Return Receipt
Your RE: Limit on AM Broadcast power, USA
document:
Dear Experts,
As per this ERC recommendation relating to the use of SRDs, devices
falling under the Annexure 9 Band F1 category, are 'Not implemented' in
many of the European countries. What does this mean? What if the emission
level is more than 42 dBuA/m at 10m but less than 60 dBuA/m at
All
Is it necessary to show compliance with harmonics and flicker requirements
for products even though the product standard applied specifically omits
this?.
My concern is that EN61326 requires these measurements for Class B equipment
but specifically does not for Class A equipment.
Thanks
Amund -
Assuming your concern is provision of spares or fuse
replacement in the field, so long as your company stays
within the appropriate ratings for the overall device, it
should not be a great concern for your product to be marked
with a fuse replacement marking indicating the fuse type and
F-Squared Laboratories is an independent test lab with facilities in Maryland
and Ohio.
We have an opening for a technical sales person.
A suitable candidate should have experience in selling test laboratory
services and a technical background in either safety and/or EMC testing is of
benefit.
Hi Chris:
I'm in the same boat. HP wants a ridiculous amount of money just to look at my
now-obsolete 8591EM, and they said they'll be charging more in a couple of
months.
Although I'm not familiar with the SSA1000A, the used prices I see on the 'net
for it make me think something in the
.
From: Pat Lawler [mailto:pat_law...@condordc.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Wayne Kerr Spectrum Analyzer
Hi Chris:
I'm in the same boat. HP wants a ridiculous amount of money just to look at
my now-obsolete 8591EM
We have a Wayne Kerr SSA1000A spectrum analyzer that we bought with an “Easy
1” pre-compliance emissions system that is in need of repair. At the
present time, Wayne Kerr is quoting us an exploratory fee just to see if it is
repairable, due to its age and near obsolescence. I thought…Obsolete!
Hi all
What is the EMC requirements for equipment mounted on busses and trucks in
EU. The equipment have nothing to do with the steering or control of the
vehicle.
Best regards,
Kim Boll Jensen
Bolls Rådgivning
Ved Gadekæret 11F
DK-3660 Stenløse
Tlf.: 48 18 35 66
Fax: 48 18 35 30
Mobil: 22
Go on over to the SEHS Grapevine over at the SEMI site, they handle this stuff
on a regular basis.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: John mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk Woodgate
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: Toxic gas detector performance
Amund Westin am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in
aoenigjpfmpdhikjmgcnkeoecgaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'GOST vs.
international EMC standards', on Mon, 31 Oct 2005:
RTTE Labelling QuestionFour GOST standards are listed below. Can any
of these relate to EN55022/CISPR22, EN/IEC61000-4-x
If you have any inputs, you may contact me off-line.
1. Are there any minimum requirement (number of years) within EU for IT /
telecom equipment? does it exist an EU garantee directive?
2. Shall such certificate of warranty be included with the equipment when it
is placed on the EU market?
3.
Julian Jones ju...@hursley-emc.co.uk wrote (in
c8e28fdb460d664aa3ad73d1d53aef19238...@post.hursley-emc.co.uk) about
'EN50366 uncertainties', on Thu, 27 Oct 2005:
hi any one experts on calculating the uncertainties for EN50366 and can
share some knowledge with me ? either via forum or off line
Hello all,
Kurt's suggestion re delimited braces didn't work in my case (I use PINE,
a text-based, non-graphical email reader). However there's an even better
way;
Submit long URLs to www.tinyurl.com and they generate a tiny URL that
takes you to the same page, while eliminating any cut paste
Hi Mr. Paul,
I know Compliance Engineer is good. You can visit their website at
www.ce-mag.com. Besides, Interference Technologies is good too. The website is
www.interferencetechnology.com. Hope you can find what you want.
