hi
i want to build deposition head for regular cnc mill to transfer mill into
reprap .
to make cnc mill faster in rep rap deposition, head will have 2 axis.
if cnc mill has 3 axis xyz and deposition head will have 2 more axis A and B
so whole machine - reprap unit total axis 5.
on my machine i use
Interesting Mr Wallace, could you post some example files for us that
are slow on the uptake please :)
On 2014-02-26 02:40, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 03:15 AM, Russell Brown wrote:
>> I've been playing around with camview and a little 10mm endoscope type
>> USB camera to see if I could
On 2/25/2014 7:21 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 2/25/2014 8:16 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure it would depend upon how Xylotex or others are implementing
>> their cape..
>>
>> BTW, I'm curious; Does anyone know who came up with the term "cape" ??
>> That seems totally non-obvious to me,
On 2/25/2014 7:16 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>
> I'm sure it would depend upon how Xylotex or others are implementing
> their cape..
>
> BTW, I'm curious; Does anyone know who came up with the term "cape" ??
> That seems totally non-obvious to me, compared to "add-on board",
> "daughter board", etc.
> Di
Hello guys.
I'm having a silly problem with a machine that's not mine but from another
person that sometimes require us to do certain jobs.
The thing is, the machine had a regular HDD that died a few days ago and it
was running Linux 8.04 with LCNC 2.4 now we installed 10.04 with 2.5.0 with
a sol
Hi,
http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=commit;h=39db4d1f16be2a3715d95c72eec8fa180bc91233
regards,
Michael
W dniu 26.02.2014 00:22, Jeff pisze:
> Hi Peter,
>
>Not being a LinuxCNC developer, I know little about "branches" etc. I
> went to git.linuxcnc.org where I figured stuff
On 11/07/2013 03:15 AM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> I've been playing around with camview and a little 10mm endoscope type
> USB camera to see if I could rig such a thing up as an edge finder
> permanently mounted my mill's head.
If you are having trouble finding camview, I have had some success usin
Hi Peter,
Not being a LinuxCNC developer, I know little about "branches" etc. I went
to git.linuxcnc.org where I figured stuff might be, but couldn't find anything
related to hm2_7i90. Right now, I'm basically using the software provided with
the MachineKit, and it doesn't seem to have 7i90
http://psha.org.ru/git/ is the only site I've found the camview stuff on.. but,
not sure where the halio is..
I found a halio.c file here..
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Adding_Digital_Zoom_To_Camview-Emc
No instructions on how to compile it..
On 02/25/2014 05:07 PM, Gene Heskett w
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:41:58 -0500, you wrote:
>Even the cheapest smart drive ( I don't consider Gecko servo drives to
>be smart ) I have used has jerk limiting built in which will take the
>edges off those accel spikes/accel violations.
>But that can also cause motion deviations away from the
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 16:58:44 Billy Huddleston did opine:
> I've been looking ALL over for this plugin.. Did you find it Richard ?
>
> On 11/14/2013 02:04 PM, kqt4a...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Where can I find halio plugin?
> >
> > Richard
I have it on one or both of my machines. ATM IIRC
I've been looking ALL over for this plugin.. Did you find it Richard ?
On 11/14/2013 02:04 PM, kqt4a...@gmail.com wrote:
> Where can I find halio plugin?
>
> Richard
>
> --
> DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Service
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:14:35 -0800 (PST)
> From: Peter C. Wallace
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] beaglebone fpga with linuxcnc
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:45:20 -0700
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] beaglebone fpga with linuxcnc
>
> On 2/25/14 12:29 , Pe
On 2/25/14 12:29 , Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> I forgot one detail: for EPP interfaced hostmot2 on preconfigured FPGA cards
> you want to use the hm2-7i90 branch. Im hoping the features in hm2_7i90
> can be merged with the hm2_7i43 driver so there is a common hm2_epp driver
> for all EPP interfaced H
Hi,
Thanks, I'll look in to the 7i90 branch and see what I can do with that.
I'm pretty (very) new at both LinuxCNC internals and VHDL, so a base to start
from is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff
While I do have a flash SPI on the FPGA board, I haven't populated it (or
tested it), a
> It would be pretty awesome to read the DRO data from LinuxCNC... :)
That would be pretty trivial w/ mesa boards (or any other hardware w/
encoder inputs.)
SMD
--
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco cer
I forgot one detail: for EPP interfaced hostmot2 on preconfigured FPGA cards
you want to use the hm2-7i90 branch. Im hoping the features in hm2_7i90
can be merged with the hm2_7i43 driver so there is a common hm2_epp driver
for all EPP interfaced HostMot2 cards.
