On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:26:53 -0800 "Robert G. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> [snip]
> >>Also, Could someone include the patch so e.16 builds with freetype 2
On Monday, 17 March 2003, at 15:26:53 (-0800),
Robert G. Werner wrote:
> Actually, I think it still builds against freetype 1, as you
> indicated but it is able to handle the include files the way RH lays
> them out (is it RH that does this or the FT2 lib?). E.16.5 can't
> find the right include
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
[snip]
Also, Could someone include the patch so e.16 builds with freetype 2
(as it installs on RH 7.*)?
there is such a patch? :) its in cvs i believe to build.. but it bui
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> BAM wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Could someone test this with an old autoconf and see if it breaks? More
> > distros have switched to the latest autoconf since th
BAM wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
[snip]
Could someone test this with an old autoconf and see if it breaks? More
distros have switched to the latest autoconf since this was last
discussed, so a lot of people will need something like this.
[snip
Also, Could someone in
On 17 Mar 2003 16:52:25 +0100 Cristalle Azundris Sabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think that was just about everybody's plan, really, with the sole
> > > reason for it not having been implemented yet being that we've neve
At 09:07 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still, and have been for a long time, looking for a good file
> manager. My definition of "good" being primarily a user-friendly
> one.
I'd be most interested to hear your definition of u
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 18:53, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> if it goes ok - lets apply to cvs and maybe roll out a release?
e16 cvs doesn't work with autoconf 2.5x (autoheader fails). This patch
is just enough to make it compile.
Could someone test this with an old autoconf and see if it breaks? More
At 01:31 PM 3/17/2003 -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen evidence mentioned before and that it's related to
> Enlightenment somehow. What's the official deal with that ?? As I
> recall, evi
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen evidence mentioned before and that it's related to
> Enlightenment somehow. What's the official deal with that ?? As I
> recall, evidence's website doesn't even mention E, or if it do
On Mon 17 Mar 2003, BAM wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:56:23 +0100, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > My primary focus has been on making things work (for me) on RH-8.0
> > > with a Gnome desktop. I have tried not to break
On Mon 17 Mar 2003, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2003 10:27:18 +0100 Cristalle Azundris Sabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > my eventual plans are to have the desktop background managed by a
> > > separate process to e
At 10:21 AM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
GnuMdk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting for
> it. Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always
> use gtk+-1.2 instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E1
On 17 Mar 2003 10:27:18 +0100 Cristalle Azundris Sabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > my eventual plans are to have the desktop background managed by a
> > separate process to e - evidence would be one, or any other you want
> > to p
Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
my eventual plans are to have the desktop background managed by a
separate process to e - evidence would be one, or any other you want
to put there that works with e.
I think that was just about everyb
15 matches
Mail list logo