Regards,
Li Di
GM Compliance, Inc. China Office
web:
Ron Pickard rpick...@hypercom.com wrote (in
of0c2f5fd3.17ffb22d-on072570a0.00793fc7-072570a0.007a5...@hypercom.com)
about 'IEC61000-3-3:2005 query', on Thu, 20 Oct 2005:
The IEC just reported that it has published IEC61000-3-3:2005. Does
anyone know (crystal ball or otherwise) when CENELEC
Hi Sudhakar:
Further to your question, I came across this web page, where the engineer
discusses the issues of using the IEC61000-4-2 to test components:
http://emcesd.com/tt2004/tt060104.htm
Pat
___Sudhakar Wasnik.wrote___
Hello all ESD experts,
Per IEC 6100-4-2 Sec. 7.1.1
All,
There will be a sequential or joint Northeast Product Safety Society and
EMC Society meeting next Wednesday, October 26, at EMC Corporation's
Conference Room 1-2 (Building A, 1st floor) at 228 South Street in
Hopkinton, MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at 6:00
PM and the
-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
pat_law...@condordc.com
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 11:05 AM
To: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: ESD test.
Hi Sudhakar:
I am not an ESD expect, but I had some comments.
Are you sure you have to use IEC61000-4-2? I consider this a system test
Hello all ESD experts,
Per IEC 6100-4-2 Sec. 7.1.1
EUT is isolated from HCP (Horizontal Coupling Plane) by insulating object of
0.5mm thick.
Standard does not define this Insulating object. Based on the different
insulating materials the test results vary. Pass can be fail and fail
-Original Message-
From: Derek Walton [ mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:49 AM
To: sdrysd...@etc-mpb.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Looking for 400 Hz chamber filters.
Hi Scott,
I have four 400Hz 30 amp filters that I'd like to
Hi all,
I am currently looking for 3 phase (WYE), 20 amp, 400 Hz RFI facility type
filters for our chamber(s). We are looking for around 80-100dB insertion
loss. If anyone has any leads or even a used product they would be willing
to part with, I'd be glad to hear from you. I have already
If the composite device can radiate all transmitters simultaneously, I
believe you will find that they will need to be tested simultaneously. The
exposure limit standards indicate the sum of all exposure sources, though I
am not sure that you will find that the measurement methodology for a
Did not see any answers to this question. Were there any?
Is there a list? Too off topic?
- Robert -
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:03:29 -0700
POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com wrote:
All,
The subject has come up about allowable or excluded
revision letters for
equipment or
***
Three (3) RF Test Engineers
Five (5) EMC Test Engineers
Company: SIEMIC Laboratories, Inc.
Location(s): San Jose, California, Shanghai (Suzhou) China, and Beijing China
EMC/RF Compliance testing, trouble-shooting and reporting for international
certifications such as
Bob, et al,
I would refer you to the IEC 60479 series of standards which deal with
the effects of electric shock on the human body.
The committee is composed of a worldwide set of medical doctors and
engineers who are experienced in these matters. They have collected the best
Greetings,
I thought I knew this RTTE labelling stuff cold but clearly I don't :(
Until the recent addition of additional countries to the EU we had clear
requirements for our short range devices at 433.92 MHz
According to the list kept at ero.dk our equipment was Class1 Sub Class 20.
Easy
Given that BSMI, CCC, VCCI and others use essentially the same standards
for measurements, processes, equipment, and that test house are
generally certified in a consistent manner by independent auditors (NIST
authorizes A2LA, and NVLAP here in the US). One might ask themselves;
why some
Dear Sir
You can talk your lab out of the need for a BSMI certified Host PC but
this could be a show stopper if your Taiwan customer EMC engineer
disqualifies your data. You might want to ask what your customer
expects.
Regards
Dan
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf
We have the part available.. A quote will be sent to the person who
originally inquired
Best Regards,
Michael Hopkins
Manager, Customer Technical Center
Control Technology Division
Compliance Test Solutions
Thermo Electron Corporation
One Lowell Research Center
Lowell, MA 01852
Tel: +1
Return Receipt
Your Parts for Keytek CE-40
document:
Return Receipt
Your Parts for Keytek CE-40
document:
Paul Lovell asked
I understand that Part 18 applies to ISM products but what is its current
status (ie active or waived)? Is it just EMC or does it cover other
things?
Please excuse my ignorance, I'm new to the medical field, but I'm told
there
are no FCC emissions requirements for medical
From personal experience, 0.1mA is wa-a-a-ay too high!
Make it more like 10 uA
- Robert -
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:03:19 +0100
gd...@ncht.trent.nhs.uk wrote:
With regard to whether Doug should be measuring Patient
Leakage from his
bedframe:-
I believe the bedframe is an
Dept.
