Re: [Emc-developers] [Emc-users] [ANNOUNCE] Machinekit project

2014-04-03 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 3-4-2014 17:20, andy pugh wrote: > On 3 April 2014 15:26, Michael Haberler wrote: >> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3]. > I have no idea what this means. > Progress (I hope). --

Re: [Emc-developers] BeagleBoard shifts to Debian

2014-03-31 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 1-4-2014 0:41, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > On 3/31/2014 4:35 PM, W. Martinjak wrote: >> http://beagleboard.org/latest-images/ >> >> I think this are good news. > I agree! > > I am working closely with Robert Nelson (the developer of the Debian > images), and am trying to get the various packag

Re: [Emc-developers] Driver Name and Configuration Directories

2014-01-16 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 15-1-2014 15:52, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > On 1/15/2014 7:55 AM, Bas de Bruijn wrote: >> Hi Charles, >> >> I'd like to support you with testing/adding to the lineardeltakins >> types of 3D printer. I recently added rudimentary M109 and M106 in >> the linuxcnc/nc_files directory. > Yes, there

Re: [Emc-developers] BeagleBone question

2013-02-06 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 6-2-2013 16:28, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 06 February 2013 10:08:34 Steve Stallings did opine: > Message additions Copyright Wednesday 06 February 2013 by Gene Heskett > >> http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/BeagleBoard-by-CircuitCo/BB-BONE-BBP >> R-01 /?qs=%2fha2pyFaduhuMLNU3HAk3tDdzt

Re: [Emc-developers] new beaglebone Xenomai kernel build (3.2.21/xenomai master)

2013-01-24 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 23-1-2013 23:25, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > On 1/23/2013 1:33 PM, Bas Laarhoven wrote: >> On 23-1-2013 19:52, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> Am 23.01.2013 um 16:17 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: >>> >>>> Since you have experience with patching xenomai on top

Re: [Emc-developers] new beaglebone Xenomai kernel build (3.2.21/xenomai master)

2013-01-23 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 23-1-2013 19:52, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 23.01.2013 um 16:17 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: > >> Since you have experience with patching xenomai on top of a kernel, is there >> any chance applying the patches on the 3.2.34 kernel? >> You can download that kernel fro

Re: [Emc-developers] new beaglebone Xenomai kernel build (3.2.21/xenomai master)

2013-01-23 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 23-1-2013 18:15, Michael Haberler wrote: > Bas, > > Am 23.01.2013 um 16:17 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: > >> On 23-1-2013 13:56, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> I had put out an updated BB xenomai kernel a few days ago, and I promptly >>> managed to loose the build n

Re: [Emc-developers] [Xenomai] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM - SUMMARY

2013-01-23 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 23-1-2013 11:22, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 23.01.2013 um 10:12 schrieb David Armstrong: > > On 21-1-2013 22:20, Michael Haberler wrote: >> I assume Bas will give the postmortem shortly - he nailed the issue; the >> RTC boot timewarp makes for a lost DHCP lease midflight and NFS

Re: [Emc-developers] new beaglebone Xenomai kernel build (3.2.21/xenomai master)

2013-01-23 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 23-1-2013 13:56, Michael Haberler wrote: > I had put out an updated BB xenomai kernel a few days ago, and I promptly > managed to loose the build notes. > > So I had to do it once more, and better documented this time: > > http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/linuxcnc-kernel.git/blob/c7422c10a84e122eb

Re: [Emc-developers] [Xenomai] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM - SUMMARY

2013-01-22 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 22-1-2013 13:36, Yishin Li wrote: > 從我的 iPhone 傳送 > > Bas Laarhoven 於 2013/1/22 下午8:07 寫道: > >> On 21-1-2013 22:20, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> Am 21.01.2013 um 20:10 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: >>> >>>> On 01/21/2013 02:32 PM, Michael H

Re: [Emc-developers] [Xenomai] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM - SUMMARY

2013-01-22 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 21-1-2013 22:20, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 21.01.2013 um 20:10 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > >> On 01/21/2013 02:32 PM, Michael Haberler wrote: >> >>> Am 21.01.2013 um 12:56 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > > question: does a RTC time warp have any possible bearing on > Xenomai opera

Re: [Emc-developers] BeagleBone DHCP Crashes - WORKAROUND please test !

2013-01-21 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 21-1-2013 18:06, Kent A. Reed wrote: > On 1/21/2013 6:18 AM, Bas Laarhoven wrote: >> <...> >> >> This is not the definite solution of course, but if confirmed we can >> work on a better fix (and don't forget to put the ntpdate file back >> where it

Re: [Emc-developers] BeagleBone DHCP Crashes - WORKAROUND please test !

2013-01-21 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 20-1-2013 18:31, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1/19/2013 8:57 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> I've setup Michael Haberler's network booting of my BeagleBone, and >> I seem to be having the same network crashing on DHCP lease >> renewal is

Re: [Emc-developers] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM

2013-01-20 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 20-1-2013 15:35, Michael Haberler wrote: > further to the Xenomai Beaglebone kernel hang: > > Gilles suggested to use the ipipe patch from xenomai master, and I gave that > a try; results so far look promising (xeno-regression-test still running). I > have no positive evidence this fixes the k

Re: [Emc-developers] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM

2013-01-20 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 20-1-2013 15:35, Michael Haberler wrote: > further to the Xenomai Beaglebone kernel hang: > > Gilles suggested to use the ipipe patch from xenomai master, and I gave that > a try; results so far look promising (xeno-regression-test still running). I > have no positive evidence this fixes the k

