Am 04.02.2012 um 00:30 schrieb Frank Tkalcevic:
>> I haven't considered a generic VFD or Modbus device driver, because not
>> only do the device functions vary widely, but so do implementations of the
>> Modbus standard.
>
> Yes, I found that too.
Amen. I had that grandiose plan too, despite
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 14:58 -0800, Karl Cunningham wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 12:20 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> > I have some more thoughts on VFD components. My plan for my SJ200
> > component was to have a bare-bones version that let one operate speed,
> > direction and maybe a fault signal, then a mor
> I haven't considered a generic VFD or Modbus device driver, because not
> only do the device functions vary widely, but so do implementations of the
> Modbus standard.
Yes, I found that too. I built my code based on the GS2 module and
Michael's code.
> Early on, I avoided using the GS2 comp
On 02/03/2012 12:20 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I have some more thoughts on VFD components. My plan for my SJ200
> component was to have a bare-bones version that let one operate speed,
> direction and maybe a fault signal, then a more complete version with
> more features, but still only those nece
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 11:38 -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 19:50 -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> > I'm trying to get my SJ200 VFD connected with Modbus. In preparation for
> > this I ported a MVX9000 which I had on the shelf. It turned out to be a
> > slam dunk, almost.
> > http:/
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 19:50 -0800, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I'm trying to get my SJ200 VFD connected with Modbus. In preparation for
> this I ported a MVX9000 which I had on the shelf. It turned out to be a
> slam dunk, almost.
> http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/EMC2/mvx9000/
I've noticed
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 19:13 +1100, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
> I've taken the existing gs2_vfd.c from src/hal/user_comps and made an
> sj200_vfd.c
>
> I don't like writing code that isn't modular and reusable, so I started to
> write the module so it could be configured by a table of values. I only
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 11:36 +0100, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Am 03.02.2012 um 04:50 schrieb Kirk Wallace:
>
> > I am able to modpoll the proper registers now, but I have a problem
> with
>
> Do you mean 'modpoll the proper registers' to mean 'read several
> holding registers in one operation'?
>
Am 03.02.2012 um 04:50 schrieb Kirk Wallace:
> I am able to modpoll the proper registers now, but I have a problem with
Do you mean 'modpoll the proper registers' to mean 'read several holding
registers in one operation'?
If so: I had that problem with the Toshiba VFS-11. See the note in my dr
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:12 +1100, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
> So which version do you need? I've made my own revision 2 driver.
I have rev. 2, or rather SJ200subscript2. If your component is GPL'd
then I'd appreciate getting a copy, although my problem seems to be with
libmodbus. I'm planning on g
So which version do you need? I've made my own revision 2 driver.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Wallace [mailto:kwall...@wallacecompany.com]
> Sent: Friday, 3 February 2012 2:51 PM
> To: LinuxCNC Users List
> Subject: [Emc-users] SJ200 VFD and Modbus
>
>
I'm trying to get my SJ200 VFD connected with Modbus. In preparation for
this I ported a MVX9000 which I had on the shelf. It turned out to be a
slam dunk, almost.
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/EMC2/mvx9000/
The SJ200 is a different story. It turns out Hitachi made a rev. 1 and 2
of
12 matches
Mail list logo
