On 10/26/2012 12:19 PM, dave wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 11:36 -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote:
blah blah blah
On the plus side, I expect someday to see someone successfully exploit
the GPU to offload some of our CNC calculations from the CPU. The
horsepower is there; it's a matter of timing.
Hmmm -
On 2012-10-26, at 12:44 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
On 10/26/2012 12:19 PM, dave wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 11:36 -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote:
Most of the present day GPU's wouldn't even strain handling motion the
problem is simply that processors (GPU) are a moving target and
On 10/26/2012 02:47 PM, John Stewart wrote:
OpenCL on Linux is ok. At least it was last time I tried it. I started a blog
on some stuff I did OpenCL wise:
http://gpucomputes.blogspot.com
(It was set up not as a technical treatise, but for students) (oh, and I ran
the code on OSX for the
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, cogoman wrote:
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 19:21:01 -0400
From: cogoman cogo...@optimum.net
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Using
On 27 October 2012 00:34, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
AFAIK (and I am no expert) the lookahead limitation is not compute bound
but rather structural based on a early design decision
Indeed not. On modern hardware most paths can probably be fully
computed before the end of the