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
(\
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Jeff wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:37:38 -0800
From: Jeff
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] beaglebone fpga with linuxcnc
Hi,
Some info about the FPGA boards on my site: At this point,
Hi,
Some info about the FPGA boards on my site: At this point, the FPGA boards I
have listed don't have any released software support to go with them. I'm
going to work on making a library for simple I/O. This version of the board
uses the same BBB I/O pins that Charles's MachineKit uses for
It would be pretty awesome to read the DRO data from LinuxCNC... :)
2014-02-25 15:27 GMT+01:00 Mark Wendt :
> Yeah, I thought it was a pretty slick little idea.
>
> Mark
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Cole
> wrote:
>
> > Very cool!
> >
> > Android and the pocket computers/phones/tabl
I read somewhere that it came from Wonder Dog who wore a cape and was a
beagle.
>Len
On 2/25/2014 11:44 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 02/25/2014 11:25 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>> I guess that... almost makes sense to me.. ;-)
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On 2/25/2014 11:05 AM, Ron Ginger wrote:
>>> The Arduino h
On 02/25/2014 11:25 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
> I guess that... almost makes sense to me.. ;-)
>
> Dave
>
> On 2/25/2014 11:05 AM, Ron Ginger wrote:
>> The Arduino has shields as the add-om board, so I guess a cape was sort
>> of the other side of the shield.
>>
>>
The name comes from the shape of the
I guess that... almost makes sense to me.. ;-)
Dave
On 2/25/2014 11:05 AM, Ron Ginger wrote:
> The Arduino has shields as the add-om board, so I guess a cape was sort
> of the other side of the shield.
>
> ron ginger
>
>
> On 2/25/2014 9:19 AM, emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>> D
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, andy pugh wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:47:18 +
> From: andy pugh
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Fun with trajectory planners and Halscope
>
> On 25 February 2014 11:08, Al
The Arduino has shields as the add-om board, so I guess a cape was sort
of the other side of the shield.
ron ginger
On 2/25/2014 9:19 AM, emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Dave Cole
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] beaglebone fpga with linuxcnc
> To:emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Me
Video clearly shows 2 different computers.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
> I think (and Sam can probably confirm) that he was using
> two separate computers in both cases.
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Steve Stallings wrote:
> > Also wonder if there is any conce
I think (and Sam can probably confirm) that he was using
two separate computers in both cases.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Steve Stallings wrote:
> Also wonder if there is any concern if the
> LinuxCNC looking at LinuxCNC is taking
> synchronized readings thus avoiding one source
> of jitte
Also wonder if there is any concern if the
LinuxCNC looking at LinuxCNC is taking
synchronized readings thus avoiding one source
of jitter, while LinuxCNC looking at Mach3 is
two different computers with independent timing.
Steve Stallings
> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:b
On 2/25/2014 9:21 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> apparently can't just call it a daughter-card or add-on-module because
> the target audience is creative types who need to be shielded (pun
> intended) from such harsh real-world concepts.:)
And we wonder why people get confused when they overhea
I have the logi-bone on order as well. that is what made me think of how I
could use it for linuxcnc as well of other projects of course.
I don't write vhdl for a living so all that is still slightly foreign but
fascinating to me.
keep us in the loop on your efforts with the logi-bone as well as t
On 2/25/2014 7:45 AM, Josiah Morgan wrote:
> I noticed that xylotex has an fpga cape in the works for beaglebone black.
> (as well as other similar items from other sources)
> I was curious if anyone was looking into the implementation of such fpga
> capes into a linuxcnc build.
> also, what would
Yeah, I thought it was a pretty slick little idea.
Mark
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
> Very cool!
>
> Android and the pocket computers/phones/tablets etc have such great
> potential
>
> Thanks for sharing that.
>
> Dave - So many ideas ... so little time.
>
>
> On 2/2
On 2/25/2014 8:16 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>
> I'm sure it would depend upon how Xylotex or others are implementing
> their cape..
>
> BTW, I'm curious; Does anyone know who came up with the term "cape" ??
> That seems totally non-obvious to me, compared to "add-on board",
> "daughter board", etc
Very cool!
Android and the pocket computers/phones/tablets etc have such great
potential
Thanks for sharing that.
Dave - So many ideas ... so little time.
On 2/25/2014 8:53 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
> A pretty neat project with an Android:
>
> http://www.yuriystoys.com/p/android-dro.html
>
I'm sure it would depend upon how Xylotex or others are implementing
their cape..
BTW, I'm curious; Does anyone know who came up with the term "cape" ??
