Hi,
I did a fresh BDI, put 'noacpi' in the GRUB line and installed the
rtai_smi.ko
crash!
Any advice?
Dan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http
Hi.
When you say "BDI", do you mean the BDI disc with EMC1, or do you mean
the EMC2/Ubuntu LiveCD?
- Steve
Organic Engines wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I did a fresh BDI, put 'noacpi' in the GRUB line and installed the
>rtai_smi.ko
>
> crash!
>
> Any advice?
>
> Dan
>
---
Hi,
Ubuntu Live CD. Is that not the BDI?
I already tried upgrading Ubuntu 7.10 to heron and running the install
EMC script. That crashed. :(
Well I am trying the new Heron live CD. We will see what that does.
Dan
---
Hi Dan
I'll try to make this history lesson as short and painless as
possible.
The BDI evolved out of an early discussion that we came to call a
Brain Dead Install when the EMC was still a part of NIST. It's
difficult to imagine now how much trouble it was to get a running
version of the EMC
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 08:53 -0500, Ray Henry wrote:
> I've still got a bunch of blank CDs that are printed with the BDI image
> produced for us by Rab Gordon and printed at my expense. I don't use
> them for public distribution any more but I still like the looks of that
> disk.
I did some work f
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:04 -0400, Matt Shaver wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 08:53 -0500, Ray Henry wrote:
> > I've still got a bunch of blank CDs that are printed with the BDI image
> > produced for us by Rab Gordon and printed at my expense. I don't use
> > them for public distribution any more
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:04 -0400, Matt Shaver wrote:
> I did some work for the company that (IIRC) printed those CDs, and their
> in-house artist said that it was one of the best, most artistic, CD
> labels he'd seen, and they're in the CD printing business!
For the curious youngsters among us.
)"
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:04 -0400, Matt Shaver wrote:
>
>> I did some work for the company that (IIRC) printed those CDs, and their
>> in-house artist said that it was one of the best, mos
Message -
> From: "Ray Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing
>
>
>> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:04 -0400, M
Message -
> From: "Ray Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing
>
>
> > On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:04
ce so far (couple years).
Regards,
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "John Thornton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing
> Alex,
>
> What did you use
nal Message -
> From: "John Thornton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:16
> PM Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Still Crashing
>
>
> > Alex,
> >
> > What did you use to print
To add to the history lesson...
On Saturday 17 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
> The BDI evolved out of an early discussion that we came to call a
> Brain Dead Install when the EMC was still a part of NIST. It's
> difficult to imagine now how much trouble it was to get a running
> version of the EMC
paul_c wrote:
> To add to the history lesson...
>
(snip)
>
> I no longer have access to the repository
> (not even anonymous)
EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
Regards,
John Kasunich
-
This
John Kasunich wrote:
> paul_c wrote:
>> To add to the history lesson...
>>
> (snip)
>> I no longer have access to the repository
>> (not even anonymous)
>
> EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
> http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
>
And for a checkout (oops, forgot this one):
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:03:35AM +0100, paul_c wrote:
> I no longer have access to the repository
> (not even anonymous),
http://cvs.linuxcnc.org
> and JMK decided a long while ago that I wouldn't be
> contributing any further...
This is incorrect. You decided for yourself on Apr 05 2006
At 10:20 PM 5/20/2008, you wrote:
>On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:03:35AM +0100, paul_c wrote:
>
> > I no longer have access to the repository
> > (not even anonymous),
>
>http://cvs.linuxcnc.org
>
> > and JMK decided a long while ago that I wouldn't be
> > contributing any further...
>
>This is incorr
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
> EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
> http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
`ping http://cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Fail
`traceroute cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Stops somewhere in the alltel.net system.
`cvs -z5 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co emc2` - Connection times out
paul_c wrote:
>On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>
>
>>EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
>>http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
>>
>>
>
>`ping http://cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Fail
>
>
Removing the "http://"; from that makes it work, on both Linux and
Windows systems. It doesn't work on
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> paul_c wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>>
>>
>>> EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
>>> http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
>>>
>>>
>> `ping http://cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Fail
>>
>>
> Removing the "http://"; from that makes it work, on both L
Thank you for bringing this problem to my attention. I have just altered a
local firewall rule so that traceroute can complete a trace to
cvs.linuxcnc.org. Here is what the traceroute now looks like from the most
geographically separated system I could access:
$ traceroute -f15 cvs.linuxcnc.org
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
> Pinging it _with_ the http is NOT going to work. You ping hosts, not
> services. "http://"; is a URL, not a hostname. Paul has been around
> long enough to be well aware of that.
> Pinging _with_ the http:// is doomed to fail, which I'm sure Paul
paul_c wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
>> Pinging it _with_ the http is NOT going to work. You ping hosts, not
>> services. "http://"; is a URL, not a hostname. Paul has been around
>> long enough to be well aware of that.
>
>> Pinging _with_ the http:// is doomed to fai
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 20:10 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
> > EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
> > http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
>
> `ping http://cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Fail
You are quite right that the above comand will fail. Try
cvs.linuxcnc.org without t
At 03:10 PM 5/21/2008, you wrote:
>On Wednesday 21 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
> > EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
> > http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
>
>`ping http://cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Fail
>`traceroute cvs.linuxcnc.org` - Stops somewhere in the alltel.net system.
>`cvs -z5 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROT
Paul:
Coincidently, two nights ago I tried just what you tried, in my case
downloading the complete Release-2.2.5 from cvs.linuxcnc.org. I used a
newly installed Linux and I have had no previous interaction with the
cvs system ever, so there shouldn't have been any detritis left over to
confus
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> email them to a developer for review and possible inclusion.
