I read in !emc-pstc that Provost, Norm nprov...@foxboro.com wrote (in
dfcf570f99237441bece7e315dc3a71e08af3...@ips-dc81-xch.foxboro.com)
about 'NEW EMC Standards' on Thu, 24 Jul 2003:
Responding to Ian Unwin's question regarding future direction of IEC
61326, the proposal within IEC
I read in !emc-pstc that iun...@servomex.com wrote (in OFF90D5CD0.F2B66
363-on80256d6d.00412...@servomex.co.uk) about 'NEW EMC Standards' on
Thu, 24 Jul 2003:
I am on the point of specifying a new signal generator for in-house
radiated immunity testing. Does anybody out there have a feel
, 2003 8:00 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: NEW EMC Standards
Dear Group
I am on the point of specifying a new signal generator for in-house
radiated immunity testing. Does anybody out there have a feel for where
the
upper test frequency limit is likely to go
Dear Group
I am on the point of specifying a new signal generator for in-house
radiated immunity testing. Does anybody out there have a feel for where the
upper test frequency limit is likely to go for industrial instruments
covered by EN 61326 and similar? Is it likely to remain at 1 GHz, or is
...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Carpentier
Kristiaan
Sent: 23 July 2003 11:03
To: 'Alan E Hutley'; Gordon,Ian; Emc-Pstc Discussion Group
Subject: RE: NEW EMC Standards
Hi group,
For people interested in the RTTE Directive, a new list is published on July
Edegem, Belgium
Tel: +32 3 443 6407 - Fax: +32 3 443 6632
e-mail: kristiaan.carpent...@thomson.net
www.speedtouch.com
From: Alan E Hutley [mailto:nutwoo...@nutwood.eu.com]
Sent: woensdag 23 juli 2003 10:02
To: Gordon,Ian; Emc-Pstc Discussion Group
Subject: Re: NEW EMC Standards
Hi Ian
Try
I read in !emc-pstc that Gordon,Ian ian.gor...@bocedwards.com wrote
(in E1BA0362B28ED211A1E80008C71EA3060206FD03@EXC_EAS01) about 'NEW EMC
Standards' on Wed, 23 Jul 2003:
I had a look at the OJ link you sent to check that I had the latest
versions of the standards I use. However, the document
E Hutley'; Emc-Pstc Discussion Group
Subject: RE: NEW EMC Standards
Alan et al
I had a look at the OJ link you sent to check that I had the latest versions
of the standards I use. However, the document doesn't include the 61000-4-x
EMC immunity standards. Are they listed elsewhere?
Ian Gordon
2003 16:42
To: Emc-Pstc Discussion Group
Subject: NEW EMC Standards
Hi Group
New list of EMC Standards in OJ.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/dat/2003/c_172/c_17220030722en00020015.pdf
Cheers
Alan E Hutley
EMC Compliance journal
www.compliance-club.com
Subject: RE: NEW EMC Standards
Alan et al
I had a look at the OJ link you sent to check that I had the latest
versions
of the standards I use. However, the document doesn't include the
61000-4-x
EMC immunity standards. Are they listed elsewhere?
Ian Gordon
-Original Message-
From
12:47 PM
To: 'CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...';
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Have we lost something? was John Woodgate - RE: New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query
A . . . naiveté! I remember those days . . .
Break it to him/her gently.
John Juhasz
To: Gregg Kervill; 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Have we lost something? was John Woodgate - RE: New
EMC standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query
My opinion only. There was a time when the reputation of a
manufacturer or
business in general was a very
Gremmen - ce-marking and more... cet...@cetest.nl
To: Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com, Gregg Kervill
gkerv...@eu-link.com, 'John Woodgate' j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk,
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Have we lost something? was John Woodgate - RE: New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote
(in 20011101170447.RTSO12020.femail23.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.11.150.27]
) about 'Have we lost something? was John Woodgate - RE: New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query', on Thu, 1 Nov 2001:
My opinion only
I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com wrote
(in D9223EB959A5D511A98F00508B68C20C0226B52E@ORSMSX108) about 'New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query', on Thu, 1 Nov 2001:
I feel that immunity is
a product quality issue and is best left to a manufacturer as a customer
Subject: Have we lost something? was John Woodgate - RE: New EMC standards;
now CISPR24/EN55024 query
Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2001, 9:20 AM
I agree whole heartedly with John's point.And while deliberation may not
always be a bad thing, a lack of immunity in an industrial computer must
always
I read in !emc-pstc that Gregg Kervill gkerv...@eu-link.com wrote (in
002f01c162e8$ca3f3800$7300a8c0@MENHADEN) about 'Have we lost
something? was John Woodgate - RE: New EMC standards; now
CISPR24/EN55024 query', on Thu, 1 Nov 2001:
Is there a need for a recognized EMC or safety credential
-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:28 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query
I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com wrote
(in D9223EB959A5D511A98F00508B68C20C0226B526
I agree whole heartedly with John's point.And while deliberation may not
always be a bad thing, a lack of immunity in an industrial computer must
always be a bad thing, and very possibly a BAD THING!
--
However it is not so much a lack of standards but a lack of will and
commitment to
I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com wrote
(in D9223EB959A5D511A98F00508B68C20C0226B526@ORSMSX108) about 'New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query', on Wed, 31 Oct 2001:
Even then, changes in CISPR
documents occur at glacial speed. This isn't always a bad thing
...@intel.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: New EMC standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query
Hi Ghery,
CISPR 24 / EN 55024:1998 is the ITE specific immunity standard. It applies
to ITE, regardless of the installation location.
So, an ITE would then be designed for all intended environments when testing
when a product is class A or B. To bring them into a discussion about CISPR
22 is irrelevant.
Ghery Pettit
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:00 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC standards; now
I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com wrote
(in D9223EB959A5D511A98F00508B68C20C0226B51B@ORSMSX108) about 'New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query', on Wed, 31 Oct 2001:
CISPR 24 / EN 55024:1998 is the ITE specific immunity standard. It applies
to ITE, regardless
I read in !emc-pstc that Ron Pickard rpick...@hypercom.com wrote (in
of487037df.8731060e-on07256af6.0058b...@hypercom.com) about 'New EMC
standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query', on Wed, 31 Oct 2001:
Is the CISPR/G committee working on such a revision? Or will they?
No, because CISPR/G and CISPR/E
Pickard [mailto:rpick...@hypercom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:10 AM
To: nick.willi...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC standards; now CISPR24/EN55024 query
Hi Nick et al,
Your email on these standards has poked into the recesses and brought out a
question
by: cc:
owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: New EMC
standards
o.ieee.org
Copies of BS EN 61000-6-1, -6-2, -6-3 and -6-4:2001 dropped through
my letter box today.
I am not, and have never claimed to be, an EMC specialist. I can read
and understand much of the new standards but I don't have the level
of familiarity required to quickly understand how they change
27 matches
Mail list logo
