Ravinder,
Indeed, the IBM ESD furniture-type ESD simulator should be long remembered!
The purpose of this kind of test is equipment a customer will WANT to buy.
If we are wise, we go _beyond_ what the law requires, so we will gain the
trust of our customers. Often, management views tests such as
05:44:33 AM
Please respond to "Lacey,Scott"
To: Chris Dupres
cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org (bcc: Ravinder Ajmani/San Jose/IBM)
Subject: RE: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Chris
Not to beat a dead horse, but:
While your observations on the political side are very i
Message-
> From: Chris Dupres [SMTP:chris_dup...@compuserve.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 1999 6:29 PM
> To: Lacey,Scott
> Cc: emc-pstc
> Subject: RE: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
>
> Hi Scott.
>
> You wrote:
> < It's sometimes a
Hi Scott.
You wrote:
< It's sometimes all too easy to forget WHY we perform these tests. While
we are trying to comply with written requirements in order to "pass", we
are also trying to ensure product
performance in the real world,>
Time for my favourite hobby horse again...
Going back even furt
<$0.02>
I just thought I'd add my two cents worth. It's sometimes all too easy to
forget WHY we perform these tests. While we are trying to comply with
written requirements in order to "pass", we are also trying to ensure
product
performance in the real world, which can be a very hostile place fro
.
Dave George
Unisys
-Original Message-
From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:12 PM
To: rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Folks,
I posed the question
Dave,
I see here that we hold a different opinion... My opinion is that when I buy
something I expect it to work. Perhaps with us all using windows this
expectation has slipped a little ( come on LINUX! ). As a consumer, immunity
testing is not a quality issue, it is a must.
I don't hold true to
From: lfresea...@aol.com
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 13:11:30 EST
To: rehel...@mmm.com, n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Folks,
>
> I posed the question of Immunity standa
that type of equipment.
--
From: lfresea...@aol.com [SMTP:lfresea...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 1999 1:12 PM
To: rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements propose
rehel...@mmm.com; n...@conformance.co.uk
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
Folks,
I posed the question of Immunity standards being enforced in the USA
to Art
Whal(?) of the FCC. He did not see the
Folks,
I posed the question of Immunity standards being enforced in the USA to Art
Whal(?) of the FCC. He did not see the need for immunity enforcement. After a
lengthy discussion I formed the opinion that it is most likely the FCC will
never press this issue, it will have to come from another STD
To: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US
cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: New EMC requirements proposed for IEC60335
I am working from the EN implementation of the published standard
(BSEN60335-1:1995, including amendments 8913 (oct 95) 9475 (may 97) and
10168 (jan 99
I am working from the EN implementation of the published standard
(BSEN60335-1:1995, including amendments 8913 (oct 95) 9475 (may 97) and
10168 (jan 99). According to anex NA, which lists the differences between
the BS document and the IEC original, CISPR 11 and CISPR 14 were
mentioned in the int
Nick, the IEC has immunity provisions for household
equipmentit is CISPR 14-2. Does IEC 60335-1 reference this
standard at all?
Bob Heller
===
===
Nick Williams on 02/28/99 06:36:10 AM
Pleas
14 matches
Mail list logo
