RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-09 Thread Pettit, Ghery
, 2000 8:37 AM To: Gary McInturff; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Reference CISPR 22:1997, Clause 3.5 telecommunication ports Ports which are intended to be connected to telecommunication networks (e.g. public switched

Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-08 Thread Douglas C. Smith
Hi All, I could not resist adding my two cents worth. In the last several years I spent at Bell Labs in NJ (moved to CA 4 1/2 years ago), part of my funding came from a group that was responsible for UTP (Cat 5) and associated hardware. On immunity performance, we were not able to find a

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-07 Thread Gert Gremmen
[SMTP:eric.lif...@ni.com] Inviato: mercoledì 6 settembre 2000 17.55 A:emc-p...@ieee.org Oggetto: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports All, As a not-quite-outside-observer (strictly EN 55011 here) of this thread, it's not fun seeing LAN ports classified as telecom; IMO that's

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-07 Thread eric . lifsey
Emissions on Telecom Ports Hi all, just thought I'd throw a few Euros in... First, until folks in the computer world know what shielded cable means ( anything less that 40 dB is lossy insulation;-))) ), I'd stear clear of specifying them. This is 20 years of experience talking, and shields

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-07 Thread Gary McInturff
.3com.com; c...@prodigy.net; cet...@cetest.nl Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org; gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com; john_mo...@eur.3com.com Sent: 9/7/00 6:09 AM Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Hello Group, North America has likely the largest installed base of Ethernet, Fast

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-07 Thread Lfresearch
Hi all, just thought I'd throw a few Euros in... First, until folks in the computer world know what shielded cable means ( anything less that 40 dB is lossy insulation;-))) ), I'd stear clear of specifying them. This is 20 years of experience talking, and shields seem to cause more problems

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-07 Thread David_Sterner
the installation you must use STP everywhere. Therefore invoke the STP loophole. David Sterner ADEMCO Syosset NY __ Reply Separator _ Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Author: Gert Gremmen SMTP:cet

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-06 Thread Gert Gremmen
: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:40 AM To: Pryor McGinnis Cc: david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org; gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com; John Moore Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Pryor, Unfortunately, I don't think the definition is in question. It specifically states

Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-06 Thread Chris Allen
cc:(Chris Allen/GB/3Com) Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports I do not disagree with the positions posted on this subject. My question is how does the EU interpret and enforce this requirement/definition. Pryor - Original Message - From: david_ster...@ademco.com

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-05 Thread David_Sterner
. David __ Reply Separator _ Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Author: Mowbray; John H SMTP:jm134...@exchange.canada.ncr.com at ADEMCONET List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date:9/5/2000 12:06 PM Gary If you

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-05 Thread David_Sterner
__ Reply Separator _ Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Author: Gary McInturff SMTP:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com at ADEMCONET List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date:9/5/2000 10:54 AM

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-05 Thread Mowbray, John H
'; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Define telecom port. A LAN port isn't neccessarily a LAN port. Ethernet ports do not connect directly to the Telecommunications network

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-05 Thread Gary McInturff
- From: Pryor McGinnis [mailto:c...@prodigy.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:37 AM To: Gary McInturff; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Reference CISPR 22:1997, Clause 3.5 telecommunication ports Ports which

Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-05 Thread Pryor McGinnis
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Confusing isn't? - Original Message - From: Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com To: david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org; c...@prodigy.net Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:40 PM Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports

2000-09-05 Thread Gary McInturff
: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Confusing isn't? - Original Message - From: Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com To: david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org; c...@prodigy.net Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:40 PM Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports Actually, it's