Advanced Energy Industries Inc.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:12 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: IEC 60950-1 2nd Ed
Doug Beckwith dougbeckw...@yahoo.ca wrote (in
2005103312.68191.qm...@web30508.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Doug,
Have you checked out IEC 60601-2-38, Particular Requirements for the Safety
of Electrically Operated Hospital Beds.
This standard may clarify how you measure earth leakage current and patient
leakage current for a hospital bed. (I don't have a copy of this standard,
so I'm guessing).
Doug,
60601-1 is not the easiest standard to interpret, but I think that in this
instance you are interpreting it incorrectly. Patient leakage current is
that current which flows between an Applied Part and Earth via the patient.
The accessible parts of the frame are not considered as Applied
Doug,
Altho I am not completely familiar with 60601-1 since I haven't
worked with it for a number of years, I will comment on leakage current
requirements for earthed equipment in general.
By and large it is recognized that earth/ground is unreliable for
cord connected equipment around
Paul Lovell
Group Compliance Manager
Huntleigh Healthcare
Tel: +44 (0)1582 745891
Hi All,
I understand that Part 18 applies to ISM products but what is its current
status (ie active or waived)? Is it just EMC or does it cover other things?
Please excuse my ignorance, I'm new to the medical
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hi Folks, I have the manual.
My sincere thanks to all who replied,
Cheers,
Derek Walton
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the
Hi Folks,
does anyone have a soft copy of the equipment manual for the HP 3488A
Switch unit?
I can't seem to find my hard copy, and I'd like to get the GP-IB
commands ASAP.
Thanks,
Derek Walton
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.
Neil Barker posted:
You need to select your host PC very carefully to ensure that it is
compliant, and that it is quiet enough for you to be able to tell whether
or
not your device is contributing to the emissions.
One also needs to take care the host selected doesn't suppress an emission
Ken Javor wrote
Between several hundred microfarads of storage capacity and the EMI
filter,
that doesn't seem terribly likely but it can't be completely discounted so
it makes sense as a rationale.
I'm thinking a USB device is not likely to generate signals a LISN would
see. On top of that,
shbe...@rockwellcollins.com wrote (in
OF0CC42EDE.C55A13B6-ON85257093.00530A02-85257093.00536847@rockwellcollin
s.com) about 'harmonic distortion testing', on Fri, 7 Oct 2005:
Please forgive my ignorance of international, commercial regulatory
standards, but I have questions on harmonic
Brian O'Connell boconn...@t-yuden.com wrote (in
d54e6ec1d5a2f544a2c14ee15a1d5ccc01167...@cms.t-yuden.com) about
'harmonic distortion testing', on Fri, 7 Oct 2005:
I have used and enjoyed instruments from Elgar for this purpose (but
not an inexpensive solution).
I wouldn't associate Elgar with
jim.hulb...@pb.com wrote (in
ofbf39eefb.895ac2f0-on85257093.005495d1-85257093.00556...@pb.com)
about 'EN 55022 confusion', on Fri, 7 Oct 2005:
I would appreciate once more a clarification and, if possible, a
rationale for this situation.
Look back in the list's archives for recent articles by
I would suggest that you do need to test at both supply voltages; but more
significantly, your greatest problem is unlikely to be your product but the
host PC. You need to select your host PC very carefully to ensure that it is
compliant, and that it is quiet enough for you to be able to tell
No answer here, I'm just trying to get educated on the premise behind the
original question.
The modification prompting the requirement for conducted emission testing is
the addition a USB device powered from the PC USB host. I assume this
device consumes on the order of 1 Watt of power. The
Gentlemen,
I am wondering if someone knows of any other test standards for
UPS's other than the IEC-62040 series?
Regards to all,
Dave Garnier
David Garnier
e GE Health Care
___
David S. Garnier
Senior Technician
It is my opinion that you must test conducted emissions at
both AC input conditions, and archive those test results.
The mechanisms for conducted emissions can vary greatly
whether you're at 110/60 or 230/50. Better test. A good
Power Supply will minimally exhibit that effect, but who
knows
With the change in CISPR 22, anyone know how testing above 1 GHz is being
addressed in Japan today?
