yea iv'e just seen gedit mucking with the files , i wondered where it was
coming from
iv'e started using KATE instead ,, it's also usefull for xml editing too
On 19 September 2014 22:22, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Hi have made a wee bit of progress with the spindle controls on the
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Erik Christiansen dva...@internode.on.net
wrote:
On 19.09.14 17:22, Gene Heskett wrote:
Has anyone else had a similar problem with gedit? Its a PIMA when it
happens, to have to do all that edit, restart lcnc to get the next
error's
line number so you
On Saturday 20 September 2014 00:50:35 Jon Elson did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 09/19/2014 10:58 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
It has been run, for a day a half, dead clean but not exactly
recently. If geany ever does it, yup on the memtest86 session,
instantly. So far, geany has not had any
On 19 Sep 2014, at 22:22, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
s5000 = 1407
s1300 = 1366
s1200 = 1267
s1100 = 1164
and it follows a reasonable straight line down to
s100 = 112
s50 = 60
s30 = 40
Are you sure that the pod is working? You should get the number you ask for.
On 09/20/2014 05:12 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
... snip
Can't help diagnose gedit, can only say that in nigh on a quarter
century's use of vi/vim, I've never lost (or doubled up on) a byte
through unreliability. There is though, some extra use of undo while
getting used to it, as with most
On Saturday 20 September 2014 10:57:12 Andy Pugh did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 19 Sep 2014, at 22:22, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
s5000 = 1407
s1300 = 1366
s1200 = 1267
s1100 = 1164
and it follows a reasonable straight line down to
s100 = 112
s50 = 60
s30
Hi have made a wee bit of progress with the spindle controls on the lathe,
but lower speed performance is still sorely lacking.
Current pid.s settings
Pgain 125
Igain .05
FF0 100
FF120
maxoutput is set 1% below the pwmgen scale to keep it from hitting 100%
duty cycle. Since this is a
On 09/19/2014 04:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hi have made a wee bit of progress with the spindle controls on the lathe,
but lower speed performance is still sorely lacking.
Current pid.s settings
Pgain 125
Igain .05
FF0 100
FF120
maxoutput is set 1% below the pwmgen scale to keep it
On 19.09.14 17:22, Gene Heskett wrote:
Has anyone else had a similar problem with gedit? Its a PIMA when it
happens, to have to do all that edit, restart lcnc to get the next error's
line number so you can re-edit and fix it till it will actually run again.
It can be 20+ minutes to fix it
On Friday 19 September 2014 22:37:16 Jon Elson did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 09/19/2014 04:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hi have made a wee bit of progress with the spindle controls on the
lathe, but lower speed performance is still sorely lacking.
Current pid.s settings
Pgain 125
On Friday 19 September 2014 23:14:12 Erik Christiansen did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 19.09.14 17:22, Gene Heskett wrote:
Has anyone else had a similar problem with gedit? Its a PIMA when it
happens, to have to do all that edit, restart lcnc to get the next
error's line number so you can
On 09/19/2014 10:58 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
It has been run, for a day a half, dead clean but not exactly recently.
If geany ever does it, yup on the memtest86 session, instantly. So far,
geany has not had any such hiccups.
I use emacs, which I believe is what is actually running
behind
12 matches
Mail list logo
