From: Payne, Glyn
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 4:48 AM
To: ri...@ieee.org; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Richard,
Thanks for this.
The reason we tend to use a metal enclosure where possible is for ruggedisation
and to
of 62368-1.
Best regards,
Glyn
From: Richard Nute
Reply-To:
Date: Wednesday, 22 May 2019 at 19:25
To: "'Payne, Glyn'" ,
Subject: RE: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Hi Glyn:
You have the option of testing the bulkhead connectors in place
certification report says
“minimum.”
Good luck, and best regards,
Rich
From: Payne, Glyn <0d283c0acebb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 5:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
HI Lori,
Your interpre
HI Lori,
Your interpretation is the same as mine, though I haven’t found an IEC
component standard that specifies the flammability rating of optical bulkhead
connectors. There may not actually be one given that they carry no electrical
power.
The one I currently use is HB rated but I do
<0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Reply-To: Pete Perkins
Date: Saturday, 18 May 2019 at 05:27
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
And if these connectors, such as a power socket, meet the component
requirements they are acceptable – whether or n
k...@ieee.org
Entropy ain’t what it used to be
From: Nyffenegger, Dave
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 11:33 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
Bulkhead connectors protrude through fire enclosure openings both sides all the
time.
Bulkhead connectors protrude through fire enclosure openings both sides all the
time.
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 2:24 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
I would agree with you if it said
khead connectors protrude through fire enclosure openings both
sides all the time.
*From:*John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
*Sent:* Friday, May 17, 2019 2:24 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] 62368-1 Openings in a fire enclosure
I would agree with you if it said 'Mat
I would agree with you if it said 'Material that fills an opening...',
but it says 'Material for components that fill an opening...', which is
just differently bad. It appears to apply only if there are more than
one component in the opening, but all consist of only one material. In
that case,
Hmm. Interesting English usage statement.
If something fills an opening, the opening no longer exists. So, how do you
know how to apply the requirement?
Rich
From: Payne, Glyn <0d283c0acebb-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 6:40 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSE
Hi Glyn,
If I am understanding the sited clause correctly, the V-1 class material is
needed for any material/component that fills an opening in the enclosure.
Which means it is acting as part of the enclosure and therefor is required to
meet the V-1 material OR the other requirements listed.
6.4
I would not agree with the test house. If their interpretation was mean,
the wording would be different.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
The UK is a sovereign state, not a Zollverein state
On 2019-05-17 14:40, Payne,
12 matches
Mail list logo