Don Umbdenstock
Manager Compliance Engineering
Tyco Safety Products / Sensormatic
6600 Congress Avenue
Boca Raton, FL 33487 USA
561.912.6440
djumbdenst...@tycoint.com
From: Pettit, Ghery
Richard Jones jones...@cardiff.ac.uk wrote (in
s3424e5c@maincf1p.cf.ac.uk) about 'EMC event Cardiff UK 20th
October', on Tue, 4 Oct 2005:
Here in Cardiff we are holding an EMC seminar on the 20th October. It
is free to attend and the flyer for the event can be downloaded as a
pdf from our
Jeff Chambers j.chamb...@ndirect.co.uk wrote (in
004d01c5c84e$6e14fa40$bae307c3@x8i2i2) about 'Low Voltage Directive',
on Mon, 3 Oct 2005:
Hello, does anyone have to hand any URL's which provide a general
introduction/guide to this topic?
There is a Guidance Document and other material
IEC 60950 clause 1.7.15 says:
IF an equipment is provided with a replaceable battery and IF
replacement by an incorrect type could result in an explosion (e.g. with
some lithium batteries), the following applies:
Since lithium replacements are available for essentially all battery
sizes, that
Hello EMC Guru's,
I am looking for some guidance...
Is there an established Standard Test Method for measuring
AC Power Conducted Emissions above 30 MHz (say to 150 MHz?)
((Obviously, CE limits for CISPR11 only go to 30 Mhz.))
Thanks for your time,
Dave Garnier
David
Dear all,
This is a question aimed at the UK market - although any continental input
appreciated.
We have a customer who wishes to power our product via two 30A Single Phase
spurs, the customer has two Power Distribution Units (PDU's) each with 3 phase
supplies. The customer wishes to provide
Carpentier Kristiaan kristiaan.carpent...@thomson.net wrote (in
1f5308c5923f3b4daa51d189bf255006c23...@edgmsmail01.eu.thmulti.com)
about 'Which EMC Standard apply with IP-STB product', on Wed, 28 Sep
2005:
CISPR22/A2, CISPR24/A2, and similar amendments in CISPR13/20 cover
multi-function
The session details for the 2005 IEEE Product Safety Engineering
Symposium, have been posted at:
http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/symposium/sessions.html
Many of the authors are already widely known for their expertise
in the field of safety. Some are well known colleagues with a
wealth
Having worked on rohs and weee as part of a small team within a
Production Engineering group and in close liason with our Engineering
dept for 3 or more years I would agree with John W that no one person is
up to the task. I would be sceptical of anyone who claims they could.
If you can read and
John Woodgate wrote:
It isn't strictly correct to say that standards are 'under'
Directives, and it can be quite misleading.
That is a very important point and I suspect one which is generally
understood. In particular, it seems to me that meeting the safety
objectives of the LVD is the key
Hi Kim.
This form always comes to us via Fax from the importing agent or Shipping
Company, and I always fill in the form manually and return it by Fax. This
always works, and seems to suit the Customs Officer raising the question in
the first place, i.e. it gives him something to put in the
All,
Note: Speaker change for NPSS meeting.
There will be a sequential or joint Northeast Product Safety Society and
EMC Society meeting next Wednesday, September 28, at EMC Corporation's
Conference Room 1-2 (Building A, 1st floor) at 228 South Street in
Hopkinton, MA. A social hour with light
Return Receipt
Your RE: American Bureau of Shipping approval
document:
Good morning, Jim.
The Code reference you cite is it, as far as interrupting
capacity goes. The NFPA isn't going to stick it's neck out
any further and the shouldn't. The rationale is that each
application could be different, some having 10 kA, some
having or 100 kA or greater fault current
Hans-
As you know, HERO is the testing and rating of compatibility between
electronics (intentional radiators) and ordinance.
As far as I know this testing and rating is done at only one place, by
the
Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Virginia.
For
Are there labs that can certify to HERO specs? prefer
those in Northern CA.
Hans Mellberg
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety
I have recently crossed paths with two new UNIX servers from two different
companies, one had a manual in the box and the other had a document that
said see their website. I had no problem finding the one on the website.
Jim
Jim Bacher
Senior Engineer
Paxar Americas, Inc.
170 Monarch Lane
Wow, only 13 dB. was that broadband, or what freq?
Try the same model with unbalanced drive [one wire is
ground], that *has* to put some signals on a floating
shield.
