RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-12 Thread Price, Ed
-Original Message- From: plaw...@west.net [mailto:plaw...@west.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:33 AM To: EMC-PSTC Subject: Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Are you saying that the results of a 'tuning' style measurement sequence are different than a 'stepping' style

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-12 Thread Patrick Lawler
...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Hello Gary and all, The point is do an experiment with your Stepping receiver. Ken -Original Message- From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:36 AM To: 'HALL,KEN (HP

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-10 Thread Price, Ed
Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Hello Gary and all, The point is do an experiment with your Stepping receiver. Ken -Original Message- From: Pettit, Ghery [mailto:ghery.pet...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:36 AM To: 'HALL

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-10 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)'; 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Ken: Did you do your test by first setting the receiver to the 2950 MHz signal, and then setting up a symmetrical scan from that reference? For example, if I used a spectrum analyzer

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread Ken Javor
the measurement error. -- From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2001, 4:15 PM I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in 20011206195802.LCFL6698.femail7.sdc1

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Price, Ed ed.pr...@cubic.com wrote (in b78135310217d511907c0090273f5190d0b...@curly.ds.cubic.com) about 'Stepping receiver, step sizes.', on Fri, 7 Dec 2001: BTW, my 8571A system uses an 8566B SA, and that analyzer actually uses an analog swept oscillator. But under

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread Price, Ed
: HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:ken_h...@hp.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:09 AM To: 'John Woodgate'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Hello all, We typically measure in 500 MHz spans, our spectrum analyzer has 400 bits so 1.25 MHz/bit. Concerned

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Ken, A spectrum analyzer sweeps through a range of frequencies. The resolution of the display merely impacts the accuracy of the frequency determination for a signal when digitized and sent to a computer over the bus. Each point on the display simply shows

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread Pettit, Ghery
Subject: RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Hello all, We typically measure in 500 MHz spans, our spectrum analyzer has 400 bits so 1.25 MHz/bit. Concerned that we could miss an emission I perfromed the below experiment, try it: Injected a 2950 MHz signal into EMI Receiver, set for 1MHz RBW

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-07 Thread HALL,KEN (HP-Roseville,ex1)
...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes. I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in 20011206195802.LCFL6698.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.11.150.27]) about 'Stepping receiver, step sizes.', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001: Keeping the step size to one-half the measurement

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com wrote (in 20011206195802.LCFL6698.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.11.150.27]) about 'Stepping receiver, step sizes.', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001: Keeping the step size to one-half the measurement bandwidth is an accepted way of assuring

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread Scott . Mee
Thank you all for those that replied to my question. I found your suggestions to be exactly what I was looking for! The emc-pstc, and all who belong continue to be a great resource in the EMC world! Regards, Scott Mee EMC Engineer Johnson Controls Inc. PH: 616.394.2565 EMAIL:

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread Ken Javor
: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2001, 7:17 AM Hello Group! I would like to ask a question regarding EMI Receiver step sizes in the higher frequency range. We are performing radiated emissions testing in a semi-anechoic chamber using an EMI receiver. We plan to cover

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread reheller
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc: (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US) 12/06/2001 Subject: Stepping receiver, step sizes

RE: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread Pettit, Ghery
Message- From: scott@jci.com [mailto:scott@jci.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:17 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Stepping receiver, step sizes. Hello Group! I would like to ask a question regarding EMI Receiver step sizes in the higher frequency range. We

Re: Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that scott@jci.com wrote (in of6a8306f3.72fc70aa-on85256b1a.00475...@na.jci.com) about 'Stepping receiver, step sizes.', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001: We are performing radiated emissions testing in a semi-anechoic chamber using an EMI receiver. We plan to cover a high frequency

Stepping receiver, step sizes.

2001-12-06 Thread Scott . Mee
Hello Group! I would like to ask a question regarding EMI Receiver step sizes in the higher frequency range. We are performing radiated emissions testing in a semi-anechoic chamber using an EMI receiver. We plan to cover a high frequency range between 1 and 5 GHz (a large spanse to cover!).