<251cd282cc37-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 9:26 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [PSES] IEC/EN62368-1 includes requirements (Annex M) to
IEC/EN 62133-2
Hi Amund
UN38.3 only addresses battery transportation, covering both expected cond
16:39
> Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Emne: Re: [PSES] IEC/EN62368-1 includes requirements (Annex M) to IEC/EN
> 62133-2
>
> Hi Amund,
>
> Annex M (batteries) is normative = shall comply. You only get to comply with
> Annex M if you pass M.2.1 which requires that cel
Amund
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: James Pawson (U3C)
Sendt: 16. oktober 2023 16:39
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Emne: Re: [PSES] IEC/EN62368-1 includes requirements (Annex M) to IEC/EN 62133-2
Hi Amund,
Annex M (batteries) is normative = shall comply. You only get to comply with
From: Amund Westin
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 3:27 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] IEC/EN62368-1 includes requirements (Annex M) to IEC/EN 62133-2
An IT product must comply to EN62368-1. It contains Lithium LiPo batter.
According to EN/IEC62368-1-1:2020, § M.2 Safety of b
An IT product must comply to EN62368-1. It contains Lithium LiPo batter.
According to EN/IEC62368-1-1:2020, § M.2 Safety of batteries and their cells,
the standard IEC 62133-2 is listed, and batteries and cells shall comply
according to that standard.
Could this be interpreted as an invariable r
self.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> Matthew Larkin
> TÜV SÜD Product Service
> Tel: +44 (0) 1489 558212
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 27 April 2016 17:14
> *To:* Scott Al
With best wishes OOO – Own Opinions Only <http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk>
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
J M Woodgate and Associates Rayleigh England
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 5:50 PM
To: 'Scott Xe'
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 6
com]
Sent: 27 April 2016 14:34
To: Leber, Jody (Suwanee); EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG; Larkin, Matthew
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
Hi Matt,
Where did you get dow of 10/01/2016?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Win
IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
Scott & Matt,
Thanks for your information. Should we consider in this way that for product
scope in EN 60065 or 60950-1, the effective date should follow the publication
in OJEU and for batteries, DOW of 10/01/2016 is applied as per standard stated.
Scott & Matt,
Thanks for your information. Should we consider in this way that for
product scope in EN 60065 or 60950-1, the effective date should follow the
publication in OJEU and for batteries, DOW of 10/01/2016 is applied as per
standard stated. Currently EN 62133 is not included in LV
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
>> Windows 10
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Larkin, Matthew [mailto:matthew.lar...@tuv-sud.co.uk]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:54 PM
>> *To:* Leber, Jody (Suwanee); EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
mailto:matthew.lar...@tuv-sud.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:54 PM
> *To:* Leber, Jody (Suwanee); EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> *Subject:* RE: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
>
>
>
> Hi Jody
>
> The dow date is 2016-01-10; so 10th January 2016 for EN62133 for
> co
...@tuv-sud.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 1:54 PM
To: Leber, Jody (Suwanee); EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
Hi Jody
The dow date is 2016-01-10; so 10th January 2016 for EN62133 for conflicting
National standards to be withdrawn.
Best Regards
Matthew
Sent from
:13 PM
To: Leber, Jody (Suwanee)
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
Hi Jody,
It is stated in OJEU under EN 60950-1 A2.
For radio equipment, the voltage limit of LVD is removed in both R&TTED and RED.
Can you point me to where the end product standards and CB Sc
Hi Jody,
It is stated in OJEU under EN 60950-1 A2.
For radio equipment, the voltage limit of LVD is removed in both R&TTED and
RED.
Can you point me to where the end product standards and CB Scheme call up
EN 62133 2013.
Cl 8.3.9 is only applied to France in EU and definitely not a harmon
Performance Laboratory Manager
Direct: 770.570.1838
Main: 770.570.1800
Mobile: 678.469.9835
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:53 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
It said this standard comes in force in July 2016. Which
Hi Charlie,
Thanks for your pointer! EN 62133 is in Annex ZA Normative reference of A2
2013. However I did not find any reference to Annex ZA in cl 4.3.8. Can
you shed some light on how to link them together.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
On 27 April 2016 at 00:07, Charlie Blackham
wrote
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 April 2016 16:53
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EN 62133 2013
It said this standard comes in force in July 2016. Which directive does this
standard fall into it?
With regards to cl 8.3.9 forced internal short circuit in cells
It said this standard comes in force in July 2016. Which directive does
this standard fall into it?
With regards to cl 8.3.9 forced internal short circuit in cells, what is
rationale for this as a country specific test only?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
--
C
847.761.3145 F
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Grace
Lin
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:59 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: EN 62133
Dear Memb
Best regards,
Grace
On 8/26/08, Ted Eckert wrote:
Hello Grace,
I can elaborate a little on Mr. Woodgate's comments. I did two quick checks.
The CB Scheme web site shows no national deviations to IEC 62133. Also, the
DKE web site indicates that DIN EN 62133 is just the German translat
In message
<768ee6ab7d56d54bb5000ec2dd113e71044fc...@de01exm61.ds.mot.com>, dated
Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Leber Jody-G19980 writes:
>In the past, IEC 60950-1 for CB Certification has been accepted by many
>test houses for batteries that claim some relation to ITE equipment.
>More recently, we hav
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf
>>>Of John Woodgate
>>>Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:08 PM
>>>To: Nick Williams; EMC-PSTC
>>>Subject: Re: EN 62133
>>>
>>>In message , dat
In message , dated Tue, 26 Aug
2008, Nick Williams writes:
>At 20:41 +0100 26/8/08, John Woodgate wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>>If yes, which directive is this standard being categorized to?
>>
>>I don't think any Directive other than the General Product Safety
>>Directive is involved, and that Directiv
7;harmonisation' (in the
meaning used by the Commission) and compliance with essential
requirements. In other words, just because a standard is not on the
list doesn't mean you can't use it as a justification for a claim of
compliance with the GPSD.
Back fully on topic, EN
Hello Grace,
I can elaborate a little on Mr. Woodgate's comments. I did two quick checks.
The CB Scheme web site shows no national deviations to IEC 62133. Also, the
DKE web site indicates that DIN EN 62133 is just the German translation of IEC
62133 and indicates no national deviations
In message <2a93eb060808261215y52bc606s5bda0b3ac051d...@mail.gmail.com>,
dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Grace Lin writes:
>Is EN 62133: 2003 identical to IEC 62133: 2002?
No EN is absolutely identical to the IEC standard with the same
reference. For example, where possible the EN no
Dear Members,
Is EN 62133: 2003 identical to IEC 62133: 2002? Is it an EU harmonized
standard? If yes, which directive is this standard being categorized to?
Thank you and look forward to your help.
Best regards,
Grace Lin
28 matches
Mail list logo
