exactly what he didn't
> like. ("ioport munging scares me" was the phrase)
Sorry, that was vague. I just reacted to the sserial sub-d
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:37:33PM +, andy pugh wrote:
> The bldc component is an interesting quandry as to how it should be
> released, as it completely replaces both bldc_hall and bldc_sine.
I see that bldc_hall3 is in v2.4_branch, while bldc_sine is not.
We must keep compatibility with v2.
Thanks for taking the task of release manager this time around, Chris!
I see that Chris wrote a draft changelog for v2.5. Here are some more
ways to look at the differences between v2.4 and master:
The number of files and lines changed:
$ git diff --shortstat origin/v2.4_branch
575 files ch
On 5 January 2011 16:45, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Sorry, that was vague. I just reacted to the sserial sub-driver messing
> with the registers of another module (ioport in this case). That kind of
> cross-module dependency is something i tried to avoid.
Would it be preferable to move those
While poking around I came a cross some interesting papers that I
thought I would point out:
Campen, M. & Kobbelt, L. Polygonal Boundary Evaluation of Minkowski
Sums and Swept Volumes Computer Graphics Forum, 2010, 29, 1613-1622
Bommes, D. & Kobbelt, L. Accurate computation of geodesic dis
>
> I'm going to be the release manager for 2.5. I'd like to make a
> v2_5_branch some time soon, to start testing/stabilizing for the
> eventual 2.5.0 release.
>
Thanks to Jeff for his release managing up to this point!
> I'd like to use the same git workflow we used for 2.4: bugfix and
> s
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:37:33 +
andy pugh wrote:
> Smart Serial (8i20 and 7i64) support and the linked-but-separate
> combined bldc driver are ready to be distributed for wider testing.
> I would quite like to see both in 2.5 if possible. (There seems to be
> a fair few people keen to use the 8
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:39:40AM +, Chris Morley wrote:
> Thanks to Jeff for his release managing up to this point!
Agreed! I forget how many in a row he's done. It's about my turn
again. We couldn't seem to get anyone else suckered, er, talked into
doing it.
> Pncconf for 2.5 is in a
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:23:35AM -0600, Chris Radek wrote:
> If you have incomplete work in master, or work in a branch waiting to
> be merged into master, please respond here and we can figure out what
> to do. GladeVCP and pncconf are two areas where I know work is
> ongoing that I don't know
15 matches
Mail list logo
