n the settings, and it worked perfectly- so the obvious answer is
to use Claws mail - certainly for anything encrypted, so that is what I
will do. Thanks for the help, anyway.
Regards,
Bob
On 22/11/2016 4:46 pm, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 22.11.16 14:09, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I didn&#x
On 22/11/2016 11:40 am, Mike Acker wrote:
> > > On 11/22/2016 06:00 AM, enigmail-users-requ...@enigmail.net wrote:
>> LMDE is not production ready (and neither are the other editions >>
of Linux Mint), even if it looks pretty. > > > I disagree with these
remarks. I'm using LMDE/2 (Betsy) today -
Having used it before with no problems, I am getting an error using
Enigmail/GnuPG2 on Thunderbird running under a new install of Linux Mint
Debian Edition. All appears welluntil I come to send a message and I get
the error message:-
"GnuPG reports an error in the communication with gpg-agent (a c
On 01/06/2016 6:32 pm, Hakuch wrote:
> are there any possibilities to create rules for public key attaching?
> Currently, I send always my public key to everyone, even if I sent it
> already 2000 times to a specific person.
Why not just put your key number in your signature and let them get it
fro
On 07/04/2016 2:37 am, B00ze/Empire wrote:
> Good day.
>
> So I've switched to using my Zoho email account for testing with Adele.
> Now, I have a older version 1.6 of Enigmail, but I saw that the newer
> versions use PGP/MIME by default, so I decided to try it out with Adele
> (I can pick PGP/MIM
On 27/07/2015 10:48 pm, Hauke Westemeier wrote:
>
> I also would like to have a sorting possibility of the key signatures.
> I have some keys in my keyring who have several hundred signatures. By
> sorting by user-id it would be possible to get a faster overview who
> of my known keys also signed
On 21/03/2015 10:36 am, Olav Seyfarth wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
>> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG
>> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is a good
>> idea to get rid of the problem -- or this just postponing the problem?
>
> Please don'
On 21/03/2015 9:57 am, Olav Seyfarth wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
>
>
> Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had private
> keys, but all is now well. Thanks again,
>
>
> So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now removed.
> I'd like to restore them, but how to ged rid
On 20/03/2015 10:01 pm, Olav Seyfarth wrote:
installed GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4
>>> reason is, that GnuPG 2.0.27 errors out if it detects keys using MD5.
>>> Workaround: use allow-weak-digest-algos in Enigmail or gpg.conf
>> Is there a method to search for such keys?
>
> I definitely
On 18/03/2015 12:57 pm, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> On 18.03.15 12:11, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla.
>> I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all -
>> getting the following error message:-
>
I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. I
couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - getting the
following error message:-
error
The spinner was indicating that it was trying to load the keys, but
nothing happenedafter a considerable wait.
I reinstalled
On 06/02/2015 7:35 am, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 05.02.15 21:02, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 2/4/15 11:01 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>>> The question is not so much the effort - you won't get a figure
>>> from me. The main concern is code complexity, which makes things
>>> hard to read, unders
On 05/02/2015 10:52 am, Werner Koch wrote:
> If there is a problem with Kleopatra you may instead use GPA - just do
> not install Kleopatra, use a registry setting, or delete the Kleopatra
> binary. Except for some minor things GPA provide the same functionally
> (called the UI-Server) and in add
On 05/02/2015 6:55 am, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 04.02.15 20:16, Bob Henson wrote:
>> On 04/02/2015 5:13 pm, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>>> We recently discussed in (a part of) the Enigmail team that we should
>>> think about giving up support for GnuPG 1.4.x.
>
On 05/02/2015 6:55 am, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 04.02.15 20:16, Bob Henson wrote:
>> On 04/02/2015 5:13 pm, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>>> We recently discussed in (a part of) the Enigmail team that we should
>>> think about giving up support for GnuPG 1.4.x.
>
On 04/02/2015 8:15 pm, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/4/15 11:16 AM, Bob Henson wrote:
>> On 04/02/2015 5:13 pm, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>>> We recently discussed in (a part of) the Enigmail team that we should
>>> think about giving up support for GnuPG 1.4.x.
>>>
On 04/02/2015 7:27 pm, Samir Nassar wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 07:16:26 PM Bob Henson wrote:
> > Hmm - just tried the GPG4Win installer - it won't allow the installation
> > of GnuPG without Kleopatra too and Kleopatra is very, very flaky under
> > Windows
On 04/02/2015 7:27 pm, Samir Nassar wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 07:16:26 PM Bob Henson wrote:
>
> Hmm - just tried the GPG4Win installer - it won't allow the installation
> of GnuPG without Kleopatra too and Kleopatra is very, very flaky under
> Windows 64
On 04/02/2015 5:13 pm, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> We recently discussed in (a part of) the Enigmail team that we should
> think about giving up support for GnuPG 1.4.x.
>
>
Hmm - just tried the GPG4Win installer - it won't allow the installation
of GnuPG without Kleopatra too and Kleopatra is ve
On 04/02/2015 5:13 pm, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> We recently discussed in (a part of) the Enigmail team that we should
> think about giving up support for GnuPG 1.4.x.
>
There may be a few problems with Windows users only being able to get
GnuPG 2.x as part of GPG4Win - that might put many peop
On 19/12/2014 3:27 pm, terrygal...@mailbolt.com wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014, at 07:23 AM, Bob Henson wrote:
>> Enable it, and then don't use it. Simples! Tchk!
>
> Or, remove the broken software. Simpler! Tchk!
>
>
My apologies to everyone else reading -
On 19/12/2014 3:08 pm, terrygal...@mailbolt.com wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014, at 06:54 AM, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I don't recall the conversation - but it sounds to me as though the
>> OP has not set his Thunderbird account to use Enigmail.
>>
>> Tools
On 19/12/2014 10:13 am, Roland Siemons wrote:
> Terry,
>
> I have the same problem. I remember the issue was debated some time
> ago, e.g. by bob.hen...@galen.org.uk (topic: "Odd behaviour of
> Enigmail 1.7.2"). I did not see an answer.
>
> Perhaps anyone knows which settig should be adapted in T
On 06/11/2014 4:55 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Thanks. I imagine that will also apply to the Windows port too.
>
>
>
> At present, we do not recommend using GnuPG 2.1 with Enigmail. There
> are a couple of problems with it which we believe will seriously impact
> many users' experiences.
>
On 06/11/2014 2:52 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2014 06:11 AM, Bob Henson wrote:
>
> I hear this morning that there is a new GnuPG 2.1.0 version which is
> quite different from the 2.0.x versions. Will Enigmail continue to work
> with this new version?
>
I hear this morning that there is a new GnuPG 2.1.0 version which is
quite different from the 2.0.x versions. Will Enigmail continue to work
with this new version?
Regards,
Bob
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
enigmail-users
On 05/10/2014 12:36 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 05.10.14 10:54, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I must say that the new Enigmail is much more unnecessarily
>> complicated to set up and to use than the old one - and I cannot
>> see the reason for the changes. I'm sure
On 04/10/2014 7:46 PM, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> On 25.09.14 17:38, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I've just started using Thunderbird/Enigmail again and am seeing an od
> d
>> thing. I have Enigmail set to neither sign nor encrypt mail unless I
>> manu
I've just started using Thunderbird/Enigmail again and am seeing an odd
thing. I have Enigmail set to neither sign nor encrypt mail unless I
manually tell it to. When replying to a newsgroup messageor e-mail, the
Enigmail Key Selection window pops up. This is apparently random - but
may be time rel
29 matches
Mail list logo
