On Wednesday, 14 February 2007, at 18:31:21 (-0500),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> in other words, they're both wrong ... you're just choosing the one
> that "seems to work" :P
I'll take the one that works over the one that doesn't any day.
There are non-fatal errors/warnings from auto* that we've bee
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:31:21 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > if it works for
> > devs - then it's good. if it doesn't work for users because they updated
> > their autofoo packages... TOO BAD. autofoo is for developers.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:45:11 +0100 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Michael Jennings wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 14 February 2007, at 01:18:46 (+0100),
> > Kim Woelders wrote:
> >
> >> I still don't quite get all the opposition against autopoint (except
> >> the stupid requirement that th
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> if it works for
> devs - then it's good. if it doesn't work for users because they updated
> their autofoo packages... TOO BAD. autofoo is for developers. using cvs
> basically gives you the
> responsibility of a developer when it comes to ru
and i thought you were just trying to force me to keep your module :)
Thanks,
Zach
On 2/14/07, Christopher Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> > Unloading, Disabling, all results in a segfault with the new Net
> > module. BT Follows
>
> This was a bug in edje that reph
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> Unloading, Disabling, all results in a segfault with the new Net
> module. BT Follows
This was a bug in edje that rephorm fixed. Update edje :)
dh
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future o
Hi,
Sometimes I'm experiencing crashes in E17 when try to run some application
using "Run command"
or using ibox. When I switch to VT I see 2 enlightenment processes - the one
launched by xinit and it's child.
BT of parent enlightenment process:
==
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 February 2007, at 01:18:46 (+0100),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
>> I still don't quite get all the opposition against autopoint (except
>> the stupid requirement that the cvs program must be available). In
>> my opinion automake-1.10 is not broken but people
Unloading, Disabling, all results in a segfault with the new Net
module. BT Follows
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1216330064 (LWP 1274)]
0xb79a3e18 in strcmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb79a3e18 in strcmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0xb7f9eeb8
Hello mates,
First, sorry about the double post. I sent it the first time with the
wrong From Addres. That aside
WARNING: Make sure to run in XNest or POOF.
After spending several hours on this and only coming up with temporary
"stop gap" solutions, I've decided to send this to the list for
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:23:17 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
mej is right - autopoint is FUCKED. the fact that it executes cvs alone makes
it a horrid horrid horrid hack. this requires that to work right you need to be
online to rebuild your build files. sorry - developers come
11 matches
Mail list logo
