Separator
_
Subject: Re: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Ken Javor SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com at ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/8/2000 5:31 PM
The point is that RE/CE protect broadcast bands. Making an RE measurement
...@transition.com
To: ieee pstc list emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:35 PM
Subject: RE: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Has anyone seen problems with ethernet and conducted emissions? I have a
home office with 4 PCs networked with ethernet running over UTP and I
...@ieee.org
Subject: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Date: Fri, Sep 8, 2000, 3:51 AM
Ken and Cortland and many others that entered this subject :
First, radiated emissions are best measured with radiated (not conducted)
measurements. There is a correlation between CM currents and RE
...@compuprint.it]
Reply To: Paolo Roncone
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 3:51 AM
To: 'Ken Javor'; 'Cortland Richmond'
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Ken and Cortland and many others that entered this subject :
First, radiated
All,
As Ghery reported before (lost in the recent threads, but copied below), the
closely related issue cf definition creepage is being addressed by CISPR SC G
and is already is CDV stage but not yet FDIS. If it isn't already too late,
this might be the best or only opportunity we'll get for
is our next step to get a formal review?
David
__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Paolo Roncone SMTP:paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it at ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
-
From: Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com
To: michael.sundst...@nokia.com; paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it;
eric.lif...@ni.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
So you are saying that an emission limit
'
Oggetto:Re: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Although I don't work commercial EMC on a regular basis and I do not know
over what frequency range the telecom port CE are controlled (I assume here
150 kHz - 30 MHz), I believe that there is a mistaken premise inherent in
the comments
.
--
From: Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
To: 'eric.lif...@ni.com' eric.lif...@ni.com
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Date: Thu, Sep 7, 2000, 9:45 AM
Hi Eric,
I 100% agree with you. The scope of emissions standard should
anything else would be covered by immunity
standards.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:01 AM
To: Paolo Roncone; ieee pstc list
Subject: Re: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Paolo Roncone wrote
.
--
From: Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
To: 'eric.lif...@ni.com' eric.lif...@ni.com
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Date: Thu, Sep 7, 2000, 9:45 AM
Hi Eric,
I 100% agree with you. The scope of emissions standard should
...@compuprint.it
Subj: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
From: Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
Subject: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:45:03 +0200
Reply
Hi Eric,
I 100% agree with you. The scope of emissions standard should be to protect the
outside (i.e. public) environment from interference. So only ports that
connect to public telecom networks should be covered by the standard. The
problem is (as pointed out in one of the previous notes)
13 matches
Mail list logo