> Please tell us about the 'not clearly defined' issue. It isn't safe to
> say 'yes, use IEC 60664' without knowing the circumstances.
Well, the question was both specific & generic, if that makes any sense. And
I did know that whatever a final product standard calls out will supersede
what is i
This year's IEEE Product Safety Engineering
Society Symposium will be October 23-24 in
Irvine (Los Angeles area), California, USA.
The Symposium is the world's foremost product
safety engineering, compliance engineering,
and environmental compliance engineering
gathering. Experts from throughout
Dear Amund and Neil,
Thank you very much for your questions and comments. I cannot answer Amund's
questions at this time. However, I forward this e-mail to Ms. Bo (the Deputy
Director General of the Department for Certification, CNCA) and Ms. Lu (the
Deputy Director of the CQC). Both are VIPs
If the electronics is an integral part of the ship (radar etc) then RoHS in
all probability does not apply at all.
Regards,
Chris
_
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Amund Westin
Sent: 08 M
Amund,
The RoHS directive does not apply to equipment designed to be installed into
equipment that is not within the scope of the directive. As such, most forms
of transport, including shipping, is outside the scope and hence equipment
designed to installed in ships is also outside the scope.
r
Amund,
What an interesting question.
I would start from the perspective of equipment placed on the EU market.
Presumably an EU flag ship is EU owned, and therefore the electronics (even if
only as an integral part of the vessel) would be procured from within the EU,
and therefore would have been
Hi experts,
Having read the translated version of China RoHS regulations courtesy
Grace Lin, i seem to spot several
questions which needs answering.
1)
I see in that doc. no specification of limits for the materials, are
they same as in EU ?
And as a show stopper they add "Other toxic or hazar
All TEM devices are now in IEC 61000-4-20.
Ari
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
ext maddog 4030
Sent: 8. maaliskuuta 2006 16:36
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: re: Transition Times of Basic Standards
In message <20060308214055.94838.qm...@web31011.mail.mud.yahoo.com>,
dated Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Camille Good writes
>1) My understanding of the interrelation between different IEC
>standards is that IEC 60664-1, Insulation coordination for equipment
>within low-voltage systems, is considered to be
9 matches
Mail list logo