Organic Engines wrote:
> Paul_c,
>
> Is a Troll.
>
> Go home Paul_c.
>
> You're taking up bandwidth and wasting peoples time.
Well, there is a lot of history there. Paul Corner is the
developer of the BDI, which was the first way for non Linux
gurus to install EMC and get it running in
John Kasunich wrote:
> Kenneth Lerman wrote:
>
>>A simple solution is to use a dual drive.
>>
>>Use a course mechanism with long travel for course positioning and a
>>fine mechanism with limited travel for fine positioning. The fine
>>mechanism has a large mechanical advantage and can use a smal
Paul C. is a really realy really smart guy. You would do well to listen to
what he says.
ohHi Paul.
Ha Ha!
Leslie M.Watts
L M Watts Technology
Tiger Georgia
(706) 212-0242
Main page:
http://www.lmwatts.com
Engineering:
http://www.lmwatts.com/shop.html
Cnc surplus for sale:
http://www.lmwatt
On Friday 23 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> 1) He was instrumental in getting EMC to where it is today.
Perhaps, but then there are other people that deserve credit. Stallman,
Torvalds, Mantegazza, Yodakin, not forgetting Proctor, Shackleford, Kramer,
and countless others (oh, and Bill
Gentlemen,
I like Alex Joni's idea. This forum should be for the discussion of
"EMC2" USER interest. The discussion of the finer points of coding
should be relegated to a forum concerning the finer points of coding,
ad nauseam.
Why should time and energy be spent hashing and rehashing old
juv
I think he's tolerated for two reasons:
1) He was instrumental in getting EMC to where it is today.
2) Even through all the trolling, there are some grains of useful
information. (kind of like the idea that legends have some basis in fact)
It would be nice if he'd start contributing (again) ins
Paul_c,
Is a Troll.
Go home Paul_c.
You're taking up bandwidth and wasting peoples time.
Dan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:30 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> > Chris Morley for classicladder.
>
> Patches for CL are sent to Marc Le Douarain where they benefit a wider
> audience.
As you will remember, we (You and I) forked the ClassicLadder project
into the BDI so that we could begin making the changes
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:30 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> Only 24 out of 64 Sourceforge registered names.
I'd have thought you'd have registered your dismay by putting a ! at the
end of that sentence.
You and I know that many of those names were included in the sourceforge
developer list because they w
On Friday 23 May 2008, Alex Joni wrote:
> If you care about development or development related issues use the
> emc-developers mailing list.
I have seen some of these guys, even in the same room, huddled over a
keyboard or engaged in some trivial discussion whilst a guest speaker is
giving a pr
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:30:59PM +0100, paul_c wrote:
>
> As if anything that has gone before has gone through a review process or
> comments & suggestions acted on. i.e.:
Well, there is a democratic process that gives the users the power to
decide who gets to determine the direction of the EM
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 14:39:09 -0500
> From: Ray Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Harmonic gear and EMC2.
>
>
> Good thinking Ken. T
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:40 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
> > I don't have ordinary traceroute installed but there is a "Network
> > Tools" under the System -> Administration that lets me run quite a
> > number of these sorts of tools.
>
> Switching to a console
Please keep this list for discussing the usage of EMC/emc2 (and general
machining topics from time to time).
If you care about development or development related issues use the
emc-developers mailing list.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:30 +0100, paul_c wrote:
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
> I don't have ordinary traceroute installed but there is a "Network
> Tools" under the System -> Administration that lets me run quite a
> number of these sorts of tools.
Switching to a console and running diagnostics from a command line is much
easier.
Good thinking Ken. Till built a dual drive sort of thing several years
ago to test some special kinematics.
http://www.audiflitzer.de/mixer.html
HTH
Rayh
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 14:57 -0400, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> A simple solution is to use a dual drive.
>
> Use a course mechanism with lon
paul_c wrote:
(snip most of the rant)
>> You also have the option of providing your public SSH key to Chris, so
>> you can get developer access yourself.
>
> If anonymous access doesn't work, please explain how sending a "key" will fix
> it.
You seem to be the only one who is unable to connect
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> I don't have the full list at the moment, and it's unnecessary.
You mean to say you have no idea who has access - As a supposed project admin
& "board member", that is a very sad state of affairs... But thanks to Chris,
we now know. Only 24
Kenneth Lerman wrote:
> A simple solution is to use a dual drive.
>
> Use a course mechanism with long travel for course positioning and a
> fine mechanism with limited travel for fine positioning. The fine
> mechanism has a large mechanical advantage and can use a smaller motor
> and driver. O
A simple solution is to use a dual drive.
Use a course mechanism with long travel for course positioning and a
fine mechanism with limited travel for fine positioning. The fine
mechanism has a large mechanical advantage and can use a smaller motor
and driver. Of course, some sort of clutch mech
travel at feed 0.001 will be geometry of 1 inch end mill, with length of
end mill 4 inch. 0.001 /min it is cutting feed only. rapid to new position
will be much faster.
> It is my understanding that in a grinding machine:
>
> 1 -- Cutting forces are low.
>
> 2 -- Backlash is generally not importa
OT - but look at the specs on this one.
http://www.physikinstrumente.com/en/products/prdetail.php?sortnr=700800
Also it the velocity range 0.001/min - 0.00025/min or really 0.001/m
- 0.0025/min?
Dave
On May 23, 2008, at 5:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> all grinders have linear incoder an
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:30:20AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My ongoing troubles with using the ax5214h driver with an Acess DIO-48 card
> may be of assistance to some others.
Dave,
I owe you an apology. I told you that the fix for this problem would be
in emc 2.2, but then I never commi
It is my understanding that in a grinding machine:
1 -- Cutting forces are low.
2 -- Backlash is generally not important.
3 -- Smoothness of motion is very important.
I would suggest that before you worry about how to drive the components
in slow motion, you should tell us how you plan to driv
I think you should consider building a simple test slide, with guides, ball
screw, servo, and a simple timing belt and pulley reduction.
That way you can try different reduction ratios and encoder resolutions and
measure the speeds you can get and how smooth the motion is.
I think you will find
look design of harmonic derive. it is compact and small. you do not want
to have huge gear reduction box on the machines. space are limited too.
> Is there some reason why simple worm and wheel drives won't work here -
> even two or three stages with backlash adjusted out?
>
> Ian
> --
all grinders have linear incoder and all feed back comes to computer not
from revolution of ball screw but from actual move of the table. in that
case the accuracy of ball screw can not make table move faster or slover.
grinder usually program with 0.001-0.003 per minute when grind ceramics.
> Ara
Is there some reason why simple worm and wheel drives won't work here -
even two or three stages with backlash adjusted out?
Ian
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield UK
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsof
28 matches
Mail list logo
