On 02/06/2013 09:45 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 2/6/2013 8:15 AM, Eric Keller wrote:
>> will it run a machine on a generic kernel? The closest would be
>> an rt-preempt kernel, is that standard with any distributions ? I
>> will admit to be confused, this discussion doesn't seem to talk
Am 06.02.2013 um 15:15 schrieb Eric Keller:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:08 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On 6 February 2013 13:25, John Morris wrote:
>>> Please ask questions about anything still
>>> unclear, and I promise a short answer.
>>
>> This seems to be close to (or possibly already there)
Am 06.02.2013 um 15:08 schrieb andy pugh:
> On 6 February 2013 13:25, John Morris wrote:
>> Please ask questions about anything still
>> unclear, and I promise a short answer.
>
> This seems to be close to (or possibly already there) a situation
> where LinuxCNC can be distributed as applicatio
On 2/6/2013 6:25 AM, John Morris wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 08:43 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> <...>well in fact that's what John is doing for RTAPI, with the
>> intent to arrive at a universal build that supports RTAI, Xenomai,
>> RT_PREEMPT and sim 'automagically'; that's not part of the current
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/6/2013 8:15 AM, Eric Keller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:08 AM, andy pugh
> wrote:
>
>> On 6 February 2013 13:25, John Morris wrote:
>>> Please ask questions about anything still unclear, and I
>>> promise a short answer.
>>
>> This seems
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:08 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 6 February 2013 13:25, John Morris wrote:
> > Please ask questions about anything still
> > unclear, and I promise a short answer.
>
> This seems to be close to (or possibly already there) a situation
> where LinuxCNC can be distributed as a
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013, at 06:25 AM, John Morris wrote:
>
> Looking inside the old RT implementations, it is clear that one was
> written first, and following implementations simply copied
> _rtapi.c and _ulapi.c into new files and replaced the
> RT system-specific code, a small portion of the ove
On 6 February 2013 13:25, John Morris wrote:
> Please ask questions about anything still
> unclear, and I promise a short answer.
This seems to be close to (or possibly already there) a situation
where LinuxCNC can be distributed as application-only to run on a
generic kernel.
However, if this
On 02/04/2013 08:43 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Am 04.02.2013 um 14:11 schrieb EBo:
>> On Feb 4 2013 4:18 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>>> Am 04.02.2013 um 11:29 schrieb EBo:
In the past, and I can read it between the lines now, that the
invasiveness of the modifications will take so muc