- Robert -
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:05:06 -0600
drcuthb...@micron.com wrote:
For what it's worth I ran a
drcuthb...@micron.com wrote (in
f72651ec60c2c945878cf1cf6a3e5af4949...@ntxboimbx13.micron.com) about
'cable shield simulation', on Mon, 19 Sep 2005:
For what it's worth I ran a NEC-2 model of a differential
transmission line under these conditions:
Your results are no surprise. But what
Occam Networks in Santa Barbara, CA is looking for a full-time
engineer with experience in mechanical, electrical and compliance
aspects of Outdoor Electronic Cabinets/ Remote Terminals.
This person will help with the design and support of new and existing
cabinet solutions. The job involves
I've seen quite a few good replies to this thread with some fun EM
analysis. I'd like to offer a practical viewpoint (I know, I'm usually
the one that's throwing Math around...so I'll take the other viewpoint
this time)
I have my suspicions that some items are sold as shielded just so that
the
If we grant that an image plane can reduce radiated emissions when placed
adjacent to PCB, it seems it would also follow that an image plane next to a
ribbon cable could perform likewise. However, if that were the intent, it
would seem cheaper and more effective to include the image plane as a
The IEEE's Product Safety Engineering Society is creating a new,
peer-reviewed journal
for original work that advances the theory and practice of product safety
engineering.
Help us launch this much-needed resource for the Product Safety and related
professions!
Abstracts and papers and being
Consultation of stakeholders concerning a possible amendment of the Low
Voltage Directive (LVD) 73/23/EEC addressing the electrical sector
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/el
ctr_equipment/lv/direct/lvdconsult_en.htm
Consultation period ends 30 Sept 2005.
Regards,
Chris
Dear Group,
Further to my earlier email, I did a web search and found that 'groundplane'
ribbon cable does exist (was vaguely aware of it from memory) and that it is
claimed to have better transmission properties. Improved signal integrity
usually means lower emissions. The cable comes with or
The definition or range of the term low frequency was bounded by saying
the cable was electrically short.
And the point is not to stop eddy currents from flowing, but to maximize and
control where they flow. Both of these functions are achieved by using a
high conductivity shield with low
I have a problem with this as well. A non-magnetic shield material protects
against magnetic field radiation by providing a path for eddy currents to
flow in. The eddy currents flow in such a way as to cause a magnetic field
that opposes the originating field (Lenz' law). In order for the eddy
Alan,
Think also in terms of magnetic fields, or area loops.
The area defined by the small loop between signal lines and
ground lines now have rather opaque metal plates over them.
Starting around 10KHz the conductive shield kills all
the magnetic fields coming out. Which were probably more
G'Day!
Came across an oddity today which has failed to stimulate any memories (from
about the time the old King died!) of basic electromagnetic theory. A
well-known computer Company supplies what it calls shielded ribbon cables.
When we examine one of these we find it's essentially a metallic
Hi, Camille.
From: Camille Good
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:07 PM
Actually, I think you are outside of Class 2 limits
with 24 Vac 5 A, as the limits of Class 2 are maximum
30 Vac / 42.4 Vdc
Although you are correct about Reginald's needs exceeding
Class 2 limits for wet locations
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
All,
I would like to know if anyone can help me locate an original version of the
Samsung Power Vaccine specification.
Thank you,
-Doug
All,
I would like to know if anyone can help me locate an
original version of the Samsung
Hi Group,
Any idea on how to solve this issue for China MII for the following scenerio:
Company X is the Manufacturer of the product:
Company X hires a local Rep as their in-country Rep. because they do not have
an office in China.
Company X OEM's the product and sells it to Company Y
For certified equipment the FCC identifier is a unique number
established by the FCC to identify the product and the manufacturer
providing the FCC with traceability of the equipment in case of a
complaint in the field. Prior to the DoC process all (?) class B
equipment would be tested and the
Art 15. it was 200,000 units
Article 15
Implementing measures
1. When an EuP meets the criteria listed under paragraph 2,
it shall be covered by an implementing measure or by a selfregulation
measure in accordance with paragraph 3(b). When
the Commission adopts implementing measures,
Dear Experts,
What is Clearance Certificate for RFID products put in EU market?
What are the standards to be followed for this? Is there any certification
authority / body issuing this? I request you to help me.
