: Chris Maxwell [SMTP:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: 07 January 2002 16:20
To: Crabb, John; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Thermocouple alternative?
Hi John,
A possible solution would be to use an infrared non-contact thermometer.
They measure temperature essentially
: Re: Thermocouple alternative?
Hi John,
A possible solution would be to use an infrared non-contact thermometer.
They measure temperature essentially by pointing them at the object of
interest. They have a few drawbacks that I know of:
1. You need to have visual access to the part
12:32
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Thermocouple alternative?
John,
In my company, I often run into this problem and a non-contact or infrared
thermometer is not always pratical. Like you, I also had to resort to
momentary turn off to get accurate readings. In one instance, I
-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Crabb, John; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Thermocouple alternative?
John,
We use T-type thermocouples which are not as ferrous as J and K types
John,
In my company, I often run into this problem and a non-contact or infrared
thermometer is not always pratical. Like you, I also had to resort to
momentary turn off to get accurate readings. In one instance, I had magentic
fields strong enough to cause damage to the instrument. There
Hi John,
A possible solution would be to use an infrared non-contact thermometer.
They measure temperature essentially by pointing them at the object of
interest. They have a few drawbacks that I know of:
1. You need to have visual access to the part or surface of interest.
2. You need to
6 matches
Mail list logo
