I am trying to find the driving requirement for ITE to be tested to
61000-3-2 and 61000-3-3 (harmonics flicker).
For test measurement equipment 61326 clearly states the requirement, but
I cannot find the equivalent statement in 55022/4 nor can I find it in the
EMC directive.
Anybody help?
Dear Dave
EN 61000-3-2 and -3-3 are both listed
on page 13 of the 30/9/12 edition of the EMCD standards. See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:288:0001:0019:EN:PDF
Best regards
Ian Unwin
From:
Dave Coleman david.cole...@selexelsag.com
To:
In message
of3a5c1ae1.acc2a817-on8025796d.0030b95e-8025796d.00313...@selexelsag.com
, dated Wed, 21 Dec 2011, david.cole...@selexelsag.com writes:
I am trying to find the driving requirement for ITE to be tested to
61000-3-2 and 61000-3-3 (harmonics flicker).
These standards are 'product
That's my point - I'm aware of the requirement to be compliant with these
standards, but I'm giving direction to others less knowledgeable and I
need to refer to them to the text that states the requirement
unambiguously. If these words are not in the product standards or in the
directive,
Dave
You are not required to be compliant with standards – you are required to be
compliant with the protection requirements of the EMC Directive.
Ways of demonstrating compliance are discussed in “The Guide for the EMC
Directive 2004/108/EC (8th February 2010)”, available from
Charlie,
Yours and John Woodgate's responses tell me what I already know - but
don't answer the fundamental question, of why there is not a legally
enforceable document (and the EMC Directive Guide is not), that tells the
uninitiated what standards their equipment needs to comply with, if
In message
of7e5afce7.40bb91cf-on8025796d.0040e621-8025796d.0041c...@selexelsag.com
, dated Wed, 21 Dec 2011, david.cole...@selexelsag.com writes:
Why did the writers of 61326 feel it necessary to include reference to
610003-3-2 3-3, but the writers of 55022 did not?
The writers of IEC/EN
In message
3f0347ac6ed9504191f91f07629fbb0c554...@thhsle14mbx2.hslive.net, dated
Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Charlie Blackham char...@sulisconsultants.com
writes:
In reality most companies choose to test products to Harmonised
Standards, using test equipment made by companies who sit on standards
Dave,
Your main point is true, but consider this :
1) There are many thousands of products on the world market that are sold
within the EU. Each can be slightly different or vastly different from each
other.
2) Even sight differences in application and use could force you to look at
other
Hi Derek!
Thanks for the input / feedback - will look into the alternate way of
demonstrating compliance to the traceability requirements.
Here is the excerpt from TIA 603 D
1.4.5 Standard Atmospheric Conditions
The standard atmospheric condition is a temperature of 25 °C at an atmospheric
There are not that much standards applicable to each and every product,
unless you never read the list. If you do not know which standard
is applicable, one also can opt for the generic standards set.
The phenomena based approach is imho the way if you cannot afford
the use of a consultant.
So
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48914036B@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Wed, 21 Dec 2011, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
So in order of best results:
1. Ask a consultant
What about:
0 Ask on this mailing list
?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try
Isn't the requirement in the scope?
EN 61000-3-2 applies to all electrical and electronic equipment that has an
input current of up to 16A per phase, suitable for connection to the
low-voltage AC public mains distribution network.
It is my understanding that it is the responsibility of the
Professor Leferink published a nice paper that proposed a different correction
factor for a SAC to a FAC. I tried to track it down but had no luck.
Best Regards
Charles Grasso
Compliance Engineer
Echostar Communications
(w) 303-706-5467
(c) 303-204-2974
(t)
Go back, way back, to the paper by pate, german, smith, on the NSA.
Go through all the details and calculations and surmise that there is the
direct path, and the reflected path.
The reflected path adds, or not, to the direct path, depending on wavelength
(phase at receive antenna) and distance
At a basic level, do an NSA for the chamber and compare to the OATS NSA to
develop a correction factor for the two.
From: Grasso, Charles charles.gra...@echostar.com
To: Jim Hulbert jim.hulb...@pb.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
16 matches
Mail list logo