Re: [Emc-developers] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM

2013-01-17 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 17-1-2013 22:57, Kent A. Reed wrote: > On 1/17/2013 2:59 AM, Bas Laarhoven wrote: >> I think that running linuxcnc is mandatory for the lockup. After a dozen >> runs, it looks like I can reproduce the lockup with 100% certainty >> within one hour. >> Using the

[Emc-developers] Beaglebone Kernel Debugging, some hints

2013-01-17 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 17-1-2013 12:29, Michael Haberler wrote: > Hi Bas, > > would you mind post a minimum rundown for idiots like me on the list, or the > wiki page "How to use the JTAG port on the BB"? > > do you use the TI dev environment with the Eclipse clunker ;-? > > -m It's been a while... I've TI CCS inst

Re: [Emc-developers] "new RTOS" status: Scheduler (?) lockup on ARM

2013-01-17 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 16-1-2013 20:36, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 16.01.2013 um 17:45 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: > >> On 16-1-2013 15:15, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> ARM work: >>> >>> Several people have been able to get the Beaglebone ubuntu/xenomai setup >>> working

Re: [Emc-developers] "new RTOS" status

2013-01-16 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 16-1-2013 15:15, Michael Haberler wrote: > a short update: > > linuxcnc development branches: > > there are no more major breakage reports outstanding from several folks > having tried it, so the dust is settling. > > There are a few things left to do in the code: since there are several RT >

Re: [Emc-developers] xenomai on beaglebone : working 3.2.21 kernel running Ubuntu precise, latency

2012-12-06 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 7-12-2012 0:52, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 07.12.2012 um 00:37 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: > >> On 6-12-2012 23:37, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> and not so bad: >>> >>> $ /usr/xenomai/bin/latency >>> >>> RTT| 00:02:28 (periodic user-mo

Re: [Emc-developers] xenomai on beaglebone : working 3.2.21 kernel running Ubuntu precise, latency

2012-12-06 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 6-12-2012 23:37, Michael Haberler wrote: > and not so bad: > > $ /usr/xenomai/bin/latency > > RTT| 00:02:28 (periodic user-mode task, 1000 us period, priority 99) > RTH|lat min|lat avg|lat max|-overrun|---msw|---lat best|--lat > worst > RTD| 4.249| 5.124| 19.333|

Re: [Emc-developers] on the ARM builds

2012-12-04 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 4-12-2012 11:56, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/4/2012 4:41 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: >> A key element for an RT kernel of any kind is high-resolution >> timer support being in place in the kernel for results to make any >> sense. That c

Re: [Emc-developers] proof of concept: HAL module/driver for Beaglebone/ARM335x PRU realtime coprocessor

2012-11-29 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 29-11-2012 13:02, Michael Haberler wrote: > Am 29.11.2012 um 12:41 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: > >> On 29-11-2012 0:56, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> summary: high-speed HAL I/O without extra hardware & idle main cpu on TI >>> ARM335x omap processors >>> &g

Re: [Emc-developers] proof of concept: HAL module/driver for Beaglebone/ARM335x PRU realtime coprocessor

2012-11-29 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 29-11-2012 0:56, Michael Haberler wrote: > summary: high-speed HAL I/O without extra hardware & idle main cpu on TI > ARM335x omap processors > > -- > > ok, we have something working in HAL : > http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/shortlog/refs/heads/arm335x-hal-pru-module > > this adds

Re: [Emc-developers] Gladevcp+HAL standalone applications on Raspberry Pi: works

2012-11-22 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 21-11-2012 21:22, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bas Laarhoven wrote: >> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said >>> '

Re: [Emc-developers] Gladevcp+HAL standalone applications on Raspberry Pi: works

2012-11-22 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 21-11-2012 19:45, Michael Haberler wrote: > Bas, > > Am 21.11.2012 um 18:49 schrieb Bas Laarhoven: > >> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote: >>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL >>> standalone applications

Re: [Emc-developers] Gladevcp+HAL standalone applications on Raspberry Pi: works

2012-11-21 Thread Bas Laarhoven
On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote: > I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone > applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no motion > - more loudly > > that works and I can recommend looking into especially if the application

Re: [Emc-developers] HAL scheduling question

2008-06-03 Thread Bas Laarhoven
is is a practical requirement. I suggest you > focus on keeping the sample rate high and don't worry about jitter. > > Regards > > Darren Conway > > > Jon Elson wrote: >> Bas Laarhoven wrote: >> >>> Ah, thanks John, you made it very clear! So i

Re: [Emc-developers] HAL scheduling question

2008-06-01 Thread Bas Laarhoven
John Kasunich wrote: > Bas Laarhoven wrote: > >> A question for a guru who has in depth knowledge of the HAL scheduling >> mechanism: >> >> I'm developing a driver for a my servo motor controller. The interface >> is via a PC parallel port. Only

[Emc-developers] HAL scheduling question

2008-06-01 Thread Bas Laarhoven
A question for a guru who has in depth knowledge of the HAL scheduling mechanism: I'm developing a driver for a my servo motor controller. The interface is via a PC parallel port. Only one RT thread is used that processes the position feedback from the controller, and calculates the speed signa

[Emc-developers] Anybody using EVOREG motion controller nowadays?

2008-05-24 Thread Bas Laarhoven
[Sorry if this appears multiple times, have trouble posting to the list] Hi, While updating my own driver to use floats, I got confused by the hal_evoreg.c driver. It seems to use floats but does not register the update function as 'using floats'. Is this a bug or am I missing something? -- Bas