Am 02.09.2013 um 05:36 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net:
I'm trying to make an updated MachineKit image for the BeagleBone using
the unified-build-candidate-2 branch as a base.
One issue I'm running into is the pru binary image has apparently moved
from rtlib/ to
On 9/2/2013 4:23 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 02.09.2013 um 05:36 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler
char...@steinkuehler.net:
I'm trying to make an updated MachineKit image for the BeagleBone
using the unified-build-candidate-2 branch as a base.
One issue I'm running into is the pru binary
What is the git status for what is going to become 2.6?
I'm switching away from the older xenomai builds in favor of the new
unified-build-candidate-2 branch. It looks like development on this is
mostly in MAH's github repo, but the branch appears in git.linuxcnc.org
as well.
I'm wondering what
On 09/02/2013 04:23 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
Am 02.09.2013 um 05:36 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler
char...@steinkuehler.net:
One issue I'm running into is the pru binary image has apparently
moved from rtlib/ to rtlib/xenomai.
the reason was the intent to package all binaries for a
On 9/2/2013 10:48 AM, John Morris wrote:
Somewhat OT for this thread, do we have both Xenomai and RT_PREEMPT
kernels for the BeagleBone? That would be pretty neat!
There are obviously xenomai kernels available.
I have not tried to make an RT_PREEMPT kernel for the 'Bone for a while,
but the
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 04:18:24PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
On 9/1/2013 3:51 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I'm not sure if bc should really be a dependency, but it seems like it
ought to at least be recommended.
Never mind...looks like this has already been fixed since the last
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I'm hacking a bit on the latency-test script because the default 25 uS
base thread causes the BeagleBone to hang (typical IRQ latency is 20-80
uS, so a 25 uS thread is really pushing things).
Yuck. Should the default base
On Monday 02 September 2013 23:18:36 Jon Elson did opine:
I'm not sure theis is the right method to bring this up, but...
I have had some discussions with Michael Haberler about having
the capability for making HAL threads triggerable via an
external interrupt. Apparently, there was a
I have always believed that a much better system would
result if the real time interrupts were driven from the
actual hardware that was collecting the feedback and
applying the driving functions. Yes, this means that
the real time system cannot run if the drivers for the
hardware don't correctly
Am 03.09.2013 um 05:41 schrieb Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com:
On Monday 02 September 2013 23:18:36 Jon Elson did opine:
I'm not sure theis is the right method to bring this up, but...
I have had some discussions with Michael Haberler about having
the capability for making HAL threads
Am 03.09.2013 um 05:43 schrieb Steve Stallings steve...@newsguy.com:
I have always believed that a much better system would
result if the real time interrupts were driven from the
actual hardware that was collecting the feedback and
applying the driving functions. Yes, this means that
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