Please provide a full list of "developers" who have access to the repository.
---
Paul.
-
This SF.ne
paul_c wrote:
>On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
>
>
>> email them to a developer for review and possible inclusion.
>>
>>
>
>Please provide a full list of "developers" who have access to the repository.
>
>
I don't have the full list at the moment, and it's unnecessa
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> I don't have the full list at the moment, and it's unnecessary.
You mean to say you have no idea who has access - As a supposed project admin
& "board member", that is a very sad state of affairs... But thanks to Chris,
we now know. Only 24
paul_c wrote:
(snip most of the rant)
>> You also have the option of providing your public SSH key to Chris, so
>> you can get developer access yourself.
>
> If anonymous access doesn't work, please explain how sending a "key" will fix
> it.
You seem to be the only one who is unable to connect
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
> I don't have ordinary traceroute installed but there is a "Network
> Tools" under the System -> Administration that lets me run quite a
> number of these sorts of tools.
Switching to a console and running diagnostics from a command line is much
easier.
Please keep this list for discussing the usage of EMC/emc2 (and general
machining topics from time to time).
If you care about development or development related issues use the
emc-developers mailing list.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:30 +0100, paul_c wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:40 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
> > I don't have ordinary traceroute installed but there is a "Network
> > Tools" under the System -> Administration that lets me run quite a
> > number of these sorts of tools.
>
> Switching to a console
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:30:59PM +0100, paul_c wrote:
>
> As if anything that has gone before has gone through a review process or
> comments & suggestions acted on. i.e.:
Well, there is a democratic process that gives the users the power to
decide who gets to determine the direction of the EM
On Friday 23 May 2008, Alex Joni wrote:
> If you care about development or development related issues use the
> emc-developers mailing list.
I have seen some of these guys, even in the same room, huddled over a
keyboard or engaged in some trivial discussion whilst a guest speaker is
giving a pr
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:30 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> Only 24 out of 64 Sourceforge registered names.
I'd have thought you'd have registered your dismay by putting a ! at the
end of that sentence.
You and I know that many of those names were included in the sourceforge
developer list because they w
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:30 +0100, paul_c wrote:
> > Chris Morley for classicladder.
>
> Patches for CL are sent to Marc Le Douarain where they benefit a wider
> audience.
As you will remember, we (You and I) forked the ClassicLadder project
into the BDI so that we could begin making the changes
On Friday 23 May 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
> You seem to be the only one who is unable to connect to the server for
> anonymous read-only access. Of course no key is required for that.
Using a remote server that I have a shell account on...
-bash-3.00$ ssh-keygen -t dsa
Generating public/privat
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:12:42PM +0100, paul_c wrote:
>
> Using a remote server that I have a shell account on...
> ssh: connect to host cvs.linuxcnc.org port 22: Connection refused
Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine?
When you try again let me know the date and time and IP. I will
-Alex Joni wrote- " Please keep this list for discussing the usage of
EMC/emc2 (and general machining topics from time to time). If you care about
development or development related issues use the emc-developers mailing
list."
I second that - and with the other comments popping up the motion is
I've had a tcpdump running on 206.222.212.218 (bald.unpythonic.net) which
captured Paul's traceroute packets in and ICMP Unreachable replies back out.
These are the packets that traceroute expects to be generated when its trace
actually reaches the destination machine.
So the packets are reaching
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
> > Using a remote server that I have a shell account on...
> > ssh: connect to host cvs.linuxcnc.org port 22: Connection refused
>
> Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine?
Yes, and I can also run cvs to do anon checkouts from other systems. Log
On Sunday 25 May 2008, paul_c wrote:
> The external IP address should be in the 84.9.xx.xx block, but I'm not on a
> static IP, so it will change.
Update, 87.74.xx.xx today - Might be something else after lunch.
-
This SF.net
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:18:21AM +0100, paul_c wrote:
> On Saturday 24 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
> > > Using a remote server that I have a shell account on...
> > > ssh: connect to host cvs.linuxcnc.org port 22: Connection refused
> >
> > Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine?
>
> Ye
You just have to love it. Who writes this material?
C: You're smart enough.
P: No I'm not.
C: But you're sharp as a tack.
P: Nope, stupid as a rock.
C: You're just being difficult.
P: No I'm not. Besides, this project sucks. Only an idiot would want to
work on it.
Of course, the above is pure
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
> > > Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine?
> > Yes
> No you can't. Sourceforge disallows it. You must not have actually
> tried.
Oh shucks - Must have been another machine I was logged in to yesterday. With
ten or more consoles open at any on
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 03:22:05PM +0100, paul_c wrote:
> On Sunday 25 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
> > > > Can you ssh to anywhere else from this machine?
> > > Yes
> > No you can't. ?Sourceforge disallows it. ?You must not have actually
> > tried.
>
> Oh shucks - Must have been another machine I
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Chris Radek wrote:
> Yes, congratulations, you found a network that blocks ssh, one of the
> most commonly used protocols on the internet. If you try, you can
> find one that blocks all web access on port 80 too.
*cough* Corporate networks *cough* secure systems *cough*. An
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 10:06:04PM +0100, paul_c wrote:
> Anyways, I now have a box set up in the lab, negotiated access to the outside
> world, and can at least pull "stuff" from cvs.linuxcnc.org... Why the ***
> pserver can't be used for anon access, I don't suppose we will get an answer.
> B
Gentlemen,
I like Alex Joni's idea. This forum should be for the discussion of
"EMC2" USER interest. The discussion of the finer points of coding
should be relegated to a forum concerning the finer points of coding,
ad nauseam.
Why should time and energy be spent hashing and rehashing old
juv
50 matches
Mail list logo
