Hi Ron:
You pose a tough question that probably has as many answers
as there are jurisdictions in the USA.
Does anyone know if there are any local, county and/or state jurisdictions
that
go beyond, or are in addition to, those regulations of OSHA and/or the NEC?
Here's the URL for
The discussion on local acceptance should include the following:
1) The NRTL designation is a very limited and specialized program directly
applicable to OSHA requirements. Meeting NRTL means that a given lab meets a
very low level baseline of competence and quality. It is quite incorrect,
/Lex/Lexmark)
bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark
Subject: Query: US safety required for ITE?
To all that are fairly intimate with US safety requirements,
Here are some curiosity questions that have been nagging at me for a while:
Other than what can be found in the National Electric Code
:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark
Subject: RE: Query: US safety required for ITE?
Ron, you can break down the requirements into two areas: the consumer market
and the business market. As you have already noted, OSHA regulations governs
the business market
...@lexmark.com]
Reply To: geor...@lexmark.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 8:41 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Query: US safety required for ITE?
I have never conclusively figured this out either. Based on my
understanding, NRTL acceptance is an option
Hello from San Diego:
Ron Pickard asks:
... what specific requirements are there that positively
and unequivicably require NRTL Listing...
To my knowledge, there are two, independent sets of regulations
that require third-party safety certification:
1) OSHA (safety of electrical
@interlock.lexmark.com
cc: emc-pstc%ieee@interlock.lexmark.com (bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark)
bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark
Subject: Re: Query: US safety required for ITE?
Hello from San Diego:
Ron Pickard asks:
... what specific requirements are there that positively
@LEXMTA
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 15:23:26 -0400
Subject: Re: Query: US safety required for ITE?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Precedence: bulk
To all that are fairly intimate with US safety requirements,
Here are some curiosity questions that have been nagging at me for a while:
Other than what can be found in the National Electric Code (Article 800-4, I
believe), the 1910 OSHA regulations and virtually all municipality electric
not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
--
From: ron_pick...@hypercom.com[SMTP:ron_pick...@hypercom.com]
Reply To: ron_pick...@hypercom.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 1998 7:01 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; t...@world.std.com
Subject: Query: US safety required
To muddy the waters further, Ron, I offer a converse reminder: many
Authorities Having Jurisdiction are still using versions of the NEC the
precede the introduction of 800-4 (and the previous location of the same
idea in the 1990 NEC that eludes me). I've known of some jurisdictions to
use the
_
Subject: RE: Query: US safety required for ITE?
Author: Peter Tarver peter.tarver.ptar...@nt.com at INTERNET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/16/98 11:00 AM
To muddy the waters further, Ron, I offer a converse reminder: many
Authorities Having Jurisdiction
12 matches
Mail list logo