That seems totally non-obvious to me, compared to "add-on board",
"daughter board", etc.
Did that arrive out of a language translation? Or
A pretty neat project with an Android:
http://www.yuriystoys.com/p/android-dro.html
Mark
--
Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco certified tool.
Monitor traffic, SLAs, QoS, Medianet, WAAS etc. with NetFl
I noticed that xylotex has an fpga cape in the works for beaglebone black.
(as well as other similar items from other sources)
I was curious if anyone was looking into the implementation of such fpga
capes into a linuxcnc build.
also, what would be the benefits and drawbacks to the addition of thi
On Tuesday 25 February 2014 08:41:05 Viesturs Lācis did opine:
> 2014-02-25 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Alexander Stewart :
> > Steve;
> >
> > Despite what those figures appear to show, Mach's output behaves
> > better
> >
> > > than LinuxCNC's. It sounds much much smoother. I posted many moons
> > > a
Ha ha.. I saw you and Rob raising hell on the Mach3 email list.. ;-)
That was a very interesting exchange, and Art jumped in, which was nice.
The results are VERY interesting.
The accel violations; Mach3 has always bent the rules a bit and gotten
away with a lot of stuff simply because steppe
Granted - I might have some issue somewhere I am not thinking of.. But..
A few manual calculations of the velocity plot from the mesa encoders
seem to confirm the calculations..
sam
On 2/25/2014 5:47 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 11:08, Alex Joni wrote:
>> Since it's hardware co
The velocity is coming right from the mesa. I am calculating the
acceleration over a longer time frame (aprox 36ms iirc) because if I
calculate it every ms - it is pretty much noise... (because of thread
jitter and 'stuff')
With linuxcnc testing - It compares pretty closely to its internal ha
On 25 February 2014 11:08, Alex Joni wrote:
> Since it's hardware counters on the 7i80, you can trust them pretty much.
Are we absolutely sure that the velocity/accel is being calculated
from a stable clock unaffected by any ethernet comms latency or
servo-thread jitter?
--
atp
If you can't fix
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Alex Joni wrote:
>
> > Sam,
> >
> > How are you getting LinuxCNC to monitor and log Mach's processes?
> >
>
> Sam explained that in his first email:
>
> There's a second LinuxCNC machine with a 7i80 attached
> (http://www.mesanet.com/pdf/parallel/7i80dbman.pdf) -
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:27 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I am testing a 7i80. The hardware encoder counters will read step/dir.
> I am using the position and velocity output for plotting and calculating
> acceleration. (so - I just have one linuxcnc setup as if I had
> 'step/dir' encoders hooked u
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Wendt"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Fun with trajectory planners and Halscope
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 PM, sam sokolik
> wrote:
>
>> I am surprised people still put u
I am testing a 7i80. The hardware encoder counters will read step/dir.
I am using the position and velocity output for plotting and calculating
acceleration. (so - I just have one linuxcnc setup as if I had
'step/dir' encoders hooked up to it.)
sam
On 02/25/2014 04:16 AM, Mark Wendt wrote
I did not think linuxcnc had an issue. Maybe rose colored glasses..
;) Part of the issue is you thought the current TP behaviour was a
'bug' while it just was performing as designed. The 1 segment look
ahead doesn't work as well as you get into higher speeds/shorter
segments. My eyes where
2014-02-24 22:50 GMT+02:00 andy pugh :
> found these earlier today answering a forum thread:
> http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/321302774338
>
Thank you very much for the link! I tried searching in ebay before posting,
but just like always - correct keywords are crucial for any meaningful
results...
V
2014-02-25 12:47 GMT+02:00 John Alexander Stewart :
> Steve;
>
> Despite what those figures appear to show, Mach's output behaves better
> > than LinuxCNC's. It sounds much much smoother. I posted many moons ago
> >
>
> Does the TP work change that? Probably makes the old comparison invalid.
It
Steve;
Despite what those figures appear to show, Mach's output behaves better
> than LinuxCNC's. It sounds much much smoother. I posted many moons ago
>
Does the TP work change that? Probably makes the old comparison invalid.
> Well done Rob for taking this on and shame to those who buried the
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:03 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I am surprised people still put up with me... I do have a lot of help
> from the community. The compact 5 configs using the latch and dual
> stepgens would not have been possible if not for Jeff and Chris's
> smarts.. (I am the big picture
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 23:09:15 -0600, you wrote:
>On 02/24/2014 10:03 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
>> I am surprised people still put up with me... I do have a lot of help
>> from the community. The compact 5 configs using the latch and dual
>> stepgens would not have been possible if not for Jeff and C
53 matches
Mail list logo