Till date, I was thinking that EN301489, 300330 are the appropriate
For a switch-mode power conversion product that is physically quite
small, we are eyeing the following Part 15B easement regarding markings:
(5) When the device is so small or for such use that it is not
practicable to place the
statement specified under paragraph (a) of this section on it, the
Bob Foster
The following countries have regulations in place:
India (safety)
Israel (safety, emc)
Saudi Arabia (safety, emc)
South Africa (safety, emc)
Australia (safety, emc)
Mexico (safety)
Argentina (safety)
Taiwan (safety, emc)
Korea (safety, emc)
China (safety, emc)
Japan (safety, emc)
We are looking for the right person to lead the EMC group, establishing it
as a Center of Excellence within and outside of our business unit. We are
the Sensormatic Business Unit of Tyco Safety Products, located in Boca
Raton, Florida.
Come join a team to apply your broad talent in the EMC
Hi Daniel
suggest you contact John at Fair-rite. I believe they have a plant in China.
Cheers,
Derek.
Daniel Liang wrote on 9/9/2005, 3:03 AM:
Dear all,
I want to buy 500pcs of 0.1x 0.1m ( about 6mm thick) ferrite tile for a special
project, do you know which company has such product
_
From: Daniel Liang [mailto:daniel_liang_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:04 AM
To: PSTC EMC
Subject: Buying ferrite tile.
Dear all,
I want to buy 500pcs of 0.1x 0.1m ( about 6mm thick) ferrite tile for a
special project, do you know which company has such product
Dear all,
I want to buy 500pcs of 0.1x 0.1m ( about 6mm thick) ferrite tile for a
special project, do you know which company has such product for selling,
prefer the product has wider frequency range attenuation(i.e.30MHz - 1GHz or
higher), and it has their sales office in Asia or China.
It may be too late but you should not designate your goods as a
prototype. They are unfinished goods or work in progress. There is a
process for doing this but it may be too late once you have hit customs.
Fred Townsend
Charles Blackham wrote:
Group
I have a client who trying to ship
I think that there is a good definition on the OSHA site concerning what a
factory is. I believe it indicates that the factory is not just where the
label gets put on (an old time classic consideration) but where assembly does
take place. Not just putting modules in and shipping out.
Scott -
Google search provided
Handbook of Antennas for EMC
(Hardcover)
by http://www.booksamillion.com/ncom/
ooks?id=3260199412449type=authorfind=MacNamara,+Thereza+M. Thereza M.
MacNamara
In Stock: Ships within 2-3 days.
Our Price: $151.80
Mr. Barrows makes a good point: get the requirements from the donkey's mouth.
Should have put this URL in my original msg:
http://www.osha-slc.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/nrtlregs.html
which is only says that adequate controls for conducting follow-up
inspections of the
actual production of items to
Dear Anders,
We can offer you our liaison service. Please contact me of-line in case you
like to receive further information.
With Kind Regards,
Henry Rutjes
Telefication
www.telefication.com
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Anders Svensson B (LI/EAB)
Chris,
I was never in any meetings involving the Commission when the WEEE Directive
was being drawn up, so I cannot comment on the accuracy of you assertion below.
It seems more likely to me that - if the Commission even considered distance
selling at all - they took the view that at the
Opps, I mean 3-3.
dave...
From: Garnier, David S (GE Healthcare)
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 12:25 PM
To: 'John Woodgate'
Subject: RE: Changes to EN61000-3-2?
Hi John,
I just received a email from IEC webstore and I see the 3-3 revised 3-3
document plus ones for EKG MRI, opps. This
Garnier, David S (GE Healthcare) david.garn...@med.ge.com wrote (in
0d7ea72cd324b24d85eecde3d4da8f980339b...@mkemlvem04.e2k.ad.ge.com)
about 'Changes to EN61000-3-2?', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
What has happened to the profession equipment classification in these
changes?
No change.
--
Regards,
jgoedd...@tycoint.com wrote (in
AE34E7FDD9D01F42994924D4C4EB6A4F0A013A91@flbocexu05) about 'How many
declarations', on Fri, 2 Sep 2005:
Is it reasonable, acceptable and wise to combine all our declarations
onto one document?
I should think it's OK to put them on one sheet of paper, if you put
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
