Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-10 Thread Darren Conway
Hi >> 1 -- How long have you been involved in LinuxCNC? > About 5 years. > >> 2 -- Do you consider yourself to be heavily involved or only >> modestly involved? What is the nature of your involvement? As a >> developer? As a user? > Passive involvement. I intend to retrofit a lathe with CNC. I hav

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Matt Shaver
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:13:00 -0400 Kenneth Lerman wrote: > 3 -- So you believe that LinuxCNC should be actively promoted or that > it should be left alone to exist in peace? I don't think it needs TV commercials or anything like that :) I think if a company sold machine tools that use linuxcnc,

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/9/2013 9:13 AM, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > 1 -- How long have you been involved in LinuxCNC? About a year. > 2 -- Do you consider yourself to be heavily involved or only > modestly involved? What is the nature of your involvement? As a > developer?

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Steve Stallings
> -Original Message- > From: Kenneth Lerman [mailto:kenneth.ler...@se-ltd.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 10:13 AM > To: EMC developers; Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > Subject: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire > > 1 -- How long have you been involved

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Kenneth Lerman
Kent, You are, of course, correct. My thought was to solicit thoughts under one heading. I'd hate to ignore opinions from strong contributors just because they couldn't make it to Wichita. In retrospect, I probably should have started a discussion about what should be included in a questionair

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Jon Elson
Kenneth Lerman wrote: > 1 -- How long have you been involved in LinuxCNC? > 1997 > 2 -- Do you consider yourself to be heavily involved or only modestly > involved? What is the nature of your involvement? As a developer? As a > user? > > Moderately, I guess. I manufacture motion control in

Re: [Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Kent A. Reed
On 6/9/2013 10:13 AM, Kenneth Lerman wrote: > 4 -- Do you come to it as a free and excellent body of code available > for your own use or do you see it as part of what provides their livelihood? > > 5 -- Should it be protected by strong licensing from those who might > attempt to use it without con

[Emc-developers] Licensing Questionaire

2013-06-09 Thread Kenneth Lerman
I've snipped stuff from the top and bottom of Steve's post. My comments are below. On 6/8/2013 8:12 PM, Steve Stallings wrote: > > We should be so lucky. > > The LinuxCNC (nee EMC) community is a very diverse bunch. > > Some folks have been involved for only a few months, others > have been aroun