In reading this, remember that anything I don't complain about looked
fine to me. Overall this looks like pretty good code (though I haven't
compiled it and of course have no hardware to test it on). Thanks for
your continuing efforts on this SPI stuff.
[-- Attachment #2:
I've been mulling over how to use later Fanuc brushless motors that have
the serial encoder.
I have gotten just a little bit of data about them. Apparently, they
send a 77-bit string at 100K bits/second.
So, the readout takes almost a ms. Now, a lot of people would want to
convert this to
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:39:45AM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
So, the readout takes almost a ms. Now, a lot of people would want to
convert this to quadrature.
One problem shows up immediately, they have 65K and 1 million count/rev
versions.
Converting it to intermediate quadrature seems
Chris Radek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:39:45AM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
So, the readout takes almost a ms. Now, a lot of people would want to
convert this to quadrature.
One problem shows up immediately, they have 65K and 1 million count/rev
versions.
Converting it to
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:56:21PM -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
Chris Radek wrote:
If nothing else this will fool a timestamp based sub-period velocity
estimate algorithm into giving you something crazy, which defeats
our new pid features.
Yes, bursting counts would ruin the timestamp
It would be convenient if you could teach your mailer to attach these as
text/plain or text/x-patch.
I can try not using Gmail.
but the hal function mesa_7i65 does both reading and writing in one go.
I did originally start with two functions and then combined them.
However, I think there is
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:26:49 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [PATCH] Add support for Hostmot2
On 28 April 2011 23:24, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
Yes, you must send to receive with SPI so unless you want to duplicate the
sending (Looking at the 7I43 timing I would think not) you need to reverse the
normal order of read write (for SPI only). This means that the read data is
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:29:26 +0100
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [PATCH] Add support for Hostmot2
I have been following this thread with great interest. I presume
the 7i49 (six-input resolver) is similarly affected due to its
use of SPI to the mothercard? Is this so? I have a 7i49 here
if it will help in any way (indirectly) with the 7i65.
Also, note that doubling the speed of the servo
On 29 April 2011 00:36, Kim Kirwan k...@kimkirwan.com wrote:
I have been following this thread with great interest. I presume
the 7i49 (six-input resolver) is similarly affected due to its
use of SPI to the mothercard? Is this so? I have a 7i49 here
if it will help in any way (indirectly) with
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Kim Kirwan wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:36:35 -0500
From: Kim Kirwan k...@kimkirwan.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] [PATCH] Add support for Hostmot2 Buffered SPI
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:26:49PM +0100, andy pugh wrote:
It would be convenient if you could teach your mailer to attach these as
text/plain or text/x-patch.
I can try not using Gmail.
Well, the trouble on my end is not *too* bad, just a few extra
keypresses.
The implementation I'd
On 4/28/2011 11:39 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
I've been mulling over how to use later Fanuc brushless motors that have
the serial encoder.
I have gotten just a little bit of data about them. Apparently, they
send a 77-bit string at 100K bits/second.
So, the readout takes almost a ms. Now, a lot
14 matches
Mail list logo